Connect with us

Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market to record USD 8.88 Bn — Driven by an increased focus on energy management and green initiatives

Published

on

NEW YORK, Sept. 14, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — The “Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market by Application and Geography – Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026” report has been added to Technavio’s offering. The report expects the market size to grow by USD 8.88 billion between 2021 and 2026, expanding at a CAGR of 24.54% during the forecast period. The report considers various aspects such as the consumer base, adoption rate, average selling price, revenue generated by vendors, and various other factors to estimate the market size. Download Sample PDF Report Here to get an idea of the overall scope of the full report.

The global DCIM solutions market is fragmented due to the presence of several global and regional vendors. Global vendors have a high market share in the global DCIM solutions market due to the extensive range of their flagship products. Global vendors focus on innovation and technological advancements and increase their market share based on brand, quality, and reliability. Global vendors increase their customer base by increasing their product offerings and expanding their geographic reach. Hence, the competition among the vendors of the DCIM solutions market is expected to remain high during the forecast period.

Most of the prominent vendors of the global DCIM solutions market include ABB Ltd., Aplena Inc., BGIS Global Integrated Solutions, Broadcom Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., CommScope Holding Co. Inc., Device42 Inc., Eaton Corp. Plc, FNT GmbH, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Legrand, Modius Inc., Nlyte Software Ltd., Panduit Corp., Rackwise Inc., RF Code Inc., Schneider Electric SE, Siemens AG, Sunbird Inc., Vertiv Holdings Co., and Zoho Corp. Pvt. Ltd. are some of the major market participants.

Although the increased focus on energy management and green initiatives will offer immense growth opportunities, investments in initial infrastructure and related requirements will challenge the growth of the market participants. To make the most of the opportunities, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments.

The global data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market is segmented as below:

Application Asset and Capacity ManagementEnergy ManagementPower and Cooling ManagementNetwork Management

The market growth in the asset and capacity management segment will be significant over the forecast period.

Geography North AmericaAPACEuropeThe Middle East and AfricaSouth America

APAC will emerge as a key market, occupying 38% of the global market share. The regional market is driven by the increasing number of colocation facilities and a growing number of hyper-scale data centers in China.

Technavio presents a detailed picture of the market by the way of study, synthesis, and summation of data from multiple sources. Our data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market report covers the following areas:

Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market SizeData Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market TrendsData Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market Industry Analysis

Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market 2022-2026: Vendor Analysis

We provide a detailed analysis of around 25 vendors operating in the data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market. Backed with competitive intelligence and benchmarking, our research reports on the data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market are designed to provide entry support, customer profile, and M&As as well as go-to-market strategy support.

Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market 2022-2026: Key Highlights

CAGR of the market during the forecast period 2022-2026Detailed information on factors that will assist data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market growth during the next five yearsEstimation of the data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market size and its contribution to the parent marketPredictions on upcoming trends and changes in consumer behaviorThe growth of the data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions marketAnalysis of the market’s competitive landscape and detailed information on vendorsComprehensive details of factors that will challenge the growth of data center infrastructure management (DCIM) solutions market vendors

Related Reports:

Green Data Center Market by End-user and Geography – Forecast and Analysis 2021-2025Data Center Maintenance and Support Services Market by End-user and Geography – Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026

Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM) Solutions Market Scope

Report Coverage

Details

Page number

120

Base year

2021

Forecast period

2022-2026

Growth momentum & CAGR

Accelerate at a CAGR of 24.54%

Market growth 2022-2026

USD 8.88 billion

Market structure

Fragmented

YoY growth (%)

24.0

Regional analysis

North America, APAC, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and South America

Performing market contribution

APAC at 38%

Key consumer countries

US, Canada, China, India, UK, and Germany

Competitive landscape

Leading companies, competitive strategies, consumer engagement scope

Companies profiled

ABB Ltd., Aplena Inc., BGIS Global Integrated Solutions, Broadcom Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., CommScope Holding Co. Inc., Device42 Inc., Eaton Corp. Plc, FNT GmbH, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Legrand, Modius Inc., Nlyte Software Ltd., Panduit Corp., Rackwise Inc., RF Code Inc., Schneider Electric SE, Siemens AG, Sunbird Inc., Vertiv Holdings Co., and Zoho Corp. Pvt. Ltd.

Market Dynamics

Parent market analysis, Market growth inducers and obstacles, Fast-growing and slow-growing segment analysis, COVID-19 impact and future consumer dynamics, and market condition analysis for the forecast period.

Customization purview

If our report has not included the data that you are looking for, you can reach out to our analysts and get segments customized.

Table Of Contents:

1 Executive Summary

1.1 Market overviewExhibit 01: Executive Summary – Chart on Market OverviewExhibit 02: Executive Summary – Data Table on Market OverviewExhibit 03: Executive Summary – Chart on Global Market CharacteristicsExhibit 04: Executive Summary – Chart on Market by GeographyExhibit 05: Executive Summary – Chart on Market Segmentation by ApplicationExhibit 06: Executive Summary – Chart on Incremental GrowthExhibit 07: Executive Summary – Data Table on Incremental GrowthExhibit 08: Executive Summary – Chart on Vendor Market Positioning

2 Market Landscape

2.1 Market ecosystemExhibit 09: Parent marketExhibit 10: Market Characteristics

3 Market Sizing

3.1 Market definitionExhibit 11: Offerings of vendors included in the market definition3.2 Market segment analysisExhibit 12: Market segments3.3 Market size 20213.4 Market outlook: Forecast for 2021-2026Exhibit 13: Chart on Global – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 14: Data Table on Global – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 15: Chart on Global Market: Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 16: Data Table on Global Market: Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)

4 Five Forces Analysis

4.1 Five forces summaryExhibit 17: Five forces analysis – Comparison between 2021 and 20264.2 Bargaining power of buyersExhibit 18: Chart on Bargaining power of buyers – Impact of key factors 2021 and 20264.3 Bargaining power of suppliersExhibit 19: Bargaining power of suppliers – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 20264.4 Threat of new entrantsExhibit 20: Threat of new entrants – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 20264.5 Threat of substitutesExhibit 21: Threat of substitutes – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 20264.6 Threat of rivalryExhibit 22: Threat of rivalry – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 20264.7 Market conditionExhibit 23: Chart on Market condition – Five forces 2021 and 2026

5 Market Segmentation by Application

5.1 Market segmentsExhibit 24: Chart on Application – Market share 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 25: Data Table on Application – Market share 2021-2026 (%)5.2 Comparison by ApplicationExhibit 26: Chart on Comparison by ApplicationExhibit 27: Data Table on Comparison by Application5.3 Asset and capacity management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 28: Chart on Asset and capacity management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 29: Data Table on Asset and capacity management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 30: Chart on Asset and capacity management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 31: Data Table on Asset and capacity management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)5.4 Energy management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 32: Chart on Energy management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 33: Data Table on Energy management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 34: Chart on Energy management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 35: Data Table on Energy management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)5.5 Power and cooling management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 36: Chart on Power and cooling management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 37: Data Table on Power and cooling management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 38: Chart on Power and cooling management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 39: Data Table on Power and cooling management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)5.6 Network management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 40: Chart on Network management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 41: Data Table on Network management – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 42: Chart on Network management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 43: Data Table on Network management – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)5.7 Market opportunity by ApplicationExhibit 44: Market opportunity by Application ($ million)

6 Customer Landscape

6.1 Customer landscape overviewExhibit 45: Analysis of price sensitivity, lifecycle, customer purchase basket, adoption rates, and purchase criteria

7 Geographic Landscape

7.1 Geographic segmentationExhibit 46: Chart on Market share by geography 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 47: Data Table on Market share by geography 2021-2026 (%)7.2 Geographic comparisonExhibit 48: Chart on Geographic comparisonExhibit 49: Data Table on Geographic comparison7.3 North America – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 50: Chart on North America – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 51: Data Table on North America – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 52: Chart on North America – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 53: Data Table on North America – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.4 APAC – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 54: Chart on APAC – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 55: Data Table on APAC – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 56: Chart on APAC – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 57: Data Table on APAC – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.5 Europe – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 58: Chart on Europe – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 59: Data Table on Europe – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 60: Chart on Europe – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 61: Data Table on Europe – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.6 Middle East and Africa – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 62: Chart on Middle East and Africa – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 63: Data Table on Middle East and Africa – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 64: Chart on Middle East and Africa – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 65: Data Table on Middle East and Africa – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.7 South America – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 66: Chart on South America – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 67: Data Table on South America – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 68: Chart on South America – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 69: Data Table on South America – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.8 US – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 70: Chart on US – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 71: Data Table on US – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 72: Chart on US – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 73: Data Table on US – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.9 China – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 74: Chart on China – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 75: Data Table on China – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 76: Chart on China – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 77: Data Table on China – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.10 UK – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 78: Chart on UK – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 79: Data Table on UK – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 80: Chart on UK – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 81: Data Table on UK – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.11 India – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 82: Chart on India – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 83: Data Table on India – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 84: Chart on India – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 85: Data Table on India – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.12 Germany – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 86: Chart on Germany – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 87: Data Table on Germany – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 88: Chart on Germany – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 89: Data Table on Germany – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.13 Canada – Market size and forecast 2021-2026Exhibit 90: Chart on Canada – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 91: Data Table on Canada – Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)Exhibit 92: Chart on Canada – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)Exhibit 93: Data Table on Canada – Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)7.14 Market opportunity by geographyExhibit 94: Market opportunity by geography ($ million)

8 Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

8.1 Market drivers8.2 Market challenges8.3 Impact of drivers and challengesExhibit 95: Impact of drivers and challenges in 2021 and 20268.4 Market trends

9 Vendor Landscape

9.1 Overview9.2 Vendor landscapeExhibit 96: Overview on Criticality of inputs and Factors of differentiation9.3 Landscape disruptionExhibit 97: Overview on factors of disruption9.4 Industry risksExhibit 98: Impact of key risks on business

10 Vendor Analysis

10.1 Vendors coveredExhibit 99: Vendors covered10.2 Market positioning of vendorsExhibit 100: Matrix on vendor position and classification10.3 ABB Ltd.Exhibit 101: ABB Ltd. – OverviewExhibit 102: ABB Ltd. – Business segmentsExhibit 103: ABB Ltd. – Key offeringsExhibit 104: ABB Ltd. – Segment focus10.4 BGIS Global Integrated SolutionsExhibit 105: BGIS Global Integrated Solutions – OverviewExhibit 106: BGIS Global Integrated Solutions – Product / ServiceExhibit 107: BGIS Global Integrated Solutions – Key offerings10.5 Cisco Systems Inc.Exhibit 108: Cisco Systems Inc. – OverviewExhibit 109: Cisco Systems Inc. – Business segmentsExhibit 110: Cisco Systems Inc. – Key newsExhibit 111: Cisco Systems Inc. – Key offeringsExhibit 112: Cisco Systems Inc. – Segment focus10.6 FNT GmbHExhibit 113: FNT GmbH – OverviewExhibit 114: FNT GmbH – Product / ServiceExhibit 115: FNT GmbH – Key offerings10.7 Nlyte Software Ltd.Exhibit 116: Nlyte Software Ltd. – OverviewExhibit 117: Nlyte Software Ltd. – Product / ServiceExhibit 118: Nlyte Software Ltd. – Key offerings10.8 Panduit Corp.Exhibit 119: Panduit Corp. – OverviewExhibit 120: Panduit Corp. – Product / ServiceExhibit 121: Panduit Corp. – Key offerings10.9 Rackwise Inc.Exhibit 122: Rackwise Inc. – OverviewExhibit 123: Rackwise Inc. – Product / ServiceExhibit 124: Rackwise Inc. – Key offerings10.10 Schneider Electric SEExhibit 125: Schneider Electric SE – OverviewExhibit 126: Schneider Electric SE – Business segmentsExhibit 127: Schneider Electric SE – Key newsExhibit 128: Schneider Electric SE – Key offeringsExhibit 129: Schneider Electric SE – Segment focus10.11 Siemens AGExhibit 130: Siemens AG – OverviewExhibit 131: Siemens AG – Business segmentsExhibit 132: Siemens AG – Key newsExhibit 133: Siemens AG – Key offeringsExhibit 134: Siemens AG – Segment focus10.12 Sunbird Inc.Exhibit 135: Sunbird Inc. – OverviewExhibit 136: Sunbird Inc. – Product / ServiceExhibit 137: Sunbird Inc. – Key offerings

11 Appendix

11.1 Scope of the report11.2 Inclusions and exclusions checklistExhibit 138: Inclusions checklistExhibit 139: Exclusions checklist11.3 Currency conversion rates for US$Exhibit 140: Currency conversion rates for US$11.4 Research methodologyExhibit 141: Research methodologyExhibit 142: Validation techniques employed for market sizingExhibit 143: Information sources11.5 List of abbreviationsExhibit 144: List of abbreviations

About Us

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focus on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavio’s report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning across 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavio’s comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

Contact

Technavio Research
Jesse Maida
Media & Marketing Executive
US: +1 844 364 1100
UK: +44 203 893 3200
Email: media@technavio.com
Website: www.technavio.com/

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/data-center-infrastructure-management-dcim-solutions-market-to-record-usd-8-88-bn–driven-by-an-increased-focus-on-energy-management-and-green-initiatives-301623372.html

SOURCE Technavio

Continue Reading

Technology

U.S. News & World Report Reveals the 2027 Best Places to Retire

Published

on

By

Affordability is a top priority for attendees as Midland, Michigan, holds No. 1 spot.

Summary

Midland, Michigan, is the No. 1 Best Place to Retire for the second year in a row.Affordability is the most considered factor when choosing a place to retire in 2027.Florida and Texas dominate the top 250 Best Places to Retire, offering a number of affordable and retiree-tax friendly locations.

WASHINGTON, Oct. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. News & World Report, the global authority in rankings and consumer advice, today revealed the 2027 Best Places to Retire in the United States.

Midland, Michigan, retained the No. 1 rank for the second year in a row. Midland scored high in affordability and retiree taxes, helping it to lock in the top spot.

“Retirees are seeking a place that gives them a sense of security and comfort as they live out their golden years,” said Megan Wood, assistant managing editor, home services and real estate. “Whether that comfort prioritizes scenic nature spots, access to multi-cultural experiences, or everyday affordability, places like Midland, Michigan, offer financial safety while still providing a good quality of life.”

Homosassa Springs, Florida, came in at No. 2 due to strong scores in affordability, 55+ population growth and retiree taxes. High performance for, quality of life, retiree taxes, affordability and quality of life resulted in Weirton, West Virginia, placing No. 3 on the list.

U.S. News adjusted its scoring weights for the 2027 rankings to mirror a growing concern for affordability in America. This resulted in multiple double-digit jumps in the top 25, including Paducah, Kentucky (No. 8), ascending into the top 10 for the first time.

“It’s no secret that affordability is top of mind for Americans this year, which is why U.S. News updated its weighting criteria to better align with what retirees prioritize,” Wood said. “The 2027 rankings reflect key metrics used to highlight the places that best suit retiree needs.”

U.S. News evaluated more than 850 U.S. cities – publishing the top 250 places – based on how well they meet American retirees’ expectations against measures including quality of life, affordability, healthcare, retiree taxes, job market, and population and migration for retirees aged 55 and older.

The six measures factored into this year’s rankings were weighted based on a public survey of individuals across the U.S. who are at or approaching retirement age (45 and older) to find out what matters most to people when they’re considering where to retire. Resources include federal, state and local data provided by Applied Geographic Solutions, which includes data sourced from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis and U.S. News’ Best Hospitals rankings. To learn more about how the rankings are determined, read the Best Places to Retire methodology.

Best Places to Retire is part of U.S. News’ Real Estate section, which provides rankings and tools to help individuals navigate the housing market, including home value estimates to working with an agent.

2027 U.S. News Best Places to Retire – Top 10 
*See the full rankings here.

Midland, Michigan Homosassa Springs, Florida Weirton, West VirginiaThe Woodlands, TexasSpring, TexasRancho Rio, New Mexico Altoona, PennsylvaniaPaducah, KentuckyLynchburg, Virginia Palm Coast, Florida 

For more information on Best Places to Retire, explore Facebook, LinkedIn, Tik Tok, Instagram and X using #BestPlacesToRetire.

About U.S. News & World Report
U.S. News & World Report is the global leader for journalism that empowers consumers, citizens, business leaders and policy officials to make confident decisions in all aspects of their lives and communities. A multifaceted media company, U.S. News provides unbiased rankings, independent reporting and analysis, and consumer advice to millions of people on USNews.com each month. A pillar in Washington for more than 90 years, U.S. News is the trusted home for in-depth and exclusive insights on education, health, politics, the economy, insurance, personal finance, travel, automobiles, real estate, careers and consumer products and services.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-news–world-report-reveals-the-2027-best-places-to-retire-302920068.html

SOURCE U.S. News & World Report, L.P.

Continue Reading

Technology

IBM Introduces Identity and Control for AI Agents, Securing Frontier Intelligence for the Enterprise

Published

on

By

Enterprises are deploying agents faster than they can verify them. HashiCorp Vault uses Agent Identity to give each agent a governed identity Verified agents still need limits on access. Vault extends its established secrets management to AI agents, built to enforce least-privilege access and enable real-time revocation when an agent attempts an unauthorized action Enterprises can’t scale agents they can’t see, test or account for. IBM watsonx Orchestrate is designed to unify discovery, containment, and evaluation across Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry and Google Gemini 

ATLANTA, Oct. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — At TechXchange 2026, IBM (NYSE: IBM) is announcing new capabilities to help developers, IT and security teams put AI agents to work across business systems with clear authority and accountability. IBM brings together agent discovery, verified identities, access controls and performance evaluation to help organizations understand who owns each agent, control what it can access, and trace its actions across existing applications and infrastructure.  

According to Gartner, by 2028 the average Fortune 500 enterprise will use over 150,000 AI agents. But only 13% of organizations believe that they have the right AI agent governance in place [1]. Persistent credentials, unclear ownership and disconnected controls make it harder to govern agents as they interact with other agents, invoke tools and act across teams, platforms and clouds. 

“The winners in enterprise AI are changing how their business runs, not simply adding more AI to it,” said Dinesh Nirmal, Senior Vice President, IBM Software. “For agents to take on real work across the systems a company depends on, it requires an AI operating model – one that connects agents to the business’s data, applications and infrastructure and runs them with the same discipline as its most critical systems. Build trust and control into that model, and agents stop being a technology and become a way of doing business.”  

Today’s announcements extend IBM’s portfolio to deliver an AI operating model of four essential systems working together: agents, data, automation and hybrid infrastructure. This starts with the trust and control every agent needs – a verified identity, only the access it needs, and one place to discover, secure and evaluate agents regardless of where they were built. 

Extending HashiCorp Vault to AI agents
HashiCorp Vault manages the secrets and credentials that applications and services use to access business systems. It provides that control through centrally managed secrets, automated rotation for supported credentials, and dynamically generated credentials that expire or can be revoked. These capabilities help reduce the time exposed credentials remain usable and limit access to the permissions configured for each role. 

HashiCorp Vault already secures non-human identities for organizations including ABN AMRO, Adobe, athenahealth, BBVA, BlackRock, Canva, Duke Energy, Expedia, London Stock Exchange, Starbucks, Swiss Federal Railways and Target, across systems that process billions of dollars in transactions [2]. HashiCorp will now extend those capabilities to AI agents, issuing secured, short-lived credentials that limit each agent to what it needs. 

Establishing agent identity and accountability
AI agents are a growing class of non-human identity, alongside applications and services. As they begin acting across business systems, enterprises need a clear record of who owns each agent and what authority it has been granted. HashiCorp is combining governed agent identity with credential controls to help organizations delegate work with defined authority and accountability. 

When used with HashiCorp Vault, Agent Identity establishes the authoritative record for each agent, such as who owns it, its lifecycle status and the authority it has been granted. Built to extend existing identity and security investments, it shares relevant identity and authorization context with Vault’s credential controls – ultimately enforcing least-privilege access and enabling real-time revocation when an agent attempts an unauthorized action. 

Controlling agent credentials and access
Identifying an agent is only the start. Enterprises also need to control the credentials it uses to reach databases, applications and cloud services – and how long those credentials remain valid. As agents invoke tools and act across business systems, their credentials become a critical security boundary. An agent with a long-lived, overprivileged credential can put systems and data at risk if it’s compromised or acts outside its intended task. Enterprises need to establish what each agent’s job is, limit the access it receives and revoke that access when circumstances change. 

These controls extend beyond initial authentication. If an agent attempts to retrieve information or perform actions outside its approved permissions, the access can be denied and session revoked in real time to prevent unauthorized activity. Vault’s short-lived credentials and least-privilege controls can further restrict what an agent accesses and the duration of those permissions.  

Additional capabilities include: 

Vault 2.2 gives agents their own secured accounts, automatically renews their credentials and incorporates post-quantum encryption for quantum-era threats. Secure Hub (public preview) gives companies centralized visibility across their Vault environments to make it easier to understand operational health, usage and security resources. 

At TechXchange, client speakers will share how they use Vault to secure enterprise applications, workloads and AI agents 

athenahealth: Automating certificate management with Vault’s PKI engine. Albert Einstein College of Medicine: Applying IBM Verify and Vault to AI agent identity, just-in-time access, dynamic secrets and auditability. Optum: Using Vault Radar to detect exposed secrets and Boundary for just-in-time, identity-based access. Seven-Eleven Japan: Centralizing and encrypting secrets with Vault Enterprise and detecting hardcoded secrets with Vault Radar. Yum! Brands: Building an identity security platform with IBM Verify, with a look ahead to machine identities and secrets management. 

“AI presents extraordinary opportunities to accelerate biomedical research and discovery, but realizing its potential requires a foundation of security, trust, and responsible governance,” said Shailesh M. Shenoy, Assistant Dean for Information Technology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. “In my experience, technologies such as IBM Verify and HashiCorp Vault can play an important role in helping organizations establish the identity, access, and security controls needed to innovate with confidence.”  

Managing agents across platforms
Identity tells organizations what an agent is. But they also need to see every agent they have, wherever it was built. IBM watsonx Orchestrate works across the AI ecosystem, not inside a single vendor’s platform, to give organizations one place to discover, secure and evaluate their agents. Capabilities include: 

Discover (tech preview): Organizations can’t govern agents they don’t know exist. Orchestrate connects to platforms such as Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry and Google Gemini to find agents built in third-party environments, so teams can see and manage agents instead of adding them manually. This capability also extends to models and MCP servers. Contain (tech preview): One rogue agent can disrupt others and spread mistakes across the business. Orchestrate now runs agents in isolated sandboxes so a rogue agent can’t interfere with others. Teams also now have access to a kill switch to shut down any agent. Evaluate: Agents that aren’t tested and tracked can quietly drift off course and increase costs. Teams using Orchestrate can now test the quality, accuracy and compliance of agents, models and MCP servers before deployment, then monitor them in production. Built-in cost tracking shows each agent’s model and token use, so teams can spot what’s driving spend and fix it. 

Orchestrate also works with Vault’s credential controls and Agent Identity to establish what each agent’s job is, govern its authority and enforce least-privilege credential access. Together, these controls help organizations authorize and audit agent actions and rapidly revoke trust and credentials when risk changes. 

Connecting agents to the business
Once agents are authorized to use a company’s APIs and tools, they need to know what already exists, how systems connect, what can be reused safely and what their actions could affect. IBM Integration Intelligence Hub is built to provide that knowledge through its Unified Context Engine, so agents can fix problems like stuck messages or deploy an API using what’s already in place. Skills, approval policies and audit controls keep those actions in check. Instead of rebuilding for AI, organizations can put agents to work on the systems they already depend on. 

Scaling agents with NVIDIA
Agent Identity and HashiCorp Vault integrate with NVIDIA OpenShell secure runtime software, the foundation of the NVIDIA OpenShell Architecture. Together, they pair a protected environment for agents to run in with a verified identity and short-lived credentials for every agent, so each action can be traced, limited and reviewed. 

“Businesses need enforceable control over how agents operate and what they can access,” said John Fanelli, vice president, enterprise software, NVIDIA. “Our work with IBM combines NVIDIA OpenShell’s policy-governed runtime with Agent Identity and HashiCorp Vault to help enterprises scale AI agents with secure execution, verified identities and tightly scoped access to business systems.” 

Responding to Emerging Security Threats
When new vulnerabilities are discovered, enterprises must quickly identify affected systems, determine required changes and deploy fixes without disrupting critical operations. In complex environments, this process often involves multiple teams, tools and processes. 

IBM Concert integrates observability, optimization, incident management and security across applications, infrastructure and networks. With AI-powered insights and proof of exploitability, Concert helps teams to identify high-risk vulnerabilities, assess operational impact, and coordinate responses. These capabilities also help organizations address performance, manage costs and maintain resilience in hybrid environments. 

HashiCorp Terraform provides an infrastructure context and governed workflows for change implementation. New features now generally available and in public preview, including Terraform policy, Terraform Developer Portal and Terraform remote MCP server, enable developers and AI agents to access approved configurations and implement infrastructure changes through established controls. Terraform powered by Infragraph also helps teams understand infrastructure relationships and dependencies for more informed decisions. 

Together, these capabilities enable organizations to progress from identifying vulnerabilities to implementing and verifying remediation, while optimizing the visibility and governance essential for enterprise operations. 

A comprehensive system intelligence and change orchestration layer for IBM Z 
IBM Z Atlas maps a client’s entire z/OS stack across infrastructure, middleware, and applications, and then uses that intelligence to address the manual effort of tasks like patch management, regulatory response, and sharing system knowledge across teams, from systems programmers to application developers. Atlas addresses the leading cause of unplanned z/OS outages – changes that aren’t proven to be safe – by mapping how a change impacts the z/OS stack and testing and validating it. This design (in tech preview) accelerates clients’ modernization efforts by keeping experts in control and giving practitioners, in operations or development, the same shared Z system visibility to reduce risk. 

Availability
HashiCorp Vault 2.2, Agent Identity, watsonx Orchestrate evaluate capabilities, IBM Concert, and HashiCorp Terraform policy are generally available. Secure Hub, Terraform Developer Portal, Terraform remote MCP server, and IBM Z Atlas are in public preview. IBM Integration Intelligence Hub and watsonx Orchestrate discover and contain capabilities are in tech preview. 

Statements regarding IBM’s future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice and represent goals and objectives only. 

Learn more
IBM TechXchange is IBM’s annual conference for developers and technology practitioners and brings together nearly 6,500 attendees from 85 countries. This year, the event incorporates HashiConf to bring together the HashiCorp community with practitioners from across IBM, Red Hat and Confluent. Attendees can choose from more than 1,000 sessions and experiences, including 180 hands-on labs, 260 client-led sessions and more than 50 certification exams. Speakers include American Airlines, Bradesco, Citi, CVS Health, Deutsche Bank, DoorDash, Hertz, and US Bancorp who will share how they are making AI enterprise ready. 

Session livestream and replays will be available here: ibm.biz/txc26-livestream.  

Supporting Materials

Strengthen security for agentic AI with new Vault, Verify, Boundary, and Secure Hub capabilities  IBM Agent Identity now generally available: Building Trust for the Agentic Era  Vault Enterprise 2.2 advances identity security, PKI, and cryptoagility  Announcing the public preview of Secure Hub: govern Vault at scale  IBM watsonx Orchestrate advances AI agent management with new capabilities  IBM Integration Intelligence Hub gives AI the context to act, not just access IBM Concert platform advances the path to cross-domain agentic IT operations  Terraform advances infrastructure lifecycle management for the agentic era Introducing IBM Z Atlas: Change Intelligence for IBM Z 

[1]: Gartner Identifies Six Steps to Manage AI Agent Sprawl
[2]: HashiCorp Vault client stories  

About IBM  
IBM is a leading provider of global hybrid cloud and AI, and consulting expertise. We help clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Thousands of governments and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM’s hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently and securely. IBM’s breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and consulting deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM’s long-standing commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity and service. Visit www.ibm.com for more information. 

Media contacts:

Sarah Benchaita
IBM
sarah.benchaita@ibm.com

Kate Lehman
IBM
Kate.Lehman@ibm.com 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/ibm-introduces-identity-and-control-for-ai-agents-securing-frontier-intelligence-for-the-enterprise-302920162.html

Continue Reading

Technology

Three Blind Spots Leave Industrial Companies Exposed to Critical Mineral Shortages

Published

on

By

Boston Consulting Group Finds Industrial Companies Underestimate Their Critical Mineral Exposure, Which Also Limits Their Access to Public CapitalDemand for Key Minerals Is Projected at 120% to 250% of Forecast Supply Through 2040An Estimated $3.5 Trillion of Products Depend on Gallium, a “Mosquito Mineral” Traded in a Market Under $350 Million a YearSome Governments Have Deployed Less Than 10% of Their Critical Minerals Funds

BOSTON, Oct. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Industrial companies are underestimating their exposure to critical mineral shortages and missing a strategic opportunity as a result, according to new analysis from Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Three blind spots in the metrics that companies rely on hide where the risk sits, including what BCG calls “mosquito minerals,” so small by traded value that they never reach a risk register.

These are among the findings of Why Critical Mineral Shortages Are a CEO Issue, a BCG report released today. BCG’s proprietary model projects demand for key inputs, including rare earths, graphite, copper and lithium, at roughly 120% to 250% of forecast supply through 2040.

“Most industrials track exposure through spend and direct supplier data, and the minerals that can stop a production line are often the ones they spend almost nothing on,” said Tycho Möncks, a BCG managing director and partner and a coauthor of the report. “The question for CEOs and boards is not whether their company is exposed. It is. The question is whether they intend to live with that exposure or turn it into an advantage.”

Small Markets Can Stall Large Industries

Companies often start their risk assessment with the bill of materials, which points them toward high-volume metals such as copper and lithium. Mosquito minerals fall outside that view. Their traded value is tiny, but the value chains that depend on them are not.

Rare earths. The rare earths used in a fighter jet are worth less than the paint that coats the plane.Gallium. The global market is worth under $350 million a year, with production of only about 900 tons, yet BCG estimates about $3.5 trillion of final products depend on it.Arsenic. The upstream market is about $50 million worldwide, yet a single producer supplies roughly 60% of the ultra-high-purity grade used in 5G and 6G infrastructure, data center optics, radar systems, and defense electronics.Byproduct supply. Gallium, germanium and arsenic are recovered as byproducts of other mining and industrial processes, so the host metal’s market sets their supply. Even a sharp price spike may not bring new production.

Exposure Hides Below Tier One Suppliers

A company that buys almost no critical minerals directly can still be acutely exposed because minerals arrive embedded in motors, magnets, power modules, lasers and sensors. They also sit in the tools and processes used to make those components, from crucibles and catalysts to dies and the capital equipment itself.

Turbine blades, engine blocks and structural aerospace components, for example, are machined with cutting tools made of tungsten carbide bonded with cobalt. A manufacturer that has never bought either metal directly can still see production stop if those tools run short, a dependency that appears on no bill of materials.

Companies also tend to map where critical minerals are mined, but for some minerals the bottleneck is processing, not production. A map of where assets sit and a map of who owns them can look very different, so a change of supplier that looks like diversification may leave a company’s exposure unchanged.

Public Capital Is Committed but Largely Unspent

The three blind spots also lead to a strategic miss. The International Energy Agency reports that public finance commitments to critical minerals in advanced economies reached around $65 billion in 2025, more than four times the 2023 level. BCG’s review of government-backed vehicles found the flagship instruments barely deployed, with some countries having spent less than 10% of their allocated capital and others nothing.

These vehicles are designed to draw in private capital, and offtake requirements are typically the main eligibility gate. BCG argues that companies without a clear view of their own exposure cannot make a credible commitment, and so cannot qualify. The funds are not free money: they carry conditions such as reporting obligations and localization requirements, and they represent only about one tenth of the capital needed through 2040. But for industrial companies, BCG says, they are a way to build a competitive advantage.

Several of the companies that have reframed their approach and tapped public capital are industrial companies and trading firms, not miners, and BCG found that in each case the CEO and executive team led the process of identifying and correcting their blind spots.

“These blind spots have a cost beyond risk. The money is there, but it comes with offtake requirements, and a company cannot make a credible commitment without knowing its own exposure,” said Karthik Valluru, a BCG managing director and senior partner who coauthored the report. “Mapping that exposure properly is where the opportunity starts.”

Download the publication here:

https://www.bcg.com/publications/2026/critical-minerals-risk-blind-spots

Media Contact: 
Bruce Wraight
wraight.bruce@bcg.com 

About Boston Consulting Group
Boston Consulting Group bridges the gap between ambition and outcomes for the world’s leading companies and organizations. We are built for this era of unprecedented change — bringing strategic clarity rooted in over 60 years of deep domain knowledge, combined with applied AI shaped by our practitioners. BCG works shoulder-to-shoulder with CEOs across industries and geographies to deliver transformative impact at scale: stronger returns, transferred capabilities, and change that sticks. For more information, visit bcg.com.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/three-blind-spots-leave-industrial-companies-exposed-to-critical-mineral-shortages-302920029.html

SOURCE Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

Continue Reading

Trending