Technology
LENDINGTREE REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER 2024 RESULTS
Published
2 years agoon
By
Above Forecast Results Driven by Revenue Growth Across All Three Business Segments
Consolidated revenue of $261.5 millionGAAP net income of $7.5 million or $0.55 per diluted shareVariable marketing margin of $86.7 millionAdjusted EBITDA of $32.2 millionAdjusted net income per share of $1.16
CHARLOTTE, N.C., March 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE), operator of LendingTree.com, the nation’s leading online financial services marketplace, today announced results for the quarter ended December 31, 2024. The Company has posted a shareholder letter on its investor relations website at investors.lendingtree.com.
“We are thrilled to report the company’s fourth quarter performance was well above the high end of our guidance range, showcasing the strength of our diversification,” said Doug Lebda, Chairman and CEO. “Our Insurance business delivered another outstanding quarter with revenue growth of 188% compared to the prior year period. Looking forward, we expect another solid year of AEBITDA growth in 2025 on continued revenue strength and operating expense discipline.”
Scott Peyree, President and COO, commented, “Our business has returned to broad-based growth. The exceptional Q4 performance in Insurance was powered by record revenue along with a four-percentage point sequential increase in segment margin. Our Home and Consumer segments grew revenue 35% and 12% YoY, respectively, in the quarter as well. We forecast continued revenue growth across all three of our segments in 2025. The team’s focus on operational excellence has generated multiple small wins that combine to create a stronger growth profile for the company. We are energized for the year ahead.”
Jason Bengel, CFO, added, “Our financial profile improved materially in 2024 with net leverage ending the year at 3.5x, a decline from 5.3x at year-end 2023. Our forecast anticipates further improvement in our leverage profile this year, which we intend to utilize to lower our cost of capital and improve free cashflow conversion for shareholders. We have also made steady progress managing the fixed costs of the business. Expense discipline is a core focus for the company. We anticipate the forecasted level of operating expense can drive scalable revenue growth going forward.”
Fourth Quarter 2024 Business Highlights
Home segment revenue of $34.0 million increased 35% over fourth quarter 2023 and produced segment profit of $11.7 million, a 44% increase over the same period.Consumer segment revenue of $55.6 million increased 12% over fourth quarter 2023.Within Consumer, personal loans revenue of $26.5 million increased 21% over prior year while Small Business revenue increased 45% in the period.Insurance segment revenue of $171.7 million increased 188% from fourth quarter 2023 and translated into segment profit of $48.0 million, an increase of 90% over the same period.
LendingTree Summary Financial Metrics
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
December 31,
Y/Y
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Q/Q
2024
2023
% Change
2024
% Change
Total revenue
$ 261.5
$ 134.4
95 %
$ 260.8
— %
Income (loss) before income taxes
$ 9.1
$ 13.1
(31) %
(57.5)
116 %
Income tax expense
(1.6)
(0.4)
300 %
(0.5)
220 %
Net income (loss)
$ 7.5
$ 12.7
(41) %
$ (58.0)
113 %
Net income (loss) % of revenue
3 %
9 %
(22) %
Income (loss) per share
Basic
$ 0.56
$ 0.98
$ (4.34)
Diluted
$ 0.55
$ 0.98
$ (4.34)
Variable marketing margin
Total revenue
$ 261.5
$ 134.4
95 %
$ 260.8
— %
Variable marketing expense (1) (2)
$ (174.8)
$ (73.8)
137 %
$ (183.6)
(5) %
Variable marketing margin (2)
$ 86.7
$ 60.6
43 %
$ 77.2
12 %
Variable marketing margin % of revenue (2)
33 %
45 %
30 %
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
$ 32.2
$ 15.5
108 %
$ 26.9
20 %
Adjusted EBITDA % of revenue (2)
12 %
12 %
10 %
Adjusted net income (2)
$ 15.8
$ 3.6
339 %
$ 10.9
45 %
Adjusted net income per share (2)
$ 1.16
$ 0.28
314 %
$ 0.80
45 %
(1)
Represents the portion of selling and marketing expense attributable to variable costs paid for advertising, direct marketing and related expenses. Excludes overhead, fixed costs and personnel-related expenses.
(2)
Variable marketing expense, variable marketing margin, variable marketing margin % of revenue, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA % of revenue, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share are non-GAAP measures. Please see “LendingTree’s Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP” and “LendingTree’s Principles of Financial Reporting” below for more information.
LendingTree Segment Results
(In millions)
Three Months Ended
December 31,
Y/Y
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Q/Q
2024
2023
% Change
2024
% Change
Home (1)
Revenue
$ 34.0
$ 25.1
35 %
$ 32.2
6 %
Segment profit
$ 11.7
$ 8.1
44 %
$ 9.3
26 %
Segment profit % of revenue
34 %
32 %
29 %
Consumer (2)
Revenue
$ 55.6
$ 49.5
12 %
$ 59.5
(7) %
Segment profit
$ 28.2
$ 28.9
(2) %
$ 28.0
1 %
Segment profit % of revenue
51 %
58 %
47 %
Insurance (3)
Revenue
$ 171.7
$ 59.6
188 %
$ 169.1
2 %
Segment profit
$ 48.0
$ 25.2
90 %
$ 41.4
16 %
Segment profit % of revenue
28 %
42 %
24 %
Other (4)
Revenue
$ 0.2
$ 0.1
100 %
$ —
— %
(Loss) profit
$ —
$ (0.1)
(100) %
$ —
— %
Total revenue
$ 261.5
$ 134.4
95 %
$ 260.8
— %
Total segment profit
$ 87.9
$ 62.2
41 %
$ 78.6
12 %
Brand marketing expense (5)
$ (1.2)
$ (1.6)
(25) %
$ (1.4)
(14) %
Variable marketing margin
$ 86.7
$ 60.6
43 %
$ 77.2
12 %
Variable marketing margin % of revenue
33 %
45 %
30 %
(1)
The Home segment includes the following products: purchase mortgage, refinance mortgage, and home equity loans.
(2)
The Consumer segment includes the following products: credit cards, personal loans, small business loans, student loans, auto loans, deposit accounts, and debt settlement.
(3)
The Insurance segment consists of insurance quote products and sales of insurance policies.
(4)
The Other category includes marketing revenue and related expenses not allocated to a specific segment.
(5)
Brand marketing expense represents the portion of selling and marketing expense attributable to variable costs paid for advertising, direct marketing and related expenses that are not assignable to the segments’ products. This measure excludes overhead, fixed costs and personnel-related expenses.
Financial Outlook
Today we are issuing our outlook for the first-quarter and full-year 2025.
For first-quarter 2025:
Revenue: $241 – $248 millionVariable Marketing Margin: $75 – $79 millionAdjusted EBITDA: $25 – $27 million
For full-year 2025:
Revenue is anticipated to be in the range of $985 – $1,025 million, an increase of 9% to 14% compared to 2024.Variable Marketing Margin is expected to be in the range of $319 – $336 million, representing growth of 5% to 10% over last year.Adjusted EBITDA is anticipated to be in the range of $116 – $126 million, an increase of 11% to 21% from 2024.
Our full-year 2025 outlook assumes double-digit revenue growth in both the Home and Consumer segments, with more modest Insurance segment growth following a record year.
LendingTree is not able to provide a reconciliation of projected variable marketing margin or adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable expected GAAP results due to the unknown effect, timing and potential significance of the effects of legal matters and tax considerations. Expenses associated with legal matters and tax consequences have in the past, and may in the future, significantly affect GAAP results in a particular period.
Quarterly Conference Call
A conference call to discuss LendingTree’s fourth-quarter 2024 financial results will be webcast live today, March 5, 2025 at 5:00 PM Eastern Time (ET). The live webcast is open to the public and will be available on LendingTree’s investor relations website at investors.lendingtree.com. Following completion of the call, a recorded replay of the webcast will be available on LendingTree’s investor relations website.
LENDINGTREE’S RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP
Variable Marketing Expense
Below is a reconciliation of selling and marketing expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to variable marketing expense. See “Lending Tree’s Principles of Financial Reporting” for further discussion of the Company’s use of this non-GAAP measure.
Three Months Ended
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2024
September 30,
2024
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
(in thousands)
Selling and marketing expense
$ 185,858
$ 193,542
$ 83,168
$ 635,963
$ 433,588
Non-variable selling and marketing expense (1)
(11,084)
(9,976)
(9,407)
(40,055)
(42,031)
Variable marketing expense
$ 174,774
$ 183,566
$ 73,761
$ 595,908
$ 391,557
(1)
Represents the portion of selling and marketing expense not attributable to variable costs paid for advertising, direct marketing and related expenses. Includes overhead, fixed costs and personnel-related expenses.
LENDINGTREE’S RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP
Variable Marketing Margin
Below is a reconciliation of net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to variable marketing margin and net income (loss) % of revenue to variable marketing margin % of revenue. See “LendingTree’s Principles of Financial Reporting” for further discussion of the Company’s use of these non-GAAP measures.
Three Months Ended
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2024
September 30,
2024
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
(in thousands, except percentages)
Net income (loss)
$ 7,506
$ (57,978)
$ 12,719
$ (41,704)
$ (122,404)
Net income (loss) % of revenue
3 %
(22) %
9 %
(5) %
(18) %
Adjustments to reconcile to variable marketing margin:
Cost of revenue
9,744
9,372
8,126
36,072
38,758
Non-variable selling and marketing expense (1)
11,084
9,976
9,407
40,055
42,031
General and administrative expense
29,111
26,680
25,477
108,705
117,700
Product development
12,937
11,190
11,101
46,358
47,197
Depreciation
4,448
4,584
4,831
18,300
19,070
Amortization of intangibles
1,467
1,466
1,682
5,889
7,694
Goodwill impairment
—
—
—
—
38,600
Restructuring and severance
10
273
151
508
10,118
Litigation settlements and contingencies
6
3,762
38
3,797
388
Interest expense (income), net
9,950
10,060
(10,693)
27,849
(21,685)
Other (income) expense
(1,143)
57,391
(2,644)
54,162
105,993
Income tax expense (benefit)
1,628
447
397
4,320
(2,515)
Variable marketing margin
$ 86,748
$ 77,223
$ 60,592
$ 304,311
$ 280,945
Variable marketing margin % of revenue
33 %
30 %
45 %
34 %
42 %
(1)
Represents the portion of selling and marketing expense not attributable to variable costs paid for advertising, direct marketing and related expenses. Includes overhead, fixed costs and personnel-related expenses.
LENDINGTREE’S RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP
Adjusted EBITDA
Below is a reconciliation of net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to adjusted EBITDA and net income (loss) % of revenue to adjusted EBITDA % of revenue. See “LendingTree’s Principles of Financial Reporting” for further discussion of the Company’s use of these non-GAAP measures.
Three Months Ended
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2024
September 30,
2024
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
(in thousands, except percentages)
Net income (loss)
$ 7,506
$ (57,978)
$ 12,719
$ (41,704)
$ (122,404)
Net income (loss) % of revenue
3 %
(22) %
9 %
(5) %
(18) %
Adjustments to reconcile to adjusted EBITDA:
Amortization of intangibles
1,467
1,466
1,682
5,889
7,694
Depreciation
4,448
4,584
4,831
18,300
19,070
Restructuring and severance
10
273
151
508
10,118
Loss on impairments and disposal of assets
1,797
6
182
2,584
5,437
Loss on impairment of investments
—
58,376
—
58,376
114,504
Goodwill impairment
—
—
—
—
38,600
Non-cash compensation
6,494
6,859
8,177
28,579
37,176
Acquisition expense
—
—
—
—
(5)
Litigation settlements and contingencies
6
3,762
38
3,797
388
Interest expense (income), net
9,950
10,060
(10,693)
27,849
(21,685)
Dividend income
(1,144)
(982)
(2,021)
(4,385)
(7,888)
Income tax expense (benefit)
1,628
447
397
4,320
(2,515)
Adjusted EBITDA
$ 32,162
$ 26,873
$ 15,463
$ 104,113
$ 78,490
Adjusted EBITDA % of revenue
12 %
10 %
12 %
12 %
12 %
LENDINGTREE’S RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAP
Adjusted Net Income
Below is a reconciliation of net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to adjusted net income and net income (loss) per diluted share to adjusted net income per share. See “LendingTree’s Principles of Financial Reporting” for further discussion of the Company’s use of these non-GAAP measures.
Three Months Ended
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2024
September 30,
2024
December 31,
2023
December 31,
2024
December 31,
2023
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss)
$ 7,506
$ (57,978)
$ 12,719
$ (41,704)
$ (122,404)
Adjustments to reconcile to adjusted net income:
Restructuring and severance
10
273
151
508
10,118
Goodwill impairment
—
—
—
—
38,600
Loss on impairments and disposal of assets
1,797
6
182
2,584
5,437
Loss on impairment of investments
—
58,376
—
58,376
114,504
Non-cash compensation
6,494
6,859
8,177
28,579
37,176
Acquisition expense
—
—
—
—
(5)
Litigation settlements and contingencies
6
3,762
38
3,797
388
Gain on extinguishment of debt
—
(416)
(17,665)
(9,035)
(48,562)
Income tax benefit from adjusted items
—
—
—
—
(5,764)
Adjusted net income
$ 15,813
$ 10,882
$ 3,602
$ 43,105
$ 29,488
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax
—
—
—
1,871
—
Adjusted net income attributable to shareholders
$ 15,813
$ 10,882
$ 3,602
$ 44,976
$ 29,488
Net income (loss) per diluted share
$ 0.55
$ (4.34)
$ 0.98
$ (3.14)
$ (9.46)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to adjusted net income
0.61
5.16
(0.70)
6.39
11.74
Adjustments to reconcile effect of dilutive securities
—
(0.02)
—
(0.06)
—
Adjusted net income per share
$ 1.16
$ 0.80
$ 0.28
$ 3.19
$ 2.28
Adjusted weighted average diluted shares outstanding
13,591
13,555
13,020
14,121
12,957
Effect of dilutive securities
—
206
—
235
16
Effect of dilutive convertible notes
—
—
—
617
—
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
13,591
13,349
13,020
13,269
12,941
Effect of dilutive securities
224
—
12
—
—
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
13,367
13,349
13,008
13,269
12,941
LENDINGTREE’S PRINCIPLES OF FINANCIAL REPORTING
LendingTree reports the following non-GAAP measures as supplemental to GAAP:
Variable marketing expenseVariable marketing marginVariable marketing margin % of revenueEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, as adjusted for certain items discussed below (“Adjusted EBITDA”)Adjusted EBITDA % of revenueAdjusted net incomeAdjusted net income per share
Variable marketing expense, variable marketing margin and variable marketing margin % of revenue are related measures of the effectiveness of the Company’s marketing efforts. Variable marketing expense represents the portion of selling and marketing expense attributable to variable costs paid for advertising, direct marketing, and related expenses, and excludes overhead, fixed costs, and personnel-related expenses. Variable marketing margin is a measure of the efficiency of the Company’s operating model, measuring revenue after subtracting variable marketing expense. The Company’s operating model is highly sensitive to the amount and efficiency of variable marketing expenditures, and the Company’s proprietary systems are able to make rapidly changing decisions concerning the deployment of variable marketing expenditures (primarily but not exclusively online and mobile advertising placement) based on proprietary and sophisticated analytics.
Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA % of revenue are primary metrics by which LendingTree evaluates the operating performance of its businesses, on which its marketing expenditures and internal budgets are based and, in the case of adjusted EBITDA, by which management and many employees are compensated in most years.
Adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share supplement GAAP net income and GAAP net income per diluted share by enabling investors to make period to period comparisons of those components of the most directly comparable GAAP measures that management believes better reflect the underlying financial performance of the Company’s business operations during particular financial reporting periods. Adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share exclude certain amounts, such as non-cash compensation, non-cash asset impairment charges, gain/loss on disposal of assets, gain/loss on investments, restructuring and severance, litigation settlements and contingencies, acquisition and disposition income or expenses including with respect to changes in fair value of contingent consideration, gain/loss on extinguishment of debt, contributions to the LendingTree Foundation, one-time items which are recognized and recorded under GAAP in particular periods but which might be viewed as not necessarily coinciding with the underlying business operations for the periods in which they are so recognized and recorded, the effects to income taxes of the aforementioned adjustments, any excess tax benefit or expense associated with stock-based compensation recorded in net income in conjunction with FASB pronouncement ASU 2016-09, and income tax (benefit) expense from a full valuation allowance. LendingTree believes that adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share are useful financial indicators that provide a different view of the financial performance of the Company than adjusted EBITDA (the primary metric by which LendingTree evaluates the operating performance of its businesses) and the GAAP measures of net income and GAAP net income per diluted share.
These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. LendingTree provides and encourages investors to examine the reconciling adjustments between the GAAP and non-GAAP measures set forth above.
Definition of LendingTree’s Non-GAAP Measures
Variable marketing margin is defined as revenue less variable marketing expense. Variable marketing expense is defined as the expense attributable to variable costs paid for advertising, direct marketing and related expenses, and excluding overhead, fixed costs and personnel-related expenses. The majority of these variable advertising costs are expressly intended to drive traffic to our websites and these variable advertising costs are included in selling and marketing expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and consolidated income.
EBITDA is defined as net income excluding interest, income taxes, amortization of intangibles and depreciation.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) gain/loss on investments, (5) restructuring and severance expenses, (6) litigation settlements and contingencies, (7) acquisitions and dispositions income or expense (including with respect to changes in fair value of contingent consideration), (8) contributions to the LendingTree Foundation,(9) dividend income, and (10) one-time items.
Adjusted net income is defined as net income (loss) excluding (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) gain/loss on investments, (5) restructuring and severance expenses, (6) litigation settlements and contingencies, (7) acquisitions and dispositions income or expense (including with respect to changes in fair value of contingent consideration), (8) gain/loss on extinguishment of debt, (9) contributions to the LendingTree Foundation, (10) one-time items, (11) the effects to income taxes of the aforementioned adjustments, (12) any excess tax benefit or expense associated with stock-based compensation recorded in net income in conjunction with FASB pronouncement ASU 2016-09, and (13) income tax (benefit) expense from a full valuation allowance.
Adjusted net income per share is defined as adjusted net income divided by the adjusted weighted average diluted shares outstanding. For periods which the Company reports GAAP loss, the effects of potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the calculation of net loss per diluted share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. In periods where the Company reports GAAP loss but reports positive non-GAAP adjusted net income, the effects of potentially dilutive securities are included in the denominator for calculating adjusted net income per share if their inclusion would be dilutive.
LendingTree endeavors to compensate for the limitations of these non-GAAP measures by also providing the comparable GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
One-Time Items
Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income are adjusted for one-time items, if applicable. Items are considered one-time in nature if they are non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. For the periods presented in this report, there are no adjustments for one-time items.
Non-Cash Expenses That Are Excluded From LendingTree’s Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income
Non-cash compensation expense consists principally of expense associated with the grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options. These expenses are not paid in cash and LendingTree includes the related shares in its calculations of fully diluted shares outstanding. Upon settlement of restricted stock units, exercise of certain stock options or vesting of restricted stock awards, the awards may be settled on a net basis, with LendingTree remitting the required tax withholding amounts from its current funds. Cash expenditures for employer payroll taxes on non-cash compensation are included within adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income.
Amortization of intangibles are non-cash expenses relating primarily to acquisitions. At the time of an acquisition, the intangible assets of the acquired company, such as purchase agreements, technology and customer relationships, are valued and amortized over their estimated lives. Amortization of intangibles are only excluded from adjusted EBITDA.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
The matters contained in the discussion above may be considered to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations or anticipations of LendingTree and members of our management team. Factors currently known to management that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include the following: adverse conditions in the primary and secondary mortgage markets and in the economy, particularly interest rates and inflation; default rates on loans, particularly unsecured loans; demand by investors for unsecured personal loans; the effect of such demand on interest rates for personal loans and consumer demand for personal loans; seasonality of results; potential liabilities to secondary market purchasers; changes in the Company’s relationships with network partners, including dependence on certain key network partners; breaches of network security or the misappropriation or misuse of personal consumer information; failure to provide competitive service; failure to maintain brand recognition; ability to attract and retain consumers in a cost-effective manner; the effects of potential acquisitions of other businesses, including the ability to integrate them successfully with LendingTree’s existing operations; accounting rules related to excess tax benefits or expenses on stock-based compensation that could materially affect earnings in future periods; ability to develop new products and services and enhance existing ones; competition; effects of changing laws, rules or regulations on our business model; allegations of failure to comply with existing or changing laws, rules or regulations, or to obtain and maintain required licenses; failure of network partners or other affiliated parties to comply with regulatory requirements; failure to maintain the integrity of systems and infrastructure; liabilities as a result of privacy regulations; failure to adequately protect intellectual property rights or allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights; and changes in management. These and additional factors to be considered are set forth under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2023, in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2024, and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. LendingTree undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results or expectations.
About LendingTree, Inc.
LendingTree, Inc. is the parent of LendingTree, LLC and several companies owned by LendingTree, LLC (collectively, “LendingTree” or the “Company”).
LendingTree is one of the nation’s largest, most experienced online financial platforms, created to give consumers the power to win financially. LendingTree provides customers with access to the best offers on loans, credit cards, insurance and more through its network of approximately 430 financial partners. Since its founding, LendingTree has helped millions of customers obtain financing, save money, and improve their financial and credit health in their personal journeys. With a portfolio of innovative products and tools and personalized financial recommendations, LendingTree helps customers achieve everyday financial wins.
LendingTree, Inc. is headquartered in Charlotte, NC. For more information, please visit www.lendingtree.com.
Investor Relations:
investors@lendingtree.com
Media Relations:
press@lendingtree.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lendingtree-reports-fourth-quarter-2024-results-302393706.html
SOURCE LendingTree, Inc.
You may like
Technology
Haloid Poll: Majority of Public Safety and Commercial Radio Administrators Would Consider Starlink Integration With LMR Two-Way Radio Networks, but Disruption Unlikely
Published
48 minutes agoon
October 26, 2026By
STONY BROOK, N.Y., Oct. 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Following Starlink’s announced entry into the mobile communications space, Haloid’s consulting team polled government and business land mobile radio (LMR) administrators on whether Starlink could replace, or complement, their LMR systems. We found that most radio administrators were receptive to the nascent technology but did not see it as a replacement for their LMR networks.
Sixty-seven percent of radio administrators said they would be willing to integrate Starlink technology if it allowed them to expand coverage or lower infrastructure costs. When asked whether Starlink could completely replace their LMR networks, fewer than 15 percent said yes; the vast majority believed Starlink is not as reliable as the custom networks they have built. Among administrators who already use two-way radio over cellular (also known as push-to-talk over cellular, or PoC), however, nearly 80 percent said that Starlink’s satellite coverage, combined with its newly acquired cellular spectrum, would make it more desirable than the industry’s wireless incumbents because it could eliminate dead spots where cellular does not reach.
In the U.S., hundreds of thousands of radio users rely on traditional cellular carriers for push-to-talk communications, and that number grows each year. While the migration to two-way radio over cellular has affected the LMR industry, it has not replaced it. Many public safety agencies never made the switch, citing the risk that cellular networks could go down during weather events, power outages, or cyberattacks and jeopardize emergency communications.
In fact, during recent cellular outages, Starlink was used to provide emergency communications to affected areas, because its satellite connectivity does not depend on cell towers. But Starlink’s integration with the 800 MHz cellular spectrum — “Starlink 2.0,” as some experts are calling it — exposes it to some of the same vulnerabilities as traditional wireless carriers.
While Starlink’s satellite service might still function if local cell towers go down, a critical portion of an agency’s communications might rely on local towers using the 800 MHz spectrum, leaving the agency vulnerable in a storm or outage.
Expect evolution, not disruption
“Just like cellular didn’t replace LMR, we don’t see Starlink as an existential risk,” said Jeremy Alicandri, President of Haloid Solutions. He expects Starlink to accelerate the industry’s evolution toward shared communications infrastructure, also known as hybrid LMR. “We have public safety customers already using Starlink in their vehicles to extend the coverage of their radios. This trend will continue as Starlink devices become more ubiquitous.”
The stock prices of Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T were affected by Starlink’s recent announcement. LMR stocks such as L3Harris, JVCKENWOOD, and BK Technologies, maker of the Bendix King brand, have been unaffected, as Wall Street views Starlink as unlikely to replace LMR technology for the same reasons cellular did not. “But it may be too early to predict the industry’s winners and losers,” Alicandri added. “The cellular incumbents have many advantages, including low-cost devices, existing infrastructure, and their own satellite ambitions.”
About Haloid Solutions Research
Haloid’s Starlink poll drew on respondents to its LMR brand loyalty study, which measures radio administrators’ sentiment toward the ownership and after-sales experience. Haloid’s LMR research is sponsored by investors in the mission-critical communications space.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/haloid-poll-majority-of-public-safety-and-commercial-radio-administrators-would-consider-starlink-integration-with-lmr-two-way-radio-networks-but-disruption-unlikely-302918986.html
SOURCE HALOID SOLUTIONS
Technology
Newborn Town and Viggle Launch AI-Powered 3D Interactive Game, Bringing World Models to Social Gaming
Published
48 minutes agoon
October 26, 2026By
HONG KONG, Oct. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Recently, Newborn Town’s game-oriented social platform TopTop has launched “Slap Showdown”, an AI-powered 3D interactive mini-game developed in collaboration with Viggle, a company specializing in physics-native world models. The launch brings world model technology into social gaming, offering users a more personalized and engaging interactive experience.
Developed by TopTop and powered by Viggle’s self-developed Joint Space-Time (JST) world model, “Slap Showdown” lets users turn uploaded photos into customized 3D characters and take them straight into the game.
Launched in September, “Slap Showdown” has gained particular traction in Japan, among Spanish-speaking users in North America, and across the Middle East. It is now available in multiple countries and regions worldwide.
From Better Gameplay to a Richer Ecosystem: How World Models Could Redefine Social Gaming on TopTop
In terms of gameplay, “Slap Showdown” combines AI-generated 3D characters with multiplayer interaction. Players can simply upload a photo from their phone and generate a personalized 3D character in around 30 seconds, whether it’s an anime protagonist, a cyberpunk cyborg, or a LEGO minifigure. They can then bring their custom characters into the game and face off against other players in fun, interactive battles.
As players use controls such as press-and-hold, tap, and drag, the 3D characters respond with realistic, physics-based movements. This takes AI-generated characters beyond visual customization, integrating them directly into the gameplay experience.
According to TopTop’s operations team, “Slap Showdown” has attracted a growing base of highly engaged, high-spending-potential players in its first month since launch. The game has recorded a 97% match completion rate, while its game-start rate has also exceeded the platform-wide average.
The depth of user engagement is further illustrated by individual player activity. One player in Japan completed 1,041 matches over 22 days, reaching a daily peak of 151 matches and averaging one match every 9.5 minutes. Another particularly avid player in Eastern Europe completed 735 matches in just 11 days, averaging 66.8 matches per day and peaking at 126 matches in a single day.
For a UGC-driven social gaming platform such as TopTop, mini-games serve as entry points and traffic drivers, while social features underpin retention and monetization. Personalized 3D avatars add another dimension to that experience. Beyond their visual appeal, they give users new ways to express themselves, interact with friends and share memorable moments. In turn, richer gameplay and more meaningful social interactions can help improve retention, attract new users and strengthen engagement across the platform.
“Slap Showdown” marks a successful step in TopTop’s efforts to deepen its application of AI technology, as well as a starting point for using world models to enhance gaming and social experiences. TopTop’s operations team said future game releases could make greater use of AI-powered 3D generation, extending beyond avatars to include customized environments. Existing games could also be revitalized by the introduction of new gameplay features, potentially driving stronger retention and user acquisition.
Beyond enriching gameplay, world model capabilities could also reshape social interaction itself, enabling more immersive, face-to-face experiences in virtual spaces. “We’re constantly exploring how AI can transform gaming and social interaction, while bringing new energy and capabilities to our UGC ecosystem,” TopTop’s operations team said.
Viggle Unveils Physics-Native Model JST-2, Setting Its Sights on Becoming the Infrastructure Layer for Physical AI
The world model technology powering “Slap Showdown” is provided by Viggle.
Founded in 2022, Viggle has focused on developing physics-native world foundation models. Its self-developed JST model can generate 3D characters, motion and environments directly, providing a foundation for gaming and a growing range of AI applications.
Viggle previously attracted widespread attention with Meme Maker, its AI-powered video creation product. The tool enables users to animate static characters and generate videos by applying specified movements, making AI character animation and video creation more accessible. In August 2024, Viggle raised USD 19 million in a Series A funding round led by Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z).
However, video creation was an early application of this technology. Viggle’s longer-term ambition is to make JST a foundational technology for AI-powered experiences across gaming, social platforms and other applications.
Viggle is now further expanding its technological boundaries. On 19 October, Viggle launched JST-2 in full, likening its significance for world models to GPT-2’s role in the evolution of language models.
Unlike many world models that infer physical structure indirectly from pixels, JST-2 is built around a physics-native architecture designed to learn the structure and dynamics of the 3D world directly. Its underlying representation consists of units resembling digital “atoms.” Each has a defined position in three-dimensional space, along with physical properties such as material, color and mass, and information describing how it moves and responds to forces. This allows the model to do more than generate convincing images. It can represent and generate 3D characters, motion and scenes with an underlying understanding of their physical properties.
To support this approach, Viggle has developed an integrated technology stack spanning tokenization, model architecture, data engine, pre-training and post-training. After four years of research and development, JST-2 can generate characters, motion and scenes within a single unified architecture.
Compared with other approaches, JST-2 also demonstrates cost efficiency. JST-2 can generate a 3D scene in seconds, at an inference cost of less than one US cent. Once created, the content can be rendered locally without repeatedly running the foundation model to generate each frame.
It is noteworthy that world model technology remains at an early stage, but Viggle is already working toward more advanced capabilities.
Its next-generation model, JST-3, is intended to become a comprehensive world simulator. Such a system could underpin future game and graphics engines, while also serving as a virtual training environment for robotics and other forms of physical AI.
The longer-term goal is for JST-3 to learn the physical rules governing its simulated world directly from data, rather than relying on rules explicitly written by developers.
For Newborn Town, its investment in and partnership with Viggle represents an important step in exploring how advanced AI can reshape social gaming, promoting a deep integration of AI technology with its business operations.
As a leading global social entertainment company, Newborn Town has continued to deepen the use of AI across key areas in recent years, including product R&D, social recommendation systems, intelligent operations, safety and risk management, and marketing and user acquisition, supporting ongoing business growth.
Meanwhile, the company also continued to invest across the AI ecosystem, backing projects in areas including world models, AI companionship, AI Agents and AI interactive gaming. These investments have further enriched its AI application ecosystem, with Viggle among the AI companies previously backed by Newborn Town.
“Slap Showdown” represents an early step in bringing world models into social gaming. For Newborn Town and Viggle, the next challenge is to turn increasingly sophisticated AI capabilities into experiences that users find genuinely engaging — and compelling enough to keep coming back.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/newborn-town-and-viggle-launch-ai-powered-3d-interactive-game-bringing-world-models-to-social-gaming-302918961.html
SOURCE Newborn Town
Technology
HKICEC Launches First-Ever Global Mobile Exchange Pavilion at Mobile Electronics Show
Published
48 minutes agoon
October 26, 2026By
Charting a New Milestone with Outstanding Achievements
HONG KONG, Oct. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — The Hong Kong International Communications Electronic Chamber (HKICEC) made a landmark debut at the Global Sources Mobile Electronics Show, held from October 18-21, 2026, with the inaugural launch of the HKICEC Global Mobile Exchange Pavilion. Spanning 600 square meters, the pavilion brought together nearly 60 industry leaders from mainland China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, the UAE, the US and the UK. As the largest themed pavilion in the mobile electronics sector and a premier highlight of the exhibition, this event marks a new developmental milestone for HKICEC. The pavilion underscores the chamber’s dedication to bridging global markets and serving the communications and electronics industry, injecting vital new momentum into the synergy between Hong Kong’s technology sector and international trade.
The grand opening ceremony on October 18 marked the official launch of the first B2B pavilion in Hong Kong and Asia dedicated exclusively to mobile communications equipment. The milestone event was officiated by a distinguished lineup of devices global business, including Dr. the Hon. Starry Lee Wai King, GBS, JP, Member of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress and President of the Legislative Council; Mr. Zhu Xiaodong, Director of the Kowloon Affairs Department of the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in the HKSAR; Dr. the Hon. Horace Cheung Kwok Kwan SBS JP, Deputy Secretary for Justice, HKSAR; Mr. Liu Maozhou, Level 1 Bureau Rank Official, the Economic and Financial Department II, Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in the HKSAR; Mr. Ho Lap Ki, Denny, JP, District Officer (Kwun Tong), Home Affairs Department; Mr James Liu, CEO of Global Sources; and Mr. Jacky Tse, Chairman of HKICEC, alongside HKICEC Management team. Together, they witnessed the official launch of the first B2B pavilion in Hong Kong and Asia dedicated to mobile communications equipment. The ceremony drew over a hundred political and business leaders, industry representatives, international exhibitors, and major media outlets, reflecting the event’s importance and the industry’s green trading development. Following the inauguration, officials toured the pavilion for high-level discussions with global exhibitors, signaling robust institutional backing for the industry and HKICEC’s strategic expansion.
During the four-day exhibition, the pavilion experienced a continuous flow of visitors. Communications and electronics suppliers and global buyers from overseas visited specifically for business matchmaking and negotiations, unlocking numerous commercial opportunities. Notably, the pavilion also featured a retrospective exhibit of 16 classic mobile phones, tracing the industry’s evolution from early ‘brick’ devices to Mainland China’s first official Apple release, the iPhone 3GS. The historical display proved to be a standout attraction, gathering large crowds throughout the event.
Beyond the exhibition floor, the chamber partnered with Global Sources to co-host an international forum on October 19. Under the theme ” From New Devices to New Life: Building a Global Mobile Device Lifecycle Ecosystem”, the event gathered experts from ecoATM, PCS Wireless, Cenwood, Our Hong Kong Foundation, and the Global Mobile Association. They engaged in profound discussions on cutting-edge topics including the global economic landscape, inventory management, ESG development, the circular ecology of new and used devices, and AI technology. Attended by over 200 international representatives, the forum successfully catalyzed cross-border collaboration and established a new standard for sustainability discourse in the global mobile industry.
As a capstone to the comprehensive four-day events, HKICEC convened over 500 industry leaders, VIPs, and exhibitors for a high-profile networking banquet designed to accelerate cross-border business alliances. The gathering provided a premier platform for delegates to solidify collaborative ties and exchange strategic insights initiated from the pavilion. Ahead of the exhibition’s conclusion, a special ” Pearl Of The Orient • Victoria Harbour Cruise Party” was organized to showcase Hong Kong’s unique charm as a cosmopolitan city to global guests, providing a memorable networking experience against Hong Kong’s iconic skyline to formally cap off the week’s successes.
High-resolution images: https://bit.ly/3WqHMxu
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/hkicec-launches-first-ever-global-mobile-exchange-pavilion-at-mobile-electronics-show-302918996.html
SOURCE The Hong Kong International Communications Electronic Chamber (HKICEC)
Haloid Poll: Majority of Public Safety and Commercial Radio Administrators Would Consider Starlink Integration With LMR Two-Way Radio Networks, but Disruption Unlikely
Newborn Town and Viggle Launch AI-Powered 3D Interactive Game, Bringing World Models to Social Gaming
HKICEC Launches First-Ever Global Mobile Exchange Pavilion at Mobile Electronics Show
Send Rakhi to UK swiftly with UK Gifts Portal
Whiteboard Series with NEAR | Ep: 45 Joel Thorstensson from ceramic.network
Nullmax and Renesas Forge Strategic Partnership to Deliver Competitive ADAS Solutions for the Global Market
Why You Should Build on #NEAR – Co-founder Illia Polosukhin at CV Labs
Whiteboard Series with NEAR | Ep: 45 Joel Thorstensson from ceramic.network
NEAR End of Year Town Hall 2021: The Open Web World, MetaBUILD 2 Hackathon and 2021 recap
Trending
-
Technology3 days agoMiami Startup BOB Raises $5.5M To Build An AI-Powered Banking Platform
-
Technology4 days agoVoqalize Says Voice Is Becoming the Default Way People Use Software
-
Technology5 days agoToku launches Makimoto Flows, a visual builder for speech AI pipelines, taking its open-source initiative beyond transcription
-
Coin Market4 days agoBitcoin ETFs bag another $528M, taking 3-day haul past $1B
-
Technology4 days agoSnapmaker Introduces New Filament Bundle, Expanding Its Full Spectrum Printing Ecosystem
-
Technology4 days agoNew GASA Research: 71% of Adults Surveyed Across 13 Asian Markets Encountered Scams, with Estimated Losses of US$136.5 Billion
-
Technology4 days agoPRC-Saltillo Acquires Ner Chat, Bringing Minspeak® Symbols to Glint Visual Support Platform
-
Technology5 days agoAsymbl Opens Austin Headquarters as AI Takes On More Work
