New research finds more than 8 in 10 U.S. adults 50+ surveyed would consider leaving a company when automation leaves no way to reach a human, underscoring a service model that uses AI to support, not replace, human help.
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz., Oct. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — As companies race to deploy artificial intelligence across customer service departments, new research from Consumer Cellular suggests there may be a hidden cost to getting automation wrong: customers.
More than 8 in 10 U.S. adults 50+ surveyed, across both Consumer Cellular customer and prospect communities, said they would consider leaving a company if an automated system kept them in a loop with no way to reach a human.
Consumer Cellular’s findings align with broader customer-service research showing that consumers may value useful AI while still expecting a clear path to human help. In a 2026 Gartner survey of 3,566 B2B and B2C customers, 50% said customer-service interactions are easier when companies use generative AI, but 87% said companies using GenAI for customer service must provide access to a human agent.*
“AI isn’t the problem. Bad customer service is,” said Ed Evans, CEO of Consumer Cellular. “We’re investing in AI to give our teams better information and remove friction, not to get customers off the phone as quickly as possible. Our goal is to make sure customers get the help they need and the best experience possible, whether that takes two minutes or twenty.”
The findings reinforce the company’s philosophy that AI should give customers more ways to get help, not fewer, and point to a model for customer service in which AI makes human support more effective while preserving easy access to the people customers rely on when they need help.
Key Findings
Bad automation can cost companies customers. Sixty-two percent of Consumer Cellular customers surveyed and 51% of prospects said a frustrating bot experience makes them less likely to stay with a company. Forty-seven percent of customers and 31% of prospects said they have switched providers or seriously considered switching because of a bad automated experience.Customers expect a clear path to a person. Ninety-seven percent of Consumer Cellular customers surveyed and 94% of prospects agreed there should always be an option to speak with a human agent. When automation removes that option, the consequences can be significant: More than 8 in 10 across both groups surveyed would consider leaving a company over an automated loop with no way to reach a human (87% of customers and 82% of prospects).Resolution and human access matter far more than speed. Among Consumer Cellular customers surveyed, 43% said getting their problem completely resolved matters most when seeking help and another 43% chose talking to a real, live person. Just 4% chose speed. Among prospects, 53% chose complete resolution, 32% chose reaching a real person and just 3% chose speed.Chatbots often don’t finish the job. Roughly three in five customers and prospects surveyed said a chatbot successfully resolves their issue less than 40% of the time. Thirty-eight percent of customers and 44% of prospects said bots resolve their issue less than 10% of the time.Customers are more forgiving of impersonal automation than ineffective automation. Just 9% of customers and 10% of prospects would consider leaving because a bot successfully resolved their issue but felt “cold and robotic.” By comparison, more than 8 in 10 would consider leaving over an automated loop with no way to reach a human.
AI in Practice
Consumer Cellular is putting that philosophy into practice by using AI to give its customer-service representatives better tools and information, while continuing to invest in what has long differentiated its customer experience: easy access to its 100% U.S.-based customer support team.
Behind the scenes, AI is being used to help representatives focus more fully on customers and expand individualized coaching:
Helping representatives focus on the customer: An AI-powered auto-summarization tool generates a recap of each customer call, allowing representatives to focus more fully on listening to and engaging with the customer rather than simultaneously taking detailed account notes. Representatives can then review and supplement the AI-generated summary after the interaction.Expanding individualized coaching: Consumer Cellular is also using AI to expand representative coaching. Traditionally, only a small fraction of customer interactions could be individually reviewed. AI allows the company to analyze a substantially larger share of interactions and provide more individualized feedback to representatives. Coaching feedback is delivered by supervisors, and AI insights are one input, not a substitute for human judgment.
Customer information used by these tools is protected under our Privacy Policy and is not used to train third-party AI models.
Customer Service Performance
That service model is reflected in how Consumer Cellular customers view their experience. In the same research, 77% of Consumer Cellular customers surveyed said they were confident their carrier would fully resolve their issue the first time they reached out, compared with 44% of prospects surveyed who said the same of their current carrier.
Consumer Cellular also reports strong performance across several key customer-service measures, reflecting a model that prioritizes resolution and customer experience over simply shortening interactions:
First-contact resolution (FCR): CCI records indicate ~86%Customer satisfaction (CSAT): 5 points above the value MVNO average, 7 points above the industry average, 8 points above the major network operators.**Average handle time (AHT): 11.6% longer than the industry benchmark,*** reflecting the company’s focus on giving customers the time they need rather than rushing them off the phone.
Consumer Cellular was ranked #1 in Network Coverage and #1 in Customer Satisfaction among wireless carriers from ACSI in 2026 and #1 in Customer Service from USA TODAY (2025-2026).
Research Methodology
The research was conducted on the Switchboard Hive Platform by Big Village among Consumer Cellular customer and prospect communities aged 50 and older. Prospects were primarily current customers of AT&T (26%), Verizon (26%), and T-Mobile (22%). The research included 217 Consumer Cellular customers (128 ages 50–69 and 89 ages 70+) and 265 prospects (194 ages 50–69 and 71 ages 70+), for a total of 482 respondents. Research activities were fielded June 25 and July 2, 2026.
For additional research findings and methodology, visit AI Customer Service Study.
About Consumer Cellular
Founded in 1995, Consumer Cellular is the first wireless provider built for Americans 50+. An approved wireless partner of AARP, the company is trusted by more than 4 million subscribers for affordable plans, popular devices, and nationwide coverage, all backed by 100% U.S.-based customer support. Based in Scottsdale, Arizona, the company was ranked #1 in Network Coverage and #1 in Customer Satisfaction among wireless carriers from ACSI in 2026 and #1 in Customer Service from USA TODAY (2025-2026).
Press Contact:
alana.kornfeld@consumercellular.com
Sources:
* Gartner, August 2026 survey.
** American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), 2026.
*** Sprinklr, citing Call Centre Helper industry benchmarks. Telecommunications average handle time: 8.8 minutes.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/consumer-alert-the-ai-customer-service-race-could-be-costing-companies-customers-302913632.html
SOURCE Consumer Cellular
Technology4 days ago
Coin Market5 days ago
Near Videos4 days ago
Technology5 days ago
Technology3 days ago