Connect with us

Technology

FouAnalytics announces global availability of FouAnalytics Unlimited

Published

on

Flat-rate enterprise annual subscription for the world’s largest advertisers and agencies

NEW YORK, Aug. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — FouAnalytics, an independent digital advertising analytics platform, today announced the global availability of FouAnalytics Unlimited, a new enterprise subscription designed for the world’s largest advertisers and agencies. Priced at a flat annual fee of $2 million, FouAnalytics Unlimited provides analytics of served ad impressions across all formats — display, connected TV (CTV), online video (OLV), audio and native — without limits on the number of impressions, and comprehensive analytics for landing pages and websites, to measure clicks coming from Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Google search, TikTok, LinkedIn and other platforms, without limits on the number of pageviews measured.

“Who doesn’t love an unlimited plan?” said Dr. Augustine Fou, creator of FouAnalytics. “Just like Amazon Prime or unlimited wireless plans, FouAnalytics Unlimited eliminates the need to decide whether or not to fully measure ad campaigns with forensic analytics. This means all impressions can be measured for proper governance and real transparency.”

Against the backdrop of mounting scrutiny over high-profile failures by legacy verification vendors, FouAnalytics Unlimited offers advertisers a transparent alternative: independent forensics, data‑driven governance and continuous oversight of where their budgets actually go. “For years, the industry has been told that brand safety and fraud protection were taken care of, only to learn from investigations and whistleblowers that billions of dollars were quietly flowing to bots, fake traffic, made‑for‑arbitrage sites, disinformation and even highly inappropriate content,” Dr. Fou said.

FouAnalytics Unlimited is designed for advertisers who will no longer accept vague dashboards, generic assurances and invalid traffic, or IVT, numbers that legacy vendors cannot explain. They want independent, forensic proof of where every dollar and every ad impression go, and they want it at a scale that matches their global ad spending. None of the legacy verification vendors provide the level of detail that FouAnalytics does, so advertisers can “see Fou themselves” and understand why something is good or why something needs to be improved in their digital campaigns.

Responding to a crisis of confidence in legacy verification vendors

In recent years, advertisers, regulators and industry watchdogs have raised concerns about the performance and incentives of legacy verification vendors. Despite their widespread adoption, these vendors have found themselves at the center of reports showing ads running on made‑for‑arbitrage sites, copycat domains, piracy sites and properties that should have been flagged or excluded by basic fraud and safety checks.

Investigative research has repeatedly shown that large campaigns, including those of major consumer brands and public agencies, were still funding low‑quality inventory and risky environments, even while verification tags were present and fees were being charged for “protection.” These revelations have fueled a growing sense of disillusionment among marketers who believed that verification alone would shield them from fraud and reputational harm.

DOJ, NCIS ask ad executives about brand‑safety companies:
https://www.marketingbrew.com/stories/2024/10/11/doj-ncis-brand-safety-google-integral-ad-science-doubleverifyAd industry insiders say the vibe has soured on verification giants: “A broken system”:
https://www.businessinsider.com/doubleverify-integral-ad-science-face-fresh-brand-safety-scrutiny-2024-6Ad verification is under fire: Ad execs are questioning its role as protector:
https://digiday.com/marketing/ad-verification-is-under-fire-ad-execs-are-questioning-its-role-as-protector/

That crisis of confidence is reflected in an annual poll Fou has run over the past four years, asking practitioners whom they trust more for the accuracy of digital media verification. Across all four years, the results have been consistent: a clear majority of respondents chose FouAnalytics over legacy verification vendors, signaling a demonstrable trust gap between buyers and the incumbents’ offerings.

“At this point, the largest advertisers on earth know that ad fraud is not 1 percent and has not been 1 percent for the last 10 years straight, as reported by the legacy vendors,” Dr. Fou continued. “They have seen too many instances where the tools they paid for failed to catch obvious fraud or dangerous placements. Most advertisers now realize that 1 percent was all these vendors could catch, not all the fraud there was.”

Why flat‑rate governance matters

FouAnalytics has been proven over the last 15 years as an independent analytics platform used by some of the largest advertisers and agencies on earth for governance of their digital ad spending. The new flat‑rate model introduced today makes sense because governance should not fluctuate with the number of impressions served.

Under impression‑based pricing, legacy verification vendors are paid more when more impressions are served and measured, including fraudulent ones. This creates a structural conflict: finding and stopping more fraud would reduce the number of impressions and therefore reduce revenue for those vendors.

By contrast, FouAnalytics Unlimited uses a fixed annual subscription. The flat rate eliminates the financial incentive to tolerate or overlook fraud and instead aligns FouAnalytics with the advertiser’s objective: to identify and remove waste, fake traffic and risk wherever they occur, regardless of how many impressions are purchased – i.e. measure ALL of it.

What FouAnalytics Unlimited delivers

FouAnalytics Unlimited is tailored for advertisers and agencies that oversee media investments involving billions or tens of billions of ad impressions each year.

Key features include:

Flat‑rate, unlimited forensics: A single, predictable annual fee of $2 million covers unlimited served ad impressions, freeing large advertisers from per‑impression or percentage‑of‑media pricing structures that can penalize success or discourage comprehensive oversight.Full‑format coverage: FouAnalytics Unlimited spans display, CTV, OLV, audio and native placements, recognizing that fraud and waste are not confined to any one channel and that governance must follow where budgets flow.Landing‑page and site‑level analysis: Beyond the ad call, the subscription includes forensic analysis of landing pages and sites, enabling advertisers to detect fake‑traffic schemes, arbitrage setups and poor user experiences that traditional verification tools often overlook.Independent rules and methodologies: FouAnalytics operates independently of the buying platforms and intermediaries whose inventory is evaluated. Its methodologies are designed to uncover and measure fakery, waste and risk, not to preserve the status quo of opaque ad‑tech ecosystems. Detailed data is provided so customers can troubleshoot problems and understand why something is good or not good.

By unbundling governance from media buying and verification tagging, FouAnalytics Unlimited offers advertisers a structurally different approach. It is not a tax on media, but a dedicated investment in transparency and control.

Trusted by global advertisers

Global advertisers such as Beiersdorf activated a total of 13 Performance Max campaigns across five countries, measured and optimized the performance of these campaigns with FouAnalytics and documented the case study and best practices with Dentsu, OMD, Iris and Google Ads.

FouAnalytics already counts three of the largest demand‑side platforms as long‑term customers, and one of them has already upgraded to FouAnalytics Unlimited. Not only did they discontinue using legacy verification vendors, but they are also using FouAnalytics data to continuously monitor and improve inventory quality for all of their customers at the same time.

“Once you see the FouAnalytics data, it is hard to go back. That is why we invite you to “see Fou yourself too,” Dr. Fou concluded.

About FouAnalytics

Created by Dr. Augustine Fou, FouAnalytics is an independent analytics and verification platform for digital ads, websites and mobile apps. The platform provides detailed analytical data so practitioners can “see Fou themselves” and understand precisely why something is good quality and troubleshoot what is not. FouAnalytics is used globally by clients including Microsoft, Beiersdorf and Georgia‑Pacific, independent agencies and every major agency holding company, as well as more than 10,000 small and midsize businesses and site owners. More details are at https://www.fouanalytics.com.

Media contact

Dr. Augustine Fou
augustine.fou@fouanalytics.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/augustinefou/
212-203-7239

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fouanalytics-announces-global-availability-of-fouanalytics-unlimited-302845458.html

SOURCE FouAnalytics

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

As Enterprises Rush to Autonomous Security, New Omdia Market Update Points to Practitioner Governance as the Differentiator

Published

on

By

A 2026 market update to Omdia’s technical validation examines managed agentic SOC delivery on Google Security Operations, finding that governance, not autonomy, is what separates measurable outcomes from AI hype.

OVERLAND PARK, Kan., Aug. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — As organizations move quickly to adopt autonomous, AI-driven security operations, a new 2026 market update from Omdia finds that the adoption of agentic AI is outpacing the governance meant to control it. Fifty-two percent of organizations with security operations centers already deploy agentic AI, yet only 25 percent formally assess every agentic AI investment, even as these systems take autonomous action. The update, produced by Omdia’s Go-to-Market Insights and Advisory practice, extends its technical validation of Foresite Cybersecurity’s managed security operations on Google Security Operations (SecOps).

Read the Omdia technical validation at foresite.com →

New Omdia validation: Foresite’s governed agentic SOC cuts investigation time by ~60%.

The market update examines a shift now visible across the enterprise: security teams are absorbing surging data volumes without adding investigation load, and it points to practitioner-governed, human-in-the-loop accountability as the factor separating durable outcomes from tool sprawl. 

Reviewing Foresite’s security operations data, Omdia validated several key performance gains that demonstrate the platform’s ability to scale analyst effectiveness and deliver governed autonomy:

A ~60% reduction in mean time to investigate (MTTI), accelerating the speed of response.

A flat investigation load even as raw telemetry data surged by 278%, proving the system’s capacity to handle growth without overburdening analysts.

An increase in benign-event auto-identification from 25% to 86%, demonstrating the accuracy of the automation and allowing analysts to focus on critical threats.

Foresite operates as the human control layer for AI-driven security, pairing Google’s agentic investigation capabilities with named-practitioner accountability. Every autonomous investigation is reviewed and authorized by a named analyst before response actions execute, giving customers clear visibility into how decisions are made and risk is managed. Autonomous investigation runs at machine speed while a practitioner validates every high-impact action, so agentic never means uncontrolled.

“The speed of agentic adoption is outrunning the oversight meant to govern it. Organizations are deploying these systems faster than they are assessing them. Foresite’s approach, autonomous investigation at machine speed with a named practitioner accountable for every high-impact action, is a practical answer to that gap,” said Tony Palmer, Principal Analyst and Practice Director, Omdia.

“Autonomous investigation runs at machine speed. The actions you can’t take back are validated by a named practitioner before they execute. That is the difference between an agent you can govern and one you are simply told to trust,” said Jeremy Hehl, Chief Evangelist at Foresite.

Foresite delivers fully managed security operations on Google SecOps, enabling customers to detect and respond to threats in seconds, reduce investigation fatigue, and maintain continuous audit readiness without expanding internal teams. As a Google Cloud Premier Partner with Security and MSSP specializations, the company delivers managed services through its Catalyst platform, extending Google SecOps with operational governance, automation, and continuous compliance.

The market update follows Foresite being named the 2026 Google Cloud Security Partner of the Year for North America, presented at Google Cloud Next ’26, and builds on Omdia’s original technical validation of the Catalyst platform commissioned by Google in 2025. Across its managed services, and validated in the Omdia update, Foresite reduced mean time to investigate by roughly 60 percent while sustaining 96 percent customer retention and sub-15-second automated threat response.

Foresite representatives will be at Black Hat USA 2026 in Las Vegas, including a happy hour co-hosted with Google and Jeremy Hehl’s appearance on the EC-Council podcast with Jay Bavisi..

About Foresite Cybersecurity

Foresite Cybersecurity is a Google Cloud Premier Partner, and a Wiz Premier Partner providing managed security operations, compliance automation, and threat intelligence services. Through its Catalyst platform, Foresite helps organizations operationalize agentic AI security with practitioner-led governance and measurable risk reduction. Learn more at foresite.com.

Media Contacts

Claire Simpson, Director of Brand and Marketing

Tim Suwandhaputra, VP, Go-to-Market

press@foresite.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/as-enterprises-rush-to-autonomous-security-new-omdia-market-update-points-to-practitioner-governance-as-the-differentiator-302845534.html

SOURCE Foresite

Continue Reading

Technology

Cogeco Communications Announces $200 Million Reopening of Senior Secured Notes due 2033

Published

on

By

/NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE U.S./

MONTRÉAL, Aug. 6, 2026 /CNW/ — Cogeco Communications Inc. (TSX: CCA) (“Cogeco Communications” or the “Corporation”) announced today that it has priced an offering of an additional $200 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.299% senior secured notes due February 16, 2033 (the “Notes”).

The Notes will have identical terms (except for their date of issue, issue price, matters relating to the resale restriction and temporary security identifiers) and be fully fungible with and form a single series with the $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.299% senior secured notes issued by the Corporation on February 16, 2023. The Notes will be issued at a price of 103.966% of their face value (plus accrued interest from February 16, 2026), for a reopening yield of 4.565%.

The Notes are being offered through an agency syndicate consisting of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., CIBC World Markets Inc. and National Bank Financial Inc., as joint bookrunners and co-lead managers, and including Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., Desjardins Securities Inc., RBC Dominion Securities Inc., MUFG Securities (Canada), Ltd., TD Securities Inc. and Casgrain & Company Limited, as co-managers.

The offering is expected to close on or about August 10, 2026, subject to customary closing conditions. Cogeco Communications intends to use the net proceeds of the offering to repay existing indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

The Notes will be direct and unsubordinated secured debt obligations of Cogeco Communications and will rank equally and pari passu, with all other secured senior indebtedness of Cogeco Communications.

The Notes have been assigned a provisional rating of “BBB (low)” from DBRS Limited (DBRS Morningstar) with a “Stable” trend and a provisional rating of “BBB-” from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. The Notes are being offered in Canada on a private placement basis in reliance upon exemptions from the prospectus requirements under applicable securities legislation.

The Notes have not been and will not be qualified for sale to the public under applicable securities laws in Canada and, accordingly, any offer and sale of the Notes in Canada will be made on a basis which is exempt from the prospectus requirements of such securities laws. The Notes have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”), or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration under, or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of, the U.S. Securities Act. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction where it is unlawful to do so.

ABOUT COGECO COMMUNICATIONS INC.

Cogeco Communications Inc. is a leading telecommunications provider committed to bringing people together through powerful communications and entertainment experiences. We provide world-class Internet, wireless, video and wireline phone services to 1.6 million residential and business subscribers in Canada and thirteen states in the United States. Our services are marketed under the Cogeco and oxio brands in Canada, and under the Breezeline and welo brands in the U.S. We take pride in our strong presence in the communities we serve and in our commitment to a sustainable future. Cogeco Communications Inc.’s subordinate voting shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: CCA).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of securities laws. Forward-looking information may relate to Cogeco Communications, future outlook and anticipated events, business, operations, financial performance, financial condition or results and, in some cases, can be identified by terminology such as “may”; “will”; “should”; “expect”; “plan”; “anticipate”; “believe”; “intend”; “estimate”; “predict”; “potential”; “continue”; “foresee”; “ensure” or other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Particularly, statements with respect to the offering of Notes and the intended timing and completion thereof, and the expected use of the net proceeds of the offering of Notes, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain factors and assumptions including expected satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to closing the offering of Notes on the expected timeline, which Cogeco Communications believes are reasonable as of the current date. While management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to the Corporation, they may prove to be incorrect. Forward-looking information is also subject to certain factors, including risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what Cogeco Communications currently expects. These factors include risks such as the failure to satisfy the conditions to the completion of the offering of Notes, as well as general market conditions, competitive risks (including changing competitive and technology ecosystems and disruptive competitive strategies adopted by our competitors), business risks, regulatory risks (including changes in laws or government policies and the impact of regulatory decisions, such as those of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission in Canada or of the Federal Communications Commission in the U.S.), tax risks, technology risks (including the evolution of technology and the threat of cybersecurity), financial risks (including variations in currency and interest rates), economic conditions (including inflation, trade tariffs, reduced consumer spending and increasing costs), talent management risks (including the highly competitive market for a limited pool of digitally skilled employees), human-caused and natural threats to the Corporation’s network (including increased frequency of extreme weather events with the potential to disrupt operations), infrastructure and systems, sustainability and sustainability reporting risks, ethical behavior risks, ownership risks, litigation risks and public health and safety, many of which are beyond the Corporation’s control. For more exhaustive information on these risks and uncertainties, the reader should refer to the “Uncertainties and main risk factors” section of the Corporation’s fiscal 2025 annual Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) and of the fiscal 2026 third-quarter MD&A. The closing of the offering is subject to general market and other conditions and there can be no assurance that the offering will be completed or that the terms of the offering will not be modified. These factors are not intended to represent a complete list of the factors that could affect Cogeco Communications and future events and results may vary significantly from what management currently foresees. The reader should not place undue importance on forward-looking information contained in this press release and the forward-looking statements contained in this press release represent Cogeco Communications’ expectations as of the date of this press release (or as of the date they are otherwise stated to be made) and are subject to change after such date. While management may elect to do so, the Corporation is under no obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) and does not undertake to update or alter this information at any particular time, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. All amounts are stated in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.

INFORMATION:

Patrice Ouimet

Troy Crandall

Chief Financial Officer

Head, Investor Relations

Cogeco Communications Inc.

Cogeco Communications Inc.

(514) 764-4700

(514) 764-4600

patrice.ouimet@cogeco.com

troy.crandall@cogeco.com

SOURCE Cogeco Communications Inc.

Continue Reading

Technology

New Study Ranks 68 Third-Party Risk Management Platforms

Published

on

By

New research maps 68 third-party risk management platforms in one ranked, source-linked comparison: what compliance really costs in 2026, who publishes prices, who actually scans vendors and what the first Gartner Magic Quadrant for TPRM left out. The full ranking and all 911 sources are free to read.

ATHENS, Greece, Aug. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ — Research agency SocialActive today announced The TPRM Platform Landscape 2026, a 78-page ranked comparison of 68 third-party risk management (TPRM) platforms, compiled from 911 publicly archived sources and free to read.

“Only 17 of the 68 platforms publish a price, and 43 never technically examine the vendors they assess. Buyers have been building shortlists in the dark.”

Third-party risk management became a regulated obligation for hundreds of thousands of European organisations when the EU’s DORA regulation began applying in January 2025 and as NIS2 transposition reached 22 of 27 member states by May 2026. The study examines the software market that serves that obligation, from free open-source tools to enterprise suites estimated at more than USD 1 million per year, and ranks all 68 platforms through a stated buyer lens: nine criteria, listed in descending order of weight and drawn from a 20-criterion evaluation framework, so a reader whose priorities differ can rebuild the shortlist from the same evidence. The report’s reference buyer is a European organisation of roughly 20 to 1,000 employees managing 10 to 150 vendors without a dedicated risk team; a separate shortlist covers enterprises above that range.

Key findings include:

Pricing opacity is the market norm. Only 17 of the 68 platforms publish a real price anywhere public; the remaining 51 quote prices only after a sales process. Published annual entry prices alone span EUR 1,020 to USD 125,000.The cost spread for the same need remains wide. Published prices for TPRM tooling alone span EUR 1,500 to USD 125,000 per year, and for a 120-employee manufacturer needing NIS2 and ISO 27001 coverage with vendor oversight, documented three-year totals range from roughly EUR 20,000 on published EU pricing to USD 150,000 and above on estimated enterprise deployments.External verification is rare. Roughly 43 of the 68 platforms offer no external technical scanning of the vendors they assess, 14 license partner ratings feeds, and 11 operate something native. Exactly one, the EU platform StartComply, bundles active scanning of each vendor’s domain into an SMB-priced TPRM subscription, published at EUR 1,500 per year.The 2026 analyst landscape has blind spots. Gartner’s first Magic Quadrant for TPRM Tools (April 2026) and Forrester’s Q1 2026 Wave exclude the security-ratings vendors and the entire affordable EU segment, so smaller European buyers cannot outsource their shortlist to either report.Ownership is unstable. The study documents twelve acquisitions, rebrands and funding events between 2023 and 2026 that changed vendors’ names, owners or sovereignty status, including one platform whose Dutch-ownership story ended overnight with a US acquisition, and one vendor whose operating company could not be independently verified at all.

Every material claim in the report carries a source link or an explicit label (public price, estimate, vendor-claimed, or not found), conflicts between sources are stated rather than smoothed over, and the report publishes a standing corrections policy: any vendor that believes a fact is wrong is invited to submit the primary source, and corrections are applied with a dated note.

“We wrote the study we could not find anywhere: every platform, every price we could document, and every claim labelled for what it is. We state the lens and the weighting openly, so a reader who ranks the criteria differently can rebuild the shortlist from the same evidence,” said Andreas Kougentakos, Founder at SocialActive.

The full report, the 68-platform master registry, the comparison tables and the full set of charts are available free of charge at https://socialactivecom.substack.com/p/tprm-platform-comparison.

About SocialActive

SocialActive is an award-winning B2B marketing and research agency based in Greece. Its research publications use public sources only, label every figure by evidence type, and publish their criteria and sources in full.

Media Contact

Andreas Kougentakos, SocialActive, 30 6985944467, press@socialactive.com, socialactive.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prweb.com/releases/new-study-ranks-68-third-party-risk-management-platforms-302844679.html

SOURCE SocialActive

Continue Reading

Trending