NEW YORK, Sept. 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI) today announced the completion of the divestment of its geoscience and petroleum engineering software portfolio to Schlumberger (SLB), a global technology company driving energy innovation across more than 100 countries.

As part of the transaction, S&P Global Energy will continue to distribute its leading proprietary data through the divested geoscience and petroleum engineering workflow tools. 

“With this transaction complete, S&P Global Energy’s upstream business will remain sharply focused on delivering world-class data and insights to global energy markets,” said Dave Ernsberger, President, S&P Global Energy. “Our strategic alliance with SLB means our customers can continue to access S&P Global Energy data through the tools they use every day, and the launch of Titan, our AI-powered upstream data platform, will set a new standard for how the industry discovers, analyzes, and acts on data.”

The transaction, originally announced in April 2026, establishes a strategic alliance that ensures customers will continue to benefit from S&P Global Energy’s comprehensive data and insights within the workflows they rely on daily.

Financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed, and the divestiture is not expected to have a material impact on the financial results of S&P Global, or the Energy division.

Media Contacts:

Josh Goldstein
S&P Global Energy
+1 954-254-4900
josh.goldstein@spglobal.com 

Orla O’Brien
S&P Global
+1 857-407-8559
orla.obrien@spglobal.com

About S&P Global
S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI) enables businesses, governments, and individuals with trusted data, expertise and technology to make decisions with conviction. We are Advancing Essential Intelligence through world-leading benchmarks, data, and insights that customers need in order to plan confidently, act decisively and thrive in a rapidly changing global landscape.

From helping our customers assess new investments across the capital and commodities markets to navigating the energy expansion, acceleration of artificial intelligence, and evolution of public and private markets, we enable the world’s leading organizations to unlock opportunities, solve challenges and plan for tomorrow – today. Learn more at www.spglobal.com.

About S&P Global Energy
At S&P Global Energy (formerly S&P Global Commodity Insights), our comprehensive view of global energy and commodities markets enables our customers to make superior decisions and create long-term, sustainable value. Our four core capabilities are: Platts for pricing and news; CERA for research and advisory; Horizons for energy expansion and sustainability solutions; and Events for industry collaboration. S&P Global Energy is a division of S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI). Learn more at www.spglobal.com/energy.

About SLB
SLB is a global technology company that has driven energy innovation for 100 years. With a global presence in more than 100 countries and employees representing almost twice as many nationalities, we work each day on innovating oil and gas, delivering digital at scale, decarbonizing industries, and developing and scaling new energy systems that accelerate the energy transition.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which express management’s current views concerning future events, trends, contingencies or results, appear at various places in this press release and use words like “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “strategy,” “target” and similar terms, and future or conditional tense verbs like “could,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “will” and “would.” For example, management may use forward-looking statements when addressing topics such as: the outcome of contingencies; future actions by regulators; changes in the Company’s business strategies and methods of generating revenue; the development and performance of the Company’s services and products; the expected impact of acquisitions and dispositions; the Company’s effective tax rates; and the Company’s cost structure, dividend policy, cash flows or liquidity.

Forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements include, among other things:

worldwide economic, financial, political, regulatory, and geopolitical conditions (including slower GDP growth or recession, restrictions on trade (e.g., tariffs and disruptions to shipping in connection with the military conflict in the Middle East), instability in the banking sector and inflation), and factors that contribute to uncertainty and volatility (e.g., supply chain risk), geopolitical uncertainty (including military conflict), natural and man-made disasters, civil unrest, public health crises (e.g., pandemics), and conditions that result from legislative, regulatory, trade and policy changes, including from the U.S. administration;the volatility and health of debt, equity, commodities and energy markets, including credit quality and spreads, the composition and mix of credit maturity profiles, the level of liquidity and future debt issuances, equity flows from active to passive, fluctuations in average asset prices in global equities, demand for investment products that track indices and assessments and trading volumes of certain exchange traded derivatives;the demand and market for credit ratings in and across the sectors and geographies where the Company operates;the Company’s ability to maintain adequate physical, technical and administrative safeguards to protect the security of confidential information and data, or protect against a system or network disruption that results in regulatory penalties and remedial costs or improper disclosure of confidential information or data;the outcome of litigation, government and regulatory proceedings, investigations and inquiries;concerns in the marketplace affecting the Company’s credibility or otherwise affecting market perceptions of the integrity or utility of independent credit ratings, benchmarks, indices and other services;the level of merger and acquisition activity in the United States and abroad;the level of the Company’s future cash flows and capital investments;the effect of competitive products (including those incorporating artificial intelligence (“AI”)) and pricing, including the level of success of new product developments and global expansion;the impact of customer cost-cutting pressures;a decline in the demand for our products and services by our customers and other market participants;our ability to develop new products or technologies, to integrate our products with new technologies (e.g., AI), or to compete with new products or technologies offered by new or existing competitors;the introduction of competing products (including those developed by AI) or technologies by other companies; our ability to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use and infringement, including by others using AI technologies, and to operate our business without violating third-party intellectual property rights, including through our own use of AI in our products and services;our ability to attract, incentivize and retain key employees, especially in a competitive business environment;our ability to successfully navigate key organizational changes;the continuously evolving regulatory environment in Europe, the United States and elsewhere around the globe affecting each of our businesses and the products they offer, and our compliance therewith;the Company’s exposure to potential criminal sanctions or civil penalties for noncompliance with foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that are applicable in the jurisdictions in which it operates, including sanctions laws relating to countries such as Iran, Russia and Venezuela, anti-corruption laws such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials, as well as import and export restrictions;the Company’s ability to make acquisitions and dispositions and successfully integrate the businesses we acquire;consolidation of the Company’s customers, suppliers or competitors;the ability of the Company, and its third-party service providers, to maintain adequate physical and technological infrastructure;the Company’s ability to successfully recover from a disaster or other business continuity problem, such as an earthquake, hurricane, flood, civil unrest, protests, military conflict, terrorist attack, outbreak of pandemic or contagious diseases, security breach, cyber attack, data breach, power loss, telecommunications failure or other natural or man-made event;the impact on the Company’s revenue and net income caused by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;the impact of changes in applicable tax or accounting requirements on the Company;the ability of the separation of Mobility Global to qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes;any disruption to the Company’s business in connection with the separation of Mobility Global; andany loss of synergies from separating the businesses of Mobility Global and the Company that adversely impact the results of operations of both businesses, or the companies resulting from the separation of Mobility Global not realizing all of the expected benefits of the separation.

The factors noted above are not exhaustive. The Company and its subsidiaries operate in a dynamic business environment in which new risks emerge frequently. Accordingly, the Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which it is made, except as required by applicable law. Further information about the Company’s businesses, including information about factors that could materially affect its results of operations and financial condition, is contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC, including Item 1A, Risk Factors in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sp-global-completes-divestiture-of-upstream-energy-software-portfolio-to-slb-302866534.html

SOURCE S&P Global

CHARLOTTE, N.C., Sept. 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Signature Wealth is pleased to announce that Phil Salice is serving clients as a Wealth Advisor in the firm’s Charlotte office. With experience across M&A, private credit, and private equity, Salice brings a multidisciplinary perspective to helping individuals, families, and business owners navigate important financial decisions and major transitions.

Salice’s path to Signature Wealth began nearly a decade ago, when, at 20 years old, he landed a one-day-a-week internship with John Chidwick, Owner of Signature Wealth Charlotte and Senior Wealth Advisor. He went on to graduate summa cum laude from the Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC Chapel Hill before building a career advising on healthcare and life sciences M&A at Harris Williams, working in private equity at Carousel Capital, and financing sponsor-backed companies on Barings’ Global Private Finance team. Throughout that time, he remained in touch with Chidwick about the possibility of eventually working together.

“My goal is simple: to become a trusted advisor and long-term thought partner to the individuals, families, and businesses we serve,” said Salice. “I’m especially excited to use my background to help clients think through the decisions that often come at the most important points in their financial lives. I’m incredibly grateful to John for the opportunity to join his team in Charlotte.”

Salice joined Signature Wealth’s Charlotte office in December 2025 and spent his first months completing his securities licensing exams while shadowing Chidwick’s client meetings. He is now working directly with clients and taking on greater responsibility across the firm’s wealth advisory relationships.

His experience is particularly relevant when clients are navigating significant financial transitions, from the growth or sale of a business to succession planning, liquidity events, concentrated wealth, or other complex financial decisions. At the same time, Salice’s focus extends beyond business owners, with an emphasis on helping individuals and families make thoughtful decisions around their wealth, both today and across generations.

“Ultimately, I want to build lasting relationships with clients and serve them from a faith-driven perspective. That is where I see myself long-term.” Phil and his wife, Amanda, live in Charlotte, NC and he credits her with fully supporting the decision to join Signature Wealth. For both Phil and Amanda, the opportunity represents more than a career move. It’s an opportunity to help individuals and families build, protect, and pass on what they have worked hard to create.

“Phil is just a great guy,” said Chidwick. “I’ve known him for years, and he’s been persistent and consistent in staying in touch while he built his career at other firms. The timing was finally right for both of us, and he joined us in Charlotte. I’m really grateful to have him, and I’m certain he’ll be an incredible asset to this team for the long term.”

521 East Morehead Street, Suite 150, Charlotte, NC 28202 | (704) 333-6441

Signature Wealth Group is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment Advisory Services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

Media Contact: Bobbie Adkins, Chief Marketing Officer, bobbie@signaturewealth.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/phil-salice-promoted-to-wealth-advisor-months-after-joining-signature-wealth-charlotte-302866544.html

SOURCE Signature Wealth Group

The article reviews how medical school learning pathways shape classroom instruction, clinical preparation, and student success.

ERIE, Pa., Sept. 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — What learning environment best supports success during medical school? A HelloNation article answers the question through insights from Medical School Expert Dr. Silvia M. Ferretti of Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine in Erie, Pennsylvania.

The article explains that medical school learning pathways can vary significantly between programs, even though all schools teach the same core scientific concepts required for patient care. Different approaches to medical education influence how students study, interact with instructors, prepare for exams, and develop clinical reasoning skills throughout their training.

Traditional lecture-based learning remains one of the most widely used educational models in medical education. According to the article, this approach provides students with structured schedules and direct instruction from professors during organized classroom sessions. Students who prefer clear expectations and independent review often perform well in lecture-based learning environments. The article notes that this format also allows information to be presented in a logical sequence, which many students find helpful during demanding medical coursework.

Small group discussion has become another common component of many medical school learning pathways. In these settings, students work together to review patient cases, discuss treatment strategies, and analyze medical concepts with guidance from faculty members. The article explains that small group discussion encourages active participation while helping students strengthen communication and critical thinking abilities. Students who enjoy collaborative learning may find this approach especially engaging compared to lecture-focused instruction alone.

Problem-based learning is also highlighted throughout the article as an increasingly popular educational model. Rather than focusing primarily on memorization, problem-based learning places students in realistic clinical scenarios where they must research conditions, identify symptoms, and develop treatment plans as a team. The article explains that this method encourages independent learning while helping students better understand the decision-making challenges physicians face during patient care.

Systems-based education represents another important approach discussed in the article. This pathway organizes instruction around body systems such as cardiovascular, respiratory, or digestive health instead of separating subjects into individual courses. Students learn anatomy, pathology, physiology, and pharmacology together within each system. Medical School Expert Dr. Silvia M. Ferretti explains in the article that systems-based education may help students connect scientific concepts more effectively while preparing for clinical practice.

Hybrid learning models are also becoming more common throughout medical education. The article describes hybrid learning as a flexible combination of lecture-based learning, online coursework, simulation exercises, and small group discussion. Students may complete portions of their coursework independently online while participating in hands-on training sessions in person. According to the article, hybrid learning can help students manage demanding schedules while gaining experience with multiple educational styles during medical school.

The HelloNation article emphasizes that learning pathways can significantly affect student confidence, stress management, and classroom engagement. Some students thrive in collaborative environments that encourage discussion and teamwork, while others perform better within highly structured programs focused on lectures and independent study. Understanding personal learning preferences may help students choose programs that better support long-term academic success.

Clinical preparation also plays a major role in the discussion. The article explains that programs incorporating simulation training, early patient interaction, or problem-based learning may help students feel more prepared during clinical rotations. Exposure to realistic medical scenarios early in training can strengthen communication abilities and improve clinical reasoning skills before students begin direct patient care responsibilities.

The article concludes that as medical education continues evolving, schools are offering increasingly diverse learning pathways to support different student needs. Understanding these educational models before applying may help future physicians select programs aligned with their learning style, career goals, and personal strengths.

Different Medical School Learning Styles Explained features insights from Dr. Silvia M. Ferretti, Medical School Expert of Erie, Pennsylvania, in HelloNation.

About HelloNation

HelloNation is America’s Good News Network, a premier media platform built on the idea that good news travels faster when real people tell real stories. Through its community-focused digital publications and innovative “edvertising” approach, HelloNation delivers expert-driven, good-news content that informs, inspires, and spotlights the leaders making a meaningful impact in their communities.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/in-hellonation-medical-school-expert-dr-silvia-m-ferretti-explains-different-medical-school-learning-styles-302866549.html

SOURCE HelloNation