Connect with us

Technology

GSE Systems Reports Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results

Published

on

COLUMBIA, Md., Aug. 14, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — GSE Systems, Inc. (“GSE Solutions”, “GSE”, or “the Company”) (Nasdaq: GVP), a leader in advanced engineering and workforce solutions that support the future of clean energy production and decarbonization initiatives of the nuclear power industry, today announced financial results for the second quarter (“Q2”) ended June 30, 2024.

Q2 2024 and Recent Highlights

Improved gross profit growth driven by Engineering segment, with a 14% increase over Q1 of 2024 and Q2 of 2023.Achieved positive Adjusted EBITDA for the first half of 2024, due to continued strong performance from our Engineering segment and diligent operating expense management.Backlog at June 30, 2024, was $34.7 million, including $30.4 million of Engineering backlog, and $4.3 million of Workforce Solutions backlog.Ended Q2 with cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $2.7 million, including restricted cash of $1.5 million.Subsequent to Q2 end, GSE entered into definitive merger agreement to be acquired by Pelican Energy Partners.

Management Commentary

Ravi Khanna, President & Chief Executive Officer of GSE, commented, “I am pleased with the second quarter results, which showed the execution of our strategic plan of improved utilization, which resulted in improved gross profit margin and continued diligence on expense controls. This combination led the company to report positive adjusted EBITDA of $0.6 million during the quarter. While the company is operating at an efficient level, order flow in the quarter was a bit softer, which reflects that the industry continues to recover at a cautious pace. We continue to see potential order flow at a respectable level, but also are experiencing continued timing issues, as projects are consistently getting pushed to the right. Considering where we are in the current cycle, the company has entered into a definitive agreement with Pelican Energy Partners and believes it to be highly beneficial  for GSE shareholders, customers and employees. I will miss communicating with shareholders as we move forward with Pelican to navigate and provide value to the nuclear power industry.”

Q2 2024 FINANCIAL RESULTS

Revenue during Q2 2024 was $11.7 million an increase of $0.4 million compared to $11.3 million in Q1 2024, and revenue was $12.4 million in Q2 2023. The sequential improvement in revenues was primarily driven by our Design & Analysis business due to additional training and consulting work for new customers, offset by a sequential decrease in Workforce Solutions. The year-over-year decrease of $0.7 million was primarily due to the Workforce Solutions segment which saw a  reduction of staffing needs from  major customers.

Engineering revenue was $9.3 million in Q2 2024 compared to $8.7 million in Q1 2024, and $9.0 million in Q2 2023. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to our Design & Analysis business due to additional training & consulting work for new customers.

Workforce Solutions revenue was $2.4 million in Q2 2024 compared to $2.6 million in Q1 2024, and $3.3 million in Q2 2023. The sequential and year-over-year decreases are mainly due to the reduction in workforce requirements.

Gross profit in Q2 2024 was $3.7 million, or 31.3% of revenue. This compared to gross profit of $3.2 million, or 26.0% of revenue in Q2 2023, and $3.2 million, or 28.5% of revenue in Q1 2024. The increase in gross margin was primarily related to the Engineering segment’s revenue growth as well as the increased project efficiency which produced higher margins in the quarter.

Operating expenses in Q2 2024 were $3.4 million compared to $4.0 million in Q2 2023. Operating expenses were $4.7 million in Q1 2024. Operating expenses were lower due to an improved corporate cost structure. The Company continues to maintain tight expense controls despite inflationary pressures.  

Operating income (loss) was approximately $0.3 million in Q2 2024, compared $(0.8) million in Q2 2023. Operating loss was $(1.5) million in Q1 2024.

Net loss in Q2 2024 was $(0.9) million or $(0.26) per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss of $(1.5) million or $(0.62) per basic and diluted share in Q2 2023. Net loss was $(2.0) million or $(0.63) per basic and diluted share in Q1 2024.

Adjusted net income1 totaled $0.1 million, or $0.02 per diluted share in Q2 2024, compared to adjusted net loss of $(1.3) million, or $(0.53) per diluted share, in Q2 2023. Adjusted net loss1 totaled $(1.1) million, or $(0.35) per diluted share in Q1 2024.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for Q2 2024 was approximately $(0.3) million, compared to $(0.4) million in Q2 2023. EBITDA for Q1 2024 was approximately $(1.2) million.

Adjusted EBITDA1 totaled $0.6 million in Q2 2024, compared to $(0.4) million in Q2 2023. Adjusted EBITDA1 totaled $(0.4) million in Q1 2024.

Backlog at June 30, 2024, was $34.7 million, including $30.4 million of Engineering backlog, and $4.3 million of Workforce Solutions.

1 Refer to the non-GAAP reconciliation tables at the end of this press release for a definition of “EBITDA”, “adjusted EBITDA” and “adjusted net income”.

CONFERENCE CALL

Due to the impending transaction with Pelican, GSE Systems will not be conducting a conference call.

ABOUT GSE SOLUTIONS

Proven by more than 50 years of experience in the nuclear power industry, GSE knows what it takes to help customers deliver carbon-free electricity safely and reliably. Today, GSE Solutions leverages top talent, expertise, and technology to help energy facilities achieve next-level power plant performance. GSE’s advanced Engineering and Workforce Solutions divisions offer highly specialized training, engineering design, program compliance, simulation, and technical staffing that reduce risk and optimize plant operations. With more than 1,100 installations and hundreds of customers in over 50 countries, GSE delivers operational excellence. www.gses.com.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS 

We make statements in this press release that are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements reflect our current expectations concerning future events and results. We use words such as “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, but their absence does not mean a statement is not forward-looking. These statements are not guarantees of our future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other important factors that could cause our actual performance or achievements to be materially different from those we project. For a full discussion of these risks, uncertainties, and factors, we encourage you to read our documents on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those set forth in our periodic reports under the forward-looking statements and risk factors sections. We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Company Contact

Investor Contact

Ravi Khanna

Lytham Partners

Chief Executive Officer

Adam Lowensteiner, Vice President

GSE Systems, Inc.

(646) 829-9702

(410) 970-7800

gvp@lythampartners.com

 

GSE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share and per share data) 

Three Months ended

Six Months ended

June 30,

June 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

Revenue

$11,725

$12,387

$23,008

$23,260

   Cost of revenue

8,051

9,172

16,118

17,650

Gross profit

3,674

3,215

6,890

5,610

Selling, general and administrative

3,070

3,653

7,430

8,441

Research and development

118

154

347

335

Restructuring charges

64

64

Depreciation

50

53

108

101

Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets

83

131

182

292

Total operating expenses

3,385

3,991

8,131

9,169

Operating income (loss)

289

(776)

(1,241)

(3,559)

Interest expense, net

(258)

(767)

(717)

(1,053)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net

(736)

171

(753)

240

Other (loss) income, net

(47)

(98)

7

(88)

Loss before income taxes

(752)

(1,470)

(2,704)

(4,460)

Expense (benefit) from income taxes

102

28

142

(11)

Net loss

$(854)

$(1,498)

$(2,846)

$(4,449)

Net (loss) income per common share – basic
and diluted

$(0.26)

$(0.62)

$(0.89)

$(1.89)

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
and diluted 

3,258,124

2,418,827

3,203,465

2,356,413

 

GSE SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30, 2024

December 31, 2023

(unaudited)

(audited)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

1,254

$

2,250

Restricted cash, current

379

378

Contract receivables, net of allowance for credit loss

9,391

10,166

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

553

879

Total current assets

11,577

13,673

Equipment, software and leasehold improvements, net

650

754

Software development costs, net

761

750

Goodwill

4,908

4,908

Intangible assets, net

997

1,179

Restricted cash – long term

1,086

1,083

Operating lease right-of-use assets, net

297

413

Other assets

45

45

Total assets

$

20,321

$

22,805

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Current portion of long-term note

1,200

810

Accounts payable

2,388

3,300

Accrued expenses

1,768

1,053

Accrued legal settlements

529

1,010

Accrued compensation

2,146

1,086

Billings in excess of revenue earned

4,974

5,119

Accrued warranty

166

176

Income taxes payable

1,776

1,701

Derivative liabilities

1,861

1,132

Other current liabilities

358

956

Total current liabilities

17,166

16,343

Long-term note, less current portion

637

Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent

301

357

Other noncurrent liabilities

80

126

Total liabilities

17,547

17,463

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
and outstanding

Common stock $0.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 3,466,522 and
3,194,030 shares issued, 3,306,631 and 3,034,139 shares outstanding,
respectively

34

32

Additional paid-in capital

87,253

86,983

Accumulated deficit

(81,554)

(78,708)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

40

34

Treasury stock at cost, 159,891 shares

(2,999)

(2,999)

Total stockholders’ equity

2,774

5,342

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

20,321

$

22,805

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation (in thousands)

References to “EBITDA” mean net (loss) income, before considering interest expense, expense (benefit) from provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization. References to Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation expense and the impact of the change in fair value of derivative instruments. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of financial performance under U.S. GAAP. Management believes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to operating profit, net income and other U.S. GAAP measures, are useful to investors to evaluate the Company’s results because it excludes certain items that are not directly related to the Company’s core operating performance that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on our results for any particular period. Investors should recognize that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA might not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies. This measure should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, any measure of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of non-U.S. GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G follows:

Three Months ended

Six Months ended

June 30,

June 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

Net loss

$(854)

$(1,498)

$(2,846)

$(4,449)

Interest expense, net

258

767

717

1,053

Expense (benefit) from income taxes

102

28

142

(11)

Depreciation and amortization

228

267

487

560

EBITDA

(266)

(436)

(1,500)

(2,847)

Stock-based compensation expense

(274)

246

20

531

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net

736

(171)

753

(240)

Restructuring charges

64

64

Advisory fees

300

776

Adjusted EBITDA

$560

$(361)

$113

$(2,556)

Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and Adjusted EPS Reconciliation (in thousands, except per share amounts)

References to Adjusted Net Income (Loss) excludes the stock-based compensation expense, the impact of the change in fair value of derivative instruments, and amortization of intangible assets. Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and Adjusted Income (Loss) per Share (adjusted EPS) are not measures of financial performance under U.S. GAAP. Management believes Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and Adjusted Income (Loss) per Share, in addition to other U.S. GAAP measures, are useful to investors to evaluate the Company’s results because they exclude certain items that are not directly related to the Company’s core operating performance and non-cash items that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on our results for any particular period, such as stock-based compensation expense. These measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, any measure of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of non-U.S. GAAP Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and Adjusted Income (Loss) per common Share to U.S. GAAP net loss, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, is as follows:

Three Months ended

Six Months ended

June 30,

June 30,

2024

2023

2024

2023

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited) 

(unaudited)

Net loss

$(854)

$(1,498)

$(2,846)

$(4,449)

Stock-based compensation expense

(274)

246

20

531

Change in fair value of derivative instruments,
net

736

(171)

753

(240)

Restructuring charges

64

64

Advisory fees

300

776

Amortization of intangible assets related to
acquisitions

83

131

182

292

Adjusted net income (loss)

55

(1,292)

(1,051)

(3,866)

Net loss per common share – diluted

(0.26)

(0.62)

(0.89)

(1.89)

Add back: Effect of stock-based compensation

(0.08)

0.11

0.01

0.24

Add back: Effect of change in fair value of
derivative instruments, net

0.22

(0.07)

0.23

(0.11)

Add back: Effect of restructuring charges

0.02

0.02

Add back: Effect of advisory fees

0.09

0.24

Add back: Effect of amortization of intangible
assets related to acquisitions

0.03

0.05

0.06

0.12

Adjusted net income (loss) per common share –
diluted

$0.02

$(0.53)

$(0.33)

$(1.64)

Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted(1)

3,258,124

2,418,827

3,148,806

2,293,389

(1) During the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, we reported a U.S. GAAP net loss and an adjusted net income (loss). Accordingly, there were no dilutive shares from RSUs or other dilutive instruments that are included in the adjusted net income (loss) per share calculation, as all shares were considered anti-dilutive when calculating the net loss per share. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 we reported a U.S. GAAP net income and an adjusted net loss. Accordingly, there were no dilutive shares from RSUs or other dilutive instruments that are included in the adjusted net loss per share calculation, as all shares were considered anti-dilutive when calculating the net loss per share.

 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gse-systems-reports-second-quarter-2024-financial-results-302222774.html

SOURCE GSE Systems, Inc.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Secretary of State Belanger announces expansion of high-speed Internet access in Saskatchewan

Published

on

By

Federal investment of over $141 million will help connect more than 30,000 homes to high–speed Internet

HUMBOLDT, SK, July 24, 2026 /CNW/ — Reliable and affordable high-speed Internet is essential for all Canadians. It enables access to important online resources, connects friends and families, and drives economic growth and innovation. This is why the Government of Canada is helping bring high-speed Internet access to underserved communities–including Indigenous communities–in Saskatchewan.

Today, the Honourable Buckley Belanger, Secretary of State for Rural Development, announced over $141 million in federal funding for six projects to bring high-speed Internet access to more than 30,000 households in over 500 rural and remote communities across Saskatchewan.

This funding is provided through the Universal Broadband Fund, a program designed to ensure that Canadians in rural, remote and Indigenous communities have access to reliable high-speed Internet.

The Government of Canada has committed to ensuring that every household in Canada has access to high-speed Internet by 2030, and it is on track to meet this connectivity target. These projects will build toward that goal, and the government will continue to invest in infrastructure that creates new opportunities and makes sure communities can benefit from all of Canada’s potential.

Quotes

“High-speed Internet is no longer just a luxury–it’s essential infrastructure, no matter where you live in Canada. It’s how people access health care virtually, start a business or just stay in touch with their loved ones. That’s why we made a historic commitment to provide 100% of Canadian households with access to high-speed Internet by 2030. The projects announced today are a major milestone for connectivity in Saskatchewan, providing reliable and affordable high-speed Internet to more than 30,000 underserved homes in over 500 rural and remote communities across the province.”
– The Honourable Buckley Belanger, Secretary of State for Rural Development

“In many rural and remote areas, connectivity projects like these face a number of financial and structural barriers. Federal tools like the Canada Infrastructure Bank help bridge that gap, ensuring critical infrastructure is built where it otherwise would not be. By supporting initiatives like this, we are advancing economic growth today and helping close the connectivity gap for underserved communities well into the future.”
– The Honourable Gregor Robertson, Minister of Housing and Infrastructure and Minister responsible for Pacific Economic Development Canada

“Access to dependable high-speed Internet should not be determined by where people live. Thanks to support from the Government of Canada through the Universal Broadband Fund, RFNOW is delivering the infrastructure needed to connect underserved rural and First Nations communities across Saskatchewan. Together, we are building a stronger digital future that will enhance economic development, support essential services and improve quality of life for thousands of Canadians.”
– Chris Kennedy, Chief Executive Officer, RFNOW Inc.

“Every community deserves the opportunity that comes with access to reliable high-speed Internet–and that’s exactly what this investment delivers. In partnership with the Government of Canada’s Universal Broadband Fund, Xplore is bringing high-speed Internet connectivity to nearly 20,000 homes and businesses in Saskatchewan. Better connectivity means more than faster downloads–it means students can learn without interruption, families can access health care from home, and local businesses can compete on a level playing field.”
– Brent Johnston, Chief Executive Officer, Xplore Inc.

“Since our establishment in 2007, we have been committed to providing dependable Internet service and strengthening connections in the communities we serve. With support from the Government of Canada’s Universal Broadband Fund, we’re excited to expand our network and introduce new 6 GHz fixed wireless technology capable of delivering speeds of up to 1 Gbps. This project will help more residents of rural and remote communities access the reliable high-speed connectivity they need for work, education, health care, business and everyday life.”
– Allen Stafford, President, Stafford Communications Inc.

“Beaver River Broadband has secured federal Universal Broadband Fund support to deliver fibre-to-the-home infrastructure directly to Peepeekisis Cree Nation. This critical investment guarantees gigabit-capable Internet access that will transform local opportunities in digital education, remote health care and community-led economic development. Crucially, the project underscores the importance of partnering with smaller, regional Internet providers that bring deep community roots, agile deployment and a dedicated focus on serving areas that larger national carriers often overlook. As an Indigenous-led regional provider working closely with First Nations, Beaver River Broadband understands the unique needs of the area and delivers tailored, reliable customer support on the ground. Empowering local providers through initiatives like the Universal Broadband Fund ensures that underserved First Nations are not just connected but also supported by partners invested in their long-term digital sovereignty.”
– John DeGraauw, CEO, Beaver River Broadband

“MCSnet’s fibre-to-the-tower expansion in Saskatchewan will deliver fast, highly reliable Internet access to underserved homes in rural Saskatchewan, courtesy of a dedicated, community-invested provider. As a family-owned company based in the Prairies, we have been serving rural communities with our innovative technology and exceptional customer service for over 30 years.”
– Jerome VanBrabant, Chief Projects Officer, MCSnet

Quick facts

Canada’s Connectivity Strategy aims to provide all Canadians with access to Internet speeds of at least 50 megabits per second (Mbps) download / 10 Mbps upload.The Universal Broadband Fund is a $3.225 billion investment by the Government of Canada designed to help provide high-speed Internet access to 98% of Canadian households by the end of 2026 and achieve the national target of 100% access by 2030.Today, 97.4% of Canadian households have access to high-speed Internet, compared to just 79% in 2014.In Saskatchewan, 89.2% of households currently have access to high-speed internet.Since 2015, the Government of Canada has invested $242 million in connectivity projects in Saskatchewan.The Canada Infrastructure Bank has committed more than $2 billion toward digital (broadband) infrastructure, closing last-mile connectivity gaps across Canada.Indigenous women, girls, Two-Spirit individuals and gender diverse people are more likely to go missing or be murdered than non-Indigenous women. Better connectivity means more tools in moments of danger, enabling victims of violence to access critical online resources and get help when they need it most.Building on the Building a Green Prairie Economy Act, the Government of Canada launched the Prairie Partnership Initiative to build a dynamic, sustainable and inclusive economy in the Prairie provinces.

Associated links

Rural economic developmentHigh-Speed Internet Access DashboardUniversal Broadband FundBackgrounder: Universal Broadband Fund and Telesat low Earth orbit capacity agreementCanada Infrastructure Bank: Digital Infrastructure and AIHigh-Speed Access for All: Canada’s Connectivity StrategyNational Broadband MapFederal Pathway to Address Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls and 2SLGBTQQIA+ PeoplePrairie Partnership Initiative

Stay connected

Follow Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada on social media. X (Twitter): @ISED_CA | Facebook: Canadian Innovation | Instagram: @cdninnovation | LinkedIn: Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

For easy access to government programs for businesses, download the Canada Business app.

SOURCE Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

Continue Reading

Technology

Fragmented Web Strategies Leave Organizations Exposed as Digital Expectations Rise, Warns Info-Tech Research Group

Published

on

By

Organizations are increasingly focused on modernizing their digital presence to meet rising user expectations, yet many still rely on decentralized content models, inconsistent governance, and legacy platforms. New findings from Info-Tech Research Group show that without a structured web experience management (WEM) strategy, web initiatives often fail to align with business goals and user needs. The firm’s blueprint Develop Your Web Experience Management Strategy provides a five-phase framework and tools to help IT leaders strengthen governance and align web priorities with organizational objectives.

ARLINGTON, Va., July 24, 2026 /CNW/ — Organizations continue to invest in digital platforms and web modernization efforts, but progress is often limited by unclear priorities, inconsistent ownership, and a lack of shared performance measures. New insights from Info-Tech Research Group indicate that without a clear understanding of web experience maturity and readiness, digital investments fail to translate into consistent and measurable outcomes. The global research and advisory firm’s recently published blueprint, Develop Your Web Experience Management Strategy, provides a structured five-phase methodology to assess current-state capabilities, define priority audiences and journeys, and build a practical roadmap for evolving the web ecosystem in alignment with organizational objectives.

“Web experience management has moved beyond basic websites to become a core driver of growth and engagement,” says Hriday Gulrajani, senior research analyst at Info-Tech Research Group. “CIOs and IT leaders need to align marketing, data, and technology teams under clear governance and a structured roadmap to deliver consistent, scalable digital experiences.”

Info-Tech’s blueprint shows that many organizations treat web modernization as a technology upgrade rather than a coordinated experience strategy. As a result, content operations remain decentralized, integration between core systems such as CMS, CRM, and analytics platforms is inconsistent, and governance responsibilities are not clearly defined. While capabilities such as personalization, automation, and advanced analytics offer opportunities to improve engagement and operational efficiency, organizations often lack a structured framework for prioritizing initiatives and measuring progress across the web ecosystem.

Key Challenges IT Leaders Face in Web Experience Management
Despite ongoing investment in digital platforms and experience initiatives, many organizations encounter structural and operational barriers that limit progress. Info-Tech’s research highlights several persistent challenges:

Content decisions are often made in silos, resulting in inconsistent messaging, fragmented governance, and unclear ownership across teams.Limited integration between CMS, CRM, analytics, and other core systems restricts visibility into user behavior and makes it difficult to measure and improve web experience performance.Legacy platforms and constrained architectures limit personalization, automation, accessibility, and multichannel delivery capabilities.Misalignment between marketing, IT, and data teams slows decision-making and weakens the organization’s ability to evolve its web ecosystem strategically.

Info-Tech’s Practical Framework for Web Experience Management
To address these challenges, Info-Tech recommends a structured five-phase approach that connects organizational strategy, customer experience priorities, and web execution. The Develop Your Web Experience Management Strategy blueprint outlines the following priorities for CIOs and IT leaders:

Phase 1: Define Vision & Success Criteria – Align WEM objectives to organizational strategy, define strategic outcomes, and establish experience KPIs to measure performance across digital touchpoints.

Phase 2: Assess Current State & Readiness – Use a web experience maturity model to evaluate capabilities across people, process, technology, and performance, and identify integration gaps and readiness risks.

Phase 3: Understand Audiences & Experience Priorities – Define priority personas, map end-to-end journeys, and translate organizational goals into structured web experience use cases prioritized by value and feasibility.

Phase 4: Architect & Govern the Ecosystem – Establish architecture principles, design the target-state WEM ecosystem, and define governance structures and operating models that clarify roles, ownership, and decision rights.

Phase 5: Launch, Communicate, & Measure – Develop a phased roadmap aligned to key value drivers, implement performance measurement frameworks, and enable continuous optimization across the web ecosystem.

Info-Tech’s Develop Your Web Experience Management Strategy blueprint is supported by a Web Experience Management Business Case Template and a Web Experience Initiatives Prioritization and Roadmap Planning Tool. These resources are designed to help CIOs and IT leaders build a clear case for modernization, prioritize initiatives based on value and feasibility, and develop phased roadmaps aligned to organizational objectives. By applying this framework and its supporting tools, organizations can strengthen governance, improve cross-functional alignment, and evolve their web ecosystem in a measurable and scalable way.

For exclusive and timely commentary from Info-Tech’s experts, including Hriday Gulrajani, and access to the complete Develop Your Web Experience Management Strategy blueprint, please contact pr@infotech.com.

About Info-Tech Research Group
Info-Tech Research Group is one of the world’s leading and fastest-growing research and advisory firms, serving over 30,000 IT, HR, and marketing professionals around the globe. As a trusted product and service leader, the company delivers unbiased, highly relevant research and industry-leading advisory support to help leaders make strategic, timely, and well-informed decisions. For nearly 30 years, Info-Tech has partnered closely with teams to provide everything they need, from actionable tools to expert guidance, ensuring they deliver measurable results for their organizations. 

To learn more about Info-Tech’s HR research and advisory services, visit McLean & Company, and for data-driven software buying insights and vendor evaluations, visit the firm’s SoftwareReviews platform. 

Media professionals can register for unrestricted access to research across IT, HR, and software, as well as hundreds of industry analysts through the firm’s Media Insiders program. To gain access, contact pr@infotech.com

For information about Info-Tech Research Group or to access the latest research, visit infotech.com and connect via LinkedIn and X

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fragmented-web-strategies-leave-organizations-exposed-as-digital-expectations-rise-warns-info-tech-research-group-302834308.html

SOURCE Info-Tech Research Group

Continue Reading

Technology

In HelloNation, Custom Fabrication Expert Mark Coyle Explains What to Know Before Choosing an Aluminum Fabrication Partner

Published

on

By

The article explains how an integrated fabrication process supports better quality, efficiency, and long-term project success.

ROCHESTER, N.Y., July 24, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — What should someone look for before selecting an aluminum fabrication partner who can guide a project from the first design sketch through final delivery? That question is answered in a HelloNation article featuring insights from Custom Fabrication Expert  Mark Coyle of American Custom Metals, Inc. in Rochester, New York, that explains how the full aluminum production workflow shapes accuracy, consistency, and long-term reliability. The article shows why a clear understanding of each stage in the process helps people make informed decisions before committing to a fabrication partner.

The article begins by explaining that aluminum fabrication involves far more than cutting or welding. It describes how every project moves through a connected chain of design support, extrusion, machining, finishing, and logistics. Each step affects the next, and the article notes that the best results come from choosing an aluminum fabrication partner who keeps these stages aligned. By showing how coordination prevents errors, the article gives readers a practical way to evaluate a potential shop.

Early design support is a major focus of the article. It states that many projects benefit when design engineering is handled in-house because small adjustments to a profile can influence strength, weight, and final performance. The HelloNation article explains that an aluminum fabrication partner with internal design capabilities can review shapes before tooling begins, reducing the risk of delays caused by unrealistic or difficult-to-extrude features. This design stage sets the direction for everything that follows, making it one of the most valuable parts of the process.

The article also examines extrusion, which it calls one of the most specialized stages in aluminum manufacturing. It notes that some shops do not extrude their own material, which forces them to rely on outside mills. That structure can lead to longer schedules and more points of communication. By contrast, an aluminum fabrication partner with direct access to extrusion equipment can control die design, schedule production runs, and manage metal flow more precisely. The article explains that this control reduces variation between batches, which supports stable timelines and more predictable quality.

Machining receives detailed attention as well. The article states that accuracy depends on how well each machine is calibrated for the specific alloy and geometry involved. It describes how a fabricator who machines their own extrusions becomes familiar with how those profiles respond to different tool paths and cutting forces. This familiarity supports tighter tolerances and more dependable results. The article explains that when machining is outsourced, the receiving shop may not know the conditions under which the material was extruded or aged, which can cause small adjustments that affect uniformity across long runs.

Finishing is another important stage explored in the article. It explains how anodizing, powder coating, polishing, or protective layers interact with thickness and alloy. The article notes that when finishing is spread across multiple vendors, the project moves more often, which increases the chance for delays or inconsistency. An aluminum fabrication partner with integrated finishing services can keep color and coating texture more uniform while maintaining a tighter schedule.

Logistics also plays a key role in the article’s guidance. It highlights that aluminum profiles, especially long or delicate ones, require thoughtful packaging, palletizing, and freight planning. A shop with its own logistics team can reduce damage risks and speed up the time between manufacturing and delivery. The article explains that when logistics is outsourced, communication slows down and the chances of errors increase, making it harder to keep a project on schedule.

Tolerance control is another subject the article describes. It explains that aluminum reacts to heat, pressure, and machining forces in predictable ways only when the team understands how the material was formed at every stage. The article notes that when extrusion, aging, machining, and inspection all occur within one operation, teams can maintain a closed loop of information. This reduces the risk of dimensional issues and strengthens consistency from batch to batch.

As the article moves toward its conclusion, it emphasizes that choosing the right aluminum fabrication partner comes down to understanding how many stages the shop directly manages. When a partner controls design, extrusion, machining, finishing, and logistics, communication becomes clearer, and the workflow becomes more predictable. The article explains that this unified structure allows teams to adjust quickly because they understand every step of the operation.

The article ends by stating that dependable performance in aluminum work depends on how well each stage connects to the next. A strong aluminum fabrication partner is defined not by one capability but by how the entire process fits together. This guidance gives readers a practical way to evaluate potential partners and make decisions that support long-term project success.

What to Know Before Choosing an Aluminum Fabrication Partner features insights from Mark Coyle, Custom Fabrication Expert of Rochester, NY, in HelloNation.

About HelloNation
HelloNation is America’s Good News Network, a premier media platform built on the idea that good news travels faster when real people tell real stories. Through its community-focused publications and innovative “edvertising” approach, HelloNation delivers content that informs, inspires, and spotlights the leaders making a meaningful impact in their communities.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/in-hellonation-custom-fabrication-expert-mark-coyle-explains-what-to-know-before-choosing-an-aluminum-fabrication-partner-302834344.html

SOURCE HelloNation

Continue Reading

Trending