Technology
Manufacturing PMI® at 52.7%; April 2026 ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report
Published
11 hours agoon
By
New Orders Growing; Production Growing; Employment Contracting; Supplier Deliveries Slowing; Raw Materials Inventories Contracting; Customers’ Inventories Too Low; Prices Increasing; Imports Growing; Exports Contracting
TEMPE, Ariz., May 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in April for the fourth consecutive month, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report.
The report was issued today by Susan Spence, MBA, Chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee.
“The Manufacturing PMI® registered 52.7 percent in April, the same reading as March. The overall economy continued in expansion for the 18th month in a row. (A Manufacturing PMI® above 47.5 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy.) The New Orders Index expanded for the fourth straight month after four straight readings in contraction, registering 54.1 percent, up 0.6 percentage point compared to March’s figure of 53.5 percent. The April reading of the Production Index (53.4 percent) is 1.7 percentage points lower than March’s reading of 55.1 percent. The Prices Index remained in expansion (or ‘increasing’ territory), registering 84.6 percent, a 6.3-percentage point jump from March’s reading of 78.3 percent. In the last three months, the Prices Index has increased 25.6 percentage points to reach its highest level since April 2022 (84.6 percent). The Backlog of Orders Index registered 51.4 percent, down 3 percentage points compared to the 54.4 percent recorded in March. The Employment Index registered 46.4 percent, down 2.3 percentage points from March’s figure of 48.7 percent,” says Spence.
“The Supplier Deliveries Index indicated slowing performance for the fifth month in a row after one month in ‘faster’ territory. The reading of 60.6 percent is up 1.7 percentage points from the 58.9 percent recorded in March; the index has risen in each of the last five months, meaning delivery times are increasingly slowing. (Supplier Deliveries is the only ISM® PMI® Reports index that is inversed; a reading of above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries, which is typical as the economy improves and customer demand increases.)
“The Inventories Index registered 49 percent, up 1.9 percentage points compared to March’s reading of 47.1 percent. The Customers’ Inventories Index reading of 39.1 percent is a 1-percentage point decrease compared to March.
“The New Export Orders Index reading of 47.9 percent is 2 percentage points lower than the reading of 49.9 percent registered in March, making it the second month in a row in contraction territory. The Imports Index registered 50.3 percent, 2.3 percentage points lower than March’s reading of 52.6 percent.”
Spence continues, “In April, U.S. manufacturing activity remained in expansion territory, growing at the same pace as the month before. Of the five subindexes that make up the PMI®, the New Orders and Supplier Deliveries indexes indicated faster growth compared to the previous month, the Production Index grew at a slower rate, and the Employment and Inventories indexes remained in contraction.
“In this second month of the Iran War (at the time of data collection), 31 percent of the comments were positive and 69 percent negative, with a positive to negative sentiment ratio of 1 to 2.2. Among comments, the war was mentioned in 47 percent and tariffs in 18 percent. As was the case last month, some panelists referenced both topics within a single comment or in mixed sentiment.
“Two of four demand indicators (the New Orders and Backlog of Orders indexes) remain in expansion, although the Backlog of Orders Index dropped 3 percentage points compared to March. The New Export Orders Index remained in contraction with a 2-percentage point decrease, and the Customers’ Inventories Index remains in ‘too low’ territory, contracting at a slightly faster rate. A ‘too low’ status for the Customers’ Inventories Index is usually considered positive for future production.
“Regarding output, the Production Index is in expansion for the sixth month in a row (although it lost ground compared to March), and the Employment Index decreased by 2.3 percentage points and remains in contraction. Among panelists, 60 percent indicated that managing head counts remains the norm at their companies as opposed to hiring, and of those managing head counts, 34 percent are using layoffs and 43 percent using attrition or not backfilling positions.
“Finally, inputs (defined as supplier deliveries, inventories, prices, and imports) had another month of mixed results. The Supplier Deliveries Index indicated increasingly slowing deliveries, the Inventories Index contracted at a slower rate, and the Prices Index vaulted again — up another 6.3 percentage points to 84.6 percent, from 78.3 percent in March, and the highest reading from April 2022, when it was also at 84.6 percent. The Imports Index lost 2.3 percentage points for a reading of 50.3 percent, compared to 52.6 percent in March.
“Looking at the manufacturing economy, 19 percent of the sector’s gross domestic product (GDP) contracted in April, compared to 16 percent in March, and the percentage of manufacturing GDP in strong contraction (defined as a composite PMI® of 45 percent or lower) decreased to 2 percent, compared to 4 percent in March. The share of sector GDP with a PMI® at or below 45 percent is a good metric to gauge overall manufacturing weakness. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, four (Transportation Equipment; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) expanded in April,” says Spence.
The 13 manufacturing industries reporting growth in April — listed in order — are: Textile Mills; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Primary Metals; Plastics & Rubber Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Transportation Equipment; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Paper Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Chemical Products; and Furniture & Related Products. The three industries reporting contraction in April are: Wood Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products.
WHAT RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING
“Demand for manufactured goods is trending higher versus last year; however, geopolitical uncertainty and rising oil and diesel prices continue to weigh on demand. Many customers are exercising caution and remain in a wait-and-watch mode.” [Transportation Equipment]”Continued tariffs on products utilized in our product lines are being monitored by the business, with the business working to mitigate or limit tariff risk. Geopolitical risk, especially in the Middle East, as it pertains to commodity and energy markets remains a concern and is being monitored by the business. Supply chain risk concerns pertaining to increased cost and transit time for rerouted shipments due to conflict in the Red Sea, Strait of Hormuz and Suez Canal. These conditions are being monitored by the business and rerouting measures have been implemented where possible.” [Transportation Equipment]”Continuing fluctuation in U.S. tariffs as well as market constraints for certain materials are affecting our current business. U.S. support of AI-related industry is also in flux which is causing some customer and investment hesitancy.” [Computer & Electronic Products]”All products tied to crude, polyethylene resin or energy (liquified natural gas) have seen multiple increase spikes tied to the Iran crisis and market supply inflation.” [Chemical Products]”Revenues are very strong. However, price increases are similar to a few years ago with the supply chain crisis. All imports from China are up 15 percent to 25 percent, which is impossible for us to absorb or to fully pass along. Our suppliers in China are telling us that oil is at an all-time high, which is putting huge challenges on their cost structures.” [Chemical Products]”General uncertainty over the total impact of the U.S.-Iran war. Have not yet started to see the full impact of fuel increases but are aware they are coming.” [Machinery]”Business levels have been decent this year, in line with the same period last year and improved from the second half of 2025. However, higher cost pressures are impacting margins.” [Fabricated Metal Products]”Commodity markets remain mixed, with pockets of easing offset by ongoing volatility. Dairy and some soft commodities have cooled, while oils and grain-related inputs remain elevated given biofuel demand and feed costs. Pricing is still sensitive to policy changes, weather and global trade dynamics.” [Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products]”Our business remains strong and stable, but there are a lot of concerns in the geopolitical arena. If the Iran conflict persists, the impact on market pricing and supply continuity could be extreme. Electronics component market remains very volatile (pricing and continuity) based on AI.” [Miscellaneous Manufacturing]
April 2026
Index
Series
Index
Apr
Series
Index
Mar
Percentage
Point
Change
Direction
Rate of
Change
Trend*
(Months)
Manufacturing
PMI®
52.7
52.7
0.0
Growing
Same
4
New Orders
54.1
53.5
+0.6
Growing
Faster
4
Production
53.4
55.1
-1.7
Growing
Slower
6
Employment
46.4
48.7
-2.3
Contracting
Faster
31
Supplier
Deliveries
60.6
58.9
+1.7
Slowing
Faster
5
Inventories
49.0
47.1
+1.9
Contracting
Slower
12
Customers’
Inventories
39.1
40.1
-1.0
Too Low
Faster
19
Prices
84.6
78.3
+6.3
Increasing
Faster
19
Backlog of
Orders
51.4
54.4
-3.0
Growing
Slower
4
New Export
Orders
47.9
49.9
-2.0
Contracting
Faster
2
Imports
50.3
52.6
-2.3
Growing
Slower
3
OVERALL ECONOMY
Growing
Same
18
Manufacturing Sector
Growing
Same
4
ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report data is seasonally adjusted for the New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories indexes.
*Number of months moving in current direction.
COMMODITIES REPORTED UP/DOWN IN PRICE AND IN SHORT SUPPLY
Commodities Up in Price
Acrylic Products; Adhesives; Aluminum (29); Aluminum Products; Caustic Soda; Chemical Products (2); Cooking Fats and Oils (2); Copper (10); Copper Based Products (5); Corn (2); Corrugated Products; Diesel Fuel (2); Electronic Components (4); Freight (2); Fuel (2); High Density Polyethylene (HDPE); Logistics Services; Memory Components (2); Metal Products; Methanol (2); Nickel Products; Nylon; Oil; Oil Based Products; Packaging; Paint; Paper Products; Petroleum Based Products; Plastic Based Products; Plastics (2); Polyester; Polyethylene Resins; Polyethylene Terephthalate; Polyvinyl Chloride; Resins (3); Solvents; Soybean Products (2); Steel (6); Steel — Carbon; Steel — Hot Rolled (4); Steel — Stainless (3); Steel Products (5); Sulfur Products; Transportation Costs; Tungsten Products (3); and Wire and Cable.
Commodities Down in Price
Natural Gas.
Commodities in Short Supply
Aluminum; Bearing Components (2); Electrical Components (10); Electronic Components (14); Memory (4); Propylene Glycol; and Semiconductors (2).
Note: The number of consecutive months the commodity is listed is indicated after each item.
APRIL 2026 MANUFACTURING INDEX SUMMARIES
Manufacturing PMI®
The U.S. manufacturing sector expanded in April for the fourth straight month following a 10-month period of contraction, registering 52.7 percent, the same reading as March. Of the five subindexes that directly factor into the Manufacturing PMI®, three (New Orders, Production and Supplier Deliveries) were in expansion territory, the same as in March. The Employment and Inventories indexes stayed in contraction, with Employment in decline compared to March. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, four (Transportation Equipment; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) expanded in April. A reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing sector is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally contracting.
A Manufacturing PMI® above 47.5 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy. Therefore, the April Manufacturing PMI® indicates the overall economy grew for the 18th straight month. “The past relationship between the Manufacturing PMI® and the overall economy indicates that the April reading (52.7 percent) corresponds to a 1.8-percent increase in real gross domestic product (GDP) on an annualized basis,” says Spence.
THE LAST 12 MONTHS
Month
Manufacturing
PMI®
Month
Manufacturing
PMI®
Apr 2026
52.7
Oct 2025
48.8
Mar 2026
52.7
Sep 2025
48.9
Feb 2026
52.4
Aug 2025
48.9
Jan 2026
52.6
Jul 2025
48.4
Dec 2025
47.9
Jun 2025
49.0
Nov 2025
48.0
May 2025
48.6
Average for 12 months – 49.9
High – 52.7
Low – 47.9
New Orders
ISM®’s New Orders Index expanded in April with a reading of 54.1 percent, an increase of 0.6 percentage point compared to March’s reading of 53.5 percent. “Of the six largest manufacturing industries, four (Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; Machinery; and Chemical Products) reported increased new orders. Demand sentiment was positive, with a 1.6-to-1.0 ratio of positive to negative comments in April. A number of the positive comments noted, however, that customers were ordering to get ahead of price increases,” says Spence. A New Orders Index above 51.9 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Census Bureau’s series on manufacturing orders (in constant 2000 dollars).
The 12 manufacturing industries that reported growth in new orders in April, in order, are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Textile Mills; Plastics & Rubber Products; Transportation Equipment; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Computer & Electronic Products; Primary Metals; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Fabricated Metal Products; and Chemical Products. The three industries reporting a decline in new orders in April are: Printing & Related Support Activities; Wood Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products.
New Orders
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
31.6
53.2
15.2
+16.4
54.1
Mar 2026
29.1
56.3
14.6
+14.5
53.5
Feb 2026
30.3
56.9
12.8
+17.5
55.8
Jan 2026
31.4
51.0
17.6
+13.8
57.1
Production
The Production Index expanded in April for the sixth month in a row, registering 53.4 percent, a 1.7-percentage point decrease compared to March’s reading of 55.1 percent. “Of the six largest manufacturing industries, four (Transportation Equipment; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) reported increased production. For a second month in a row, panelists had a 2-to-1 ratio of positive to negative comments regarding output,” says Spence. An index above 52 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Federal Reserve Board’s Industrial Production figures.
The 11 industries reporting growth in production during the month of April — listed in order — are: Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Textile Mills; Plastics & Rubber Products; Transportation Equipment; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Primary Metals; Machinery; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Computer & Electronic Products; Chemical Products; and Fabricated Metal Products. The two industries reporting a decrease in production in April are: Wood Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products.
Production
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
28.3
58.7
13.0
+15.3
53.4
Mar 2026
24.5
62.8
12.7
+11.8
55.1
Feb 2026
25.2
58.8
16.0
+9.2
53.5
Jan 2026
25.7
58.8
15.5
+10.2
55.9
Employment
ISM®’s Employment Index registered 46.4 percent in April, 2.3 percentage points lower than March’s reading of 48.7 percent. “The index posted its 31st consecutive month of contraction after expanding in September 2023. Since January 2023, the Employment Index has contracted in 39 of 40 months. Of the six big manufacturing industries, three (Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; and Machinery) reported higher levels of employment in April. For every comment on hiring, there was 1.7 on reducing head counts,” says Spence. An Employment Index above 50.3 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.
Of the 18 manufacturing industries, five reported employment growth in April: Printing & Related Support Activities; Transportation Equipment; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Computer & Electronic Products; and Machinery. The eight industries reporting a decrease in employment in April, in the following order, are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Textile Mills; Wood Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Plastics & Rubber Products; and Chemical Products.
Employment
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
17.5
62.3
20.2
-2.7
46.4
Mar 2026
14.2
70.8
15.0
-0.8
48.7
Feb 2026
18.8
60.8
20.4
-1.6
48.8
Jan 2026
13.7
68.0
18.3
-4.6
48.1
Supplier Deliveries†
Delivery performance of suppliers to manufacturing organizations was slower in April for the fifth consecutive month after one month of faster deliveries. “The Supplier Deliveries Index registered 60.6 percent, a 1.7-percentage point increase compared to the reading of 58.9 percent reported in March. Of the six big industries, five (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Machinery; Chemical Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Transportation Equipment) reported slower supplier deliveries” says Spence. A reading below 50 percent indicates faster deliveries, while a reading above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries.
The 14 manufacturing industries reporting slower supplier deliveries in April, in order, are: Textile Mills; Paper Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Primary Metals; Fabricated Metal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Machinery; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Chemical Products; Furniture & Related Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Computer & Electronic Products; and Transportation Equipment. No industry reported faster deliveries in April.
Supplier
Deliveries
%Slower
%Same
%Faster
Net
Index
Apr 2026
22.6
75.9
1.5
+21.1
60.6
Mar 2026
19.5
78.8
1.7
+17.8
58.9
Feb 2026
14.0
82.2
3.8
+10.2
55.1
Jan 2026
12.7
83.3
4.0
+8.7
54.4
Inventories
The Inventories Index registered 49 percent in April, up 1.9 percentage points compared to the reading of 47.1 percent in March. “Only one (Chemical Products) of the six big industries expanded inventories in April,” says Spence. An Inventories Index greater than 44.5 percent, over time, is generally consistent with expansion in the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) figures on overall manufacturing inventories (in chained 2000 dollars).
Of 18 manufacturing industries, the five reporting higher inventories in April are: Textile Mills; Primary Metals; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Chemical Products. The eight industries reporting lower inventories in April — listed in order — are: Wood Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Transportation Equipment; and Machinery.
Inventories
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
14.5
68.3
17.2
-2.7
49.0
Mar 2026
16.7
64.3
19.0
-2.3
47.1
Feb 2026
14.2
71.8
14.0
+0.2
48.8
Jan 2026
14.0
66.4
19.6
-5.6
47.6
Customers’ Inventories†
ISM®’s Customers’ Inventories Index remained in “too low” territory in April with reading of 39.1 percent, a decrease of 1 percentage point compared to the 40.1 percent reported in March. In the last four months, this index has averaged 39.2 percent, its lowest levels since it averaged 33.1 percent over a 25-month period ending in August 2022. (For more information about the Customers’ Inventories Index, see the “Data and Method of Presentation” section below.)
The only industry to report that customers’ inventories were too high in April was Miscellaneous Manufacturing. The 11 industries reporting customers’ inventories as too low in April, in order, are: Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Primary Metals; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Plastics & Rubber Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Furniture & Related Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Machinery; Chemical Products; and Fabricated Metal Products. Six industries reported no change in customers’ inventories in April compared to March.
Customers’
Inventories
%
Reporting
%Too High
%About Right
%Too Low
Net
Index
Apr 2026
73
7.6
62.9
29.5
-21.9
39.1
Mar 2026
74
6.9
66.3
26.8
-19.9
40.1
Feb 2026
76
5.7
66.1
28.2
-22.5
38.8
Jan 2026
69
5.5
66.3
28.2
-22.7
38.7
Prices†
The ISM® Prices Index registered 84.6 percent in April, an increase of 6.3 percentage points over its March reading of 78.3 percent, indicating raw materials prices increased for the 19th straight month. The Prices Index has risen 25.6 percentage points in the last three months to hit its highest reading since April 2022 (84.6 percent). All the six largest manufacturing industries — Chemical Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Machinery; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Transportation Equipment, in that order — reported price increases in April. “As was the case in March, the Prices Index reading continues to be driven by (1) increases in steel and aluminum prices that impact the entire value chain, (2) tariffs applied to many imported goods and now (3) increases in petroleum-based products as a result of the Middle East conflict. Higher prices were reported by 70.3 percent of respondents in April, up 10.9 percentage points from March’s 59.4 percent,” says Spence. A Prices Index above 52.8 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Producer Price Index for Intermediate Materials.
In April, the 17 industries that reported paying increased prices for raw materials, in order, are: Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Paper Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Textile Mills; Wood Products; Primary Metals; Furniture & Related Products; Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Petroleum & Coal Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Machinery; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Transportation Equipment; and Apparel, Leather & Allied Products. No industries reported paying decreased prices for raw materials in April.
Prices
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
70.3
28.5
1.2
+69.1
84.6
Mar 2026
59.4
37.8
2.8
+56.6
78.3
Feb 2026
45.4
50.2
4.4
+41.0
70.5
Jan 2026
29.0
59.9
11.1
+17.9
59.0
Backlog of Orders†
ISM®’s Backlog of Orders Index registered 51.4 percent in April, a decrease of 3 percentage points compared to the March reading of 54.4 percent. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, two (Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) reported expansion in order backlogs in April.
The eight industries reporting higher backlogs in April — listed in order — are: Textile Mills; Fabricated Metal Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Paper Products; Primary Metals; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products. The five industries reporting lower backlogs in April are: Petroleum & Coal Products; Machinery; Plastics & Rubber Products; Transportation Equipment; and Wood Products.
Backlog of
Orders
% Reporting
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
90
22.1
58.6
19.3
+2.8
51.4
Mar 2026
90
24.6
59.6
15.8
+8.8
54.4
Feb 2026
90
26.8
59.5
13.7
+13.1
56.6
Jan 2026
90
22.2
58.8
19.0
+3.2
51.6
New Export Orders†
ISM®’s New Export Orders Index registered 47.9 percent, down 2 percentage points from March’s reading of 49.9 percent. “Trade and war frictions continue to be a major concern. For every positive comment on exports, there was 1.6 negative comments,” says Spence.
Of the 18 manufacturing industries, the three that reported growth in new export orders in April are: Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Primary Metals; and Computer & Electronic Products. The 10 industries that reported a decrease in new export orders in April — in the following order — are: Wood Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Paper Products; Furniture & Related Products; Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Machinery; and Chemical Products.
New Export
Orders
%
Reporting
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
75
10.4
75.0
14.6
-4.2
47.9
Mar 2026
74
12.1
75.5
12.4
-0.3
49.9
Feb 2026
74
9.2
82.2
8.6
+0.6
50.3
Jan 2026
73
11.5
77.3
11.2
+0.3
50.2
Imports†
ISM®’s Imports Index decreased in April to 50.3 percent, a 2.3-percentage point drop compared to March’s reading of 52.6 percent.
The eight industries reporting higher imports in April — in the following order — are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Textile Mills; Transportation Equipment; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Computer & Electronic Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; and Machinery. The four industries that reported lower volumes in April are: Paper Products; Wood Products; Furniture & Related Products; and Chemical Products. Six industries reported no change in imports in April compared to March.
Imports
%
Reporting
%Higher
%Same
%Lower
Net
Index
Apr 2026
85
10.6
79.3
10.1
+0.5
50.3
Mar 2026
87
15.1
75.0
9.9
+5.2
52.6
Feb 2026
87
15.8
78.1
6.1
+9.7
54.9
Jan 2026
85
11.3
77.4
11.3
0.0
50.0
†The Supplier Deliveries, Customers’ Inventories, Prices, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders, and Imports indexes do not meet the accepted criteria for seasonal adjustments.
Buying Policy
The average commitment lead time for Capital Expenditures in April was 174 days, an increase of four days compared to March. The average lead time in April for Production Materials was 81 days, a decrease of one day compared to March. The average lead time for Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies was 46 days, an increase of two days compared to March.
Percent Reporting
Capital
Expenditures
Hand-to-
Mouth
30 Days
60 Days
90 Days
6 Months
1 Year+
Average
Days
Apr 2026
15
4
7
13
35
26
174
Mar 2026
17
3
10
12
32
26
170
Feb 2026
18
3
7
14
27
31
179
Jan 2026
18
5
9
10
30
28
172
Percent Reporting
Production
Materials
Hand-to-
Mouth
30 Days
60 Days
90 Days
6 Months
1 Year+
Average
Days
Apr 2026
7
26
25
28
10
4
81
Mar 2026
8
26
27
26
7
6
82
Feb 2026
9
25
26
26
10
4
79
Jan 2026
8
26
26
27
9
4
79
Percent Reporting
MRO Supplies
Hand-to-
Mouth
30 Days
60 Days
90 Days
6 Months
1 Year+
Average
Days
Apr 2026
27
36
18
14
4
1
46
Mar 2026
29
38
15
13
4
1
44
Feb 2026
29
37
18
11
3
2
46
Jan 2026
31
37
15
12
5
0
41
About This Report
DO NOT CONFUSE THIS NATIONAL REPORT with the various regional purchasing reports released across the country. The national report’s information reflects the entire U.S., while the regional reports contain primarily regional data from their local vicinities. Also, the information in the regional reports is not used in calculating the results of the national report. The information compiled in this report is for the month of April 2026.
The data presented herein is obtained from a survey of manufacturing supply executives based on information they have collected within their respective organizations. ISM® makes no representation, other than that stated within this release, regarding the individual company data collection procedures. The data should be compared to all other economic data sources when used in decision-making.
Data and Method of Presentation
The ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report is based on data compiled from purchasing and supply executives nationwide. The composition of the Manufacturing Business Survey Panel is stratified according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and each of the following NAICS-based industries’ contribution to gross domestic product (GDP): Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Textile Mills; Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Wood Products; Paper Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Petroleum & Coal Products; Chemical Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Primary Metals; Fabricated Metal Products; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Furniture & Related Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing (products such as medical equipment and supplies, jewelry, sporting goods, toys and office supplies). The data are weighted based on each industry’s contribution to GDP. According to U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) estimates (the average of the fourth quarter 2024 GDP estimate and the GDP estimates for first, second, and third quarter 2025, as released on January 22, 2026), the six largest manufacturing industries are: Chemical Products; Transportation Equipment; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Machinery; and Petroleum & Coal Products.
Survey responses reflect the change, if any, in the current month compared to the previous month. For nine indicators (New Orders, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders, Imports, Production, Supplier Deliveries, Inventories, Employment, and Prices), this report shows the percentage reporting each response, the net difference between the number of responses in the positive economic direction (higher, better and slower for Supplier Deliveries) and the negative economic direction (lower, worse and faster for Supplier Deliveries), and the diffusion index. For Customers’ Inventories, respondents report their assessment of their customers’ stock levels of respondent companies’ products this month (rather than last month): too high, about right, and too low. Responses are raw data and are never changed. The diffusion index includes the percent of positive responses plus one-half of those responding the same (considered positive).
The resulting single index number for those meeting the criteria for seasonal adjustments (Manufacturing PMI®, New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories) is then seasonally adjusted to allow for the effects of repetitive intra-year variations resulting primarily from normal differences in weather conditions, various institutional arrangements, and differences attributable to non-moveable holidays. All seasonal adjustment factors are subject annually to relatively minor changes when conditions warrant them. The Manufacturing PMI® is a composite index based on the diffusion indexes of five of the indexes with equal weights: New Orders (seasonally adjusted), Production (seasonally adjusted), Employment (seasonally adjusted), Supplier Deliveries, and Inventories (seasonally adjusted).
Diffusion indexes have the properties of leading indicators and are convenient summary measures showing the prevailing direction of change and the scope of change. A Manufacturing PMI® reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing economy is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally declining. A Manufacturing PMI® above 47.5 percent, over a period of time, indicates that the overall economy, or gross domestic product (GDP), is generally expanding; below 47.5 percent, it is generally declining. The distance from 50 percent or 47.5 percent is indicative of the extent of the expansion or decline. With some of the indicators within this report, ISM® has indicated the departure point between expansion and decline of comparable government series, as determined by regression analysis. For the Customers’ Inventories Index, numerically, a reading: above 50 percent is “too high,” equal to 50 percent is “about right,” and below 50 percent is “too low.” However, in practice and in the context of other data, customers’ inventories may be considered to be “about right” if the diffusion index is between 52 percent (the high side of about right) and 48 percent (the low side of about right).
The ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report survey is sent out to Manufacturing Business Survey Panel respondents the first part of each month. Respondents are asked to report on information for the current month for U.S. operations only. ISM® receives survey responses throughout most of any given month, with the majority of respondents generally waiting until late in the month to submit responses to give the most accurate picture of current business activity. ISM® then compiles the report for release on the first business day of the following month.
The industries reporting growth, as indicated in the ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report, are listed in the order of most growth to least growth. For the industries reporting contraction or decreases, those are listed in the order of the highest level of contraction/decrease to the least level of contraction/decrease.
Responses to Buying Policy reflect the percent reporting the current month’s lead time, the approximate weighted number of days ahead for which commitments are made for Capital Expenditures; Production Materials; and Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies, expressed as hand-to-mouth (five days), 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, six months (180 days), a year or more (360 days), and the weighted average number of days. These responses are raw data, never revised, and not seasonally adjusted.
ISM PMI® Content
The Institute for Supply Management® (“ISM®”) PMI® Reports, formerly Report On Business®, (Manufacturing and Services reports) (“ISM PMI®”) contain information, text, files, images, video, sounds, musical works, works of authorship, applications, and any other materials or content (collectively, “Content”) of ISM (“ISM PMI® Content”). ISM PMI® Content is protected by copyright, trademark, trade secret, and other laws, and as between you and ISM, ISM owns and retains all rights in the ISM PMI® Content. ISM hereby grants you a limited, revocable, nonsublicensable license to access and display on your individual device the ISM PMI® Content (excluding any software code) solely for your personal, non-commercial use. The ISM PMI® Content shall also contain Content of users and other ISM licensors. Except as provided herein or as explicitly allowed in writing by ISM, you shall not copy, download, stream, capture, reproduce, duplicate, archive, upload, modify, translate, publish, broadcast, transmit, retransmit, distribute, perform, display, sell, or otherwise use any ISM PMI® Content.
Except as explicitly and expressly permitted by ISM, you are strictly prohibited from creating works or materials (including but not limited to tables, charts, data streams, time-series variables, fonts, icons, link buttons, wallpaper, desktop themes, online postcards, montages, mashups and similar videos, greeting cards, and unlicensed merchandise) that derive from or are based on the ISM PMI® Content. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the derivative works or materials are sold, bartered, or given away. You shall not either directly or through the use of any device, software, internet site, web-based service, or other means remove, alter, bypass, avoid, interfere with, or circumvent any copyright, trademark, or other proprietary notices marked on the Content or any digital rights management mechanism, device, or other content protection or access control measure associated with the Content including geo-filtering mechanisms. Without prior written authorization from ISM, you shall not build a business utilizing the Content, whether or not for profit.
You shall not create, recreate, distribute, incorporate in other work, or advertise an index of any portion of the Content unless you receive prior written authorization from ISM. Requests for permission to reproduce or distribute ISM PMI® Content can be made by contacting in writing at: ISM Research, Institute for Supply Management, 309 West Elliot Road, Suite 113, Tempe, Arizona 85284-1556, or by emailing kcahill@ismworld.org. Subject: Content Request.
ISM shall not have any liability, duty, or obligation for or relating to the ISM PMI® Content or other information contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in providing any ISM PMI® Content or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. In no event shall ISM be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of the use of the ISM PMI®. Report On Business®, PMI®, Manufacturing PMI® and Services PMI® are registered trademarks of Institute for Supply Management®. Institute for Supply Management® and ISM® are registered trademarks of Institute for Supply Management, Inc.
About Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®)
Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) is the first and leading not-for-profit professional supply management organization worldwide. Its community of more than 50,000 in more than 100 countries around the world manage about US$1 trillion in corporate and government supply chain procurement annually. Founded in 1915 by practitioners, ISM is committed to advancing the strategy and practice of integrated, end-to-end supply chain management through leading edge data-driven resources, community, and education to empower individuals, create organizational value and to drive competitive advantage. ISM’s vision is to foster a prosperous, sustainable world. ISM empowers and leads the profession through the ISM® PMI® Reports (formerly Report On Business®), its highly regarded certification and training programs, corporate services, events and assessments. The ISM® PMI® Reports — Manufacturing and Services — are two of the most reliable economic indicators available, providing guidance to supply management professionals, economists, analysts, and government and business leaders. For more information, please visit: www.ismworld.org.
The full text version of the ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report is posted on ISM®’s website at www.ismrob.org on the first business day* of every month after 10:00 a.m. ET. The one exception is in January when the report is released on the second business day of the month.
The next ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report featuring May 2026 data will be released at 10:00 a.m. ET on Monday, June 1, 2026.
*Unless the New York Stock Exchange is closed.
Contact:
Kristina Cahill
PMI® Reports Analyst
ISM®, PMI®/Research Manager
Tempe, Arizona
+1 480.455.5910
Email: kcahill@ismworld.org
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/manufacturing-pmi-at-52-7-april-2026-ism-manufacturing-pmi-report-302759226.html
SOURCE Institute for Supply Management
You may like
Technology
BillionToOne Launches Unity Confirm™: A category-defining test that bridges the gap between screening and invasive diagnostics
Published
2 hours agoon
May 1, 2026By
A breakthrough in prenatal care, Unity Confirm enables non-invasive confirmation for high-risk screening results through the capture of intact circulating fetal cells using BillionToOne’s Fetal Cell Capture™ Technology
MENLO PARK, Calif., May 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — For more than two decades, the ultimate quest for scientists and clinicians studying prenatal genetics was the capture of an intact fetal cell non-invasively so that its fetal DNA could be directly analyzed. While cell-free DNA has revolutionized prenatal genetics, it left an uncertainty—a gap between screening and invasive diagnostics, for patients who cannot, or choose not to, access invasive diagnostics. Today, BillionToOne, Inc. (Nasdaq: BLLN), a next-generation molecular diagnostics company with a mission to create powerful and accurate tests that are accessible to all, announced the launch of Unity Confirm™, a circulating fetal cell-based, non-invasive confirmation test, designed to address this need from a simple maternal blood draw.
Since its introduction in the early 2010s, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become the standard of care for screening for fetal aneuploidies. However, when screening returns a high-risk result, clinical guidelines recommend diagnostic confirmation via chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis. These invasive procedures carry a small but real risk of pregnancy loss, and are increasingly difficult to access. The majority of patients decline, leaving clinicians and families without the information needed to guide next steps, and widening gaps in inequitable care.
While cell-based prenatal genetics has been studied since before the advent of cell-free DNA tests, the scientific barrier has long been the rarity and fragility of fetal cells in maternal circulation. Presenting at fewer than one cell per milliliter of blood and nearly indistinguishable from millions of surrounding maternal cells, intact circulating fetal cells have been too difficult to isolate in an accessible way for clinical use. The cell-based approaches were previously studied across multiple independent publications1 in more than 1,500 patients, consistently demonstrating that when a fetal cell is captured and sequenced, it provides an accurate result that has extremely high concordance with invasive diagnostic testing. However, these methodologies have stayed too academic, expensive, and inaccessible.
Unity Confirm addresses this directly. Available for all patients who use UNITY Aneuploidy for their front-line screen*, BillionToOne’s Fetal Cell Capture™ technology, a multi-step immunological enrichment and single cell isolation process, isolates intact circulating fetal cells, effectively providing 100% fetal fraction2, and performs whole genome sequencing on each individual cell. By analyzing the direct fetal cells rather than fragmentary cfDNA, similar to invasive procedures, Unity Confirm delivers rapid CVS-like insights3 non-invasively, from a single blood draw.
“For years, the idea of capturing whole fetal cells non-invasively was largely viewed as an elusive holy grail, something theoretically possible but practically out of reach,” said Oguzhan Atay, PhD, Co-founder and CEO of BillionToOne. “Unity Confirm is proof that it does not have to be. For the first time, a clinician can confirm a high-risk prenatal result non-invasively, with a level of accuracy the field has never before seen outside of an invasive procedure. For the first time, this technology is broadly accessible.”
“A high-risk NIPT result does not give you a diagnosis. It gives you a decision to make under enormous stress, often without enough information,” said Haywood Brown, MD, Chief Medical Officer, Prenatal, BillionToOne. “For too long, the options were limited: forgo confirmation, or undergo an invasive procedure with a small but real risk. What makes Unity Confirm truly different is not just the science; it is that this capability is now clinically accessible. That’s not an incremental improvement. That is a fundamentally different standard of care.”
In BillionToOne’s own clinical validation, Unity Confirm demonstrated 100% concordance with known fetal outcomes and invasive diagnostic results across 16 of 16 samples, including affected fetuses for common aneuploidies and 22q11.2 microdeletion. The clinical data supporting Unity Confirm will be presented at ACOG 2026 in Washington, D.C., presenting the science behind the technology to the broader OB/GYN community for the first time. Beginning on May 28, providers using Unity Aneuploidy™ Screen will have access to Unity Confirm following a high-risk result. To further validate performance at scale, BillionToOne is now enrolling in the largest prospective study of a fetal cell-based confirmation assay with invasive diagnostic outcomes, targeting enrollment of 1,000 patients and measuring concordance to invasive diagnostic testing.
*Unity Confirm is intended for patients who cannot, or choose not to, pursue invasive diagnostic testing following a high-risk Unity Aneuploidy Screen result before 16 weeks of gestation. Available for Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13, 22q11.2 microdeletion, XXY, XYY, and XXX aneuploidies. Requires Unity Aneuploidy Screen as the frontline screen for the pregnancy.
Sources
1Hatt, Lotte, et al. “A new marker set that identifies fetal cells in maternal circulation with high specificity.” Prenatal Diagnosis 34.11 (2014): 1066-1072.; Stampalija, T., et al. “Single-cell-based non-invasive screening for fetal pathogenic microimbalances using maternal blood: comparison with invasive prenatal diagnosis.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (2026).; Weymaere, Jana, et al. “Enrichment of circulating trophoblasts from maternal blood using filtration-based Metacell® technology.” Plos one 17.7 (2022):e0271226.; Jeppesen, Line Dahl, et al. “Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy and Sex Chromosomal Anomalies in a Pregnant Woman with Mosaicism for Turner Syndrome—Applications and Advantages of Cell-Based NIPT.” Frontiers in Genetics 12 (2021): 741752.; Bellair, Michelle, et al. “Noninvasive single-cell-based prenatal genetic testing: A proof of concept clinical study.” Prenatal Diagnosis 44.3 (2024):304-316.; Chakchouk, Imen, and Ignatia B. Van den Veyver. “Whole-Genome Amplification on Single Circulating Trophoblast Cell.” Whole Genome Amplification: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer US, 2026. 11-23.; Zhuo, Xinming, et al. “Use of amplicon-based sequencing for testing fetal identity and monogenic traits with Single Circulating Trophoblast (SCT) as one form of cell-based NIPT.” PLoSOne 16.4 (2021): e0249695.
2In rare instances, results may rely on a single cell that is co-sequenced with 1-2 maternal cells, which may reduce fetal fraction to 50% or 33%. When this occurs, the report clearly indicates this limitation.
3Unity Confirm and rapid CVS both analyze fetal-derived trophoblast cells. Unity Confirm isolates individual cells via whole genome sequencing (WGS), which is performed on each cell separately, whereas rapid CVS is often performed via FISH. While rapid CVS may analyze more cells, WGS generates more data per cell. In both rapid CVS and fetal cell capture, mosaicism cannot be excluded. Unity Confirm may have false-positive and false-negative results. Results are not a guaranty. Important medical decisions should not rely on UnityConfirm test results alone. Clinical correlation is necessary. Unity Confirm is a laboratory-developed test performed in a CLIA-certified and CAP-accredited laboratory. It is not an FDA-approved or FDA-cleared diagnostic test. Test performance may vary based on gestational age and other factors.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the clinical effectiveness of Unity Confirm. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, forecasts and assumptions, and actual outcomes and results could differ materially from these statements due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond BillionToOne’s control. These and additional risks and uncertainties could affect BillionToOne’s financial and operating results and cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this press release. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk that Unity Confirm is not clinically effective and not adopted by healthcare professionals and those discussed under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and elsewhere in BillionToOne’s most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to BillionToOne as of the date hereof, and BillionToOne disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements provided to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based, except as required by law. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing BillionToOne’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.
About BillionToOne
Headquartered in Menlo Park, California, BillionToOne is a next-generation molecular diagnostics company with a mission to create powerful and accurate tests that are accessible to all. The company’s patented Quantitative Counting Templates™ (QCT™) molecular counting platform is the only multiplex technology that can accurately count DNA molecules at the single-molecule level. For more information, visit www.billiontoone.com.
Media Contact
billiontoone@moxiegrouppr.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/billiontoone-launches-unity-confirm-a-category-defining-test-that-bridges-the-gap-between-screening-and-invasive-diagnostics-302760412.html
SOURCE BillionToOne
Brockton High School Students Premiere Original Films Exploring Mental Wellness and Leadership
Twenty-three student creators showcase cinematic takes on boundaries, bias, and leadership; selected works to advance to the National SALT 12 Film Festival.
BROCKTON, Mass., May 1, 2026 /PRNewswire-HISPANIC PR WIRE/ — Brockton High School hosted the 2026 Brockton High School Film Festival, a community celebration of student voice and mental wellness. Organized by the nonprofit SALT ED Inc., the event premiered five original short films created by 23 students participating in the “Reel Funny” program.
Unlike traditional film programs, Reel Funny uses media production as a vehicle for personal growth rather than just technical instruction. The program guides students through a series of workshops focused on “soft skills”—including conflict resolution, recognizing internal bias, and establishing healthy personal boundaries. Students are then challenged to apply these lessons by collaborating in groups to write, produce, and edit their own films entirely independently.
A unique and critical component of the Reel Funny process is its integration of mental health professional oversight. Following the students’ film submissions, Eun Joo You, a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) with Care Plus New Jersey, conducted a specialized screening of the works. This clinical review serves to evaluate student mental wellness and identify early signs of emotional distress, followed by direct engagement with the students to discuss their creative themes and overall well-being.
“The opportunity for our students to engage in this type of work is paramount to their development as well-rounded individuals,” said Kevin McCaskill, Principal of Brockton High School. “When we talk about preparing the next generation of leaders, we aren’t just talking about academics; we are talking about the emotional intelligence and self-awareness that programs like ‘Reel Funny’ provide. These films are a powerful reflection of their growth.”
The celebration invited friends, families, and local community members to acknowledge the leadership and vulnerability displayed by these young creators.
“This program empowers students to turn self-reflection into a leadership tool,” said Joonho Lee, CEO of Kbean®, a primary supporter of the initiative. “By giving students the autonomy to produce these films on their own terms, we see a level of authenticity that traditional education often misses.”
Looking Ahead: The SALT 12 National Showcase
The Brockton High School festival serves as a qualifying event for the 3rd Annual SALT 12 Film Festival scheduled for the end of 2026. SALT 12 is a national platform that gathers the most impactful student films from across the country, allowing participants to share their voices with a public audience and compete for national recognition.
For more information about SALT ED Inc., the Reel Funny curriculum, or the upcoming SALT 12 National Showcase, please visit www.salt-ed.org.
About SALT ED Inc.
SALT ED Inc. is a nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering underserved youth through media production, workforce development, and mental wellness initiatives. Their signature “Reel Funny” program helps students develop the emotional intelligence and leadership skills necessary to succeed as next-generation leaders.
Photo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2954869/Picture1.jpg
Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1897111/5888831/Kbean_Logo.jpg
SOURCE Kbean
Technology
Products That Count Announces the Winners of the 2026 CPO Awards, Honoring the Product Leaders Redefining Their Craft in the AI Era
Published
3 hours agoon
May 1, 2026By
The annual Awards recognize Chief Product Officers whose scope, influence, and impact have expanded dramatically as AI reshapes every organization.
SAN FRANCISCO, May 1, 2026 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ — Products That Count, the world’s largest nonprofit community of product managers with over 600,000 members, today announced the winners of the 2026 CPO Awards. The Awards, produced in partnership with Mighty Capital, celebrate the Chief Product Officers whose leadership is shaping how products are built, shipped, and scaled in a moment of unprecedented change.
The role of the Chief Product Officer has never been broader. Today’s CPOs are architecting the systems, teams, and decisions that determine whether their companies win in the AI era.
The 2026 CPO Award Winners, by category:
President / CEO: Former CPOs who have elevated to the top role.
Eglae Recchia, CPO, Keyway
Maria Thomas, CEO (promoted from CPO), Rebrandly
Nabil Bukhari, President, Extreme Networks
Shiven Ramji, President & Chief Product Officer, Okta
Investor Mindset: Treating product like a portfolio of bets, with M&A as a strategic lever.
Achuth Rao, CPO, New York Life Insurance Company
Andrew Tsao, CPO & Analytics Officer, Audible
Dane Glasgow, CPO, Paramount/Skydance
Diana Benli, Chief Product Officer, Cognizant
Diego Dugatkin, Chief Product Officer, Box
Mike Bidgoli, CPO & CTO, Tubi
Vasu Murthy, CPO, Cohesity
Vrushali Paunikar, CPO, Carta
Ambrish Verma, Chief Product Officer, Ingram Micro
Enterprise Scale: Operating in complexity. Not speed alone, but transformation at scale.
Carla Guzzetti, Chief Product Officer, Cloud Applications, Extreme Networks
Eddie Garcia, Chief Product Officer, eBay
Gautam Shah, Chief Product Officer, Carelon
Ghazal Badiozamani, SVP of Product Management, Cengage
Kelli Fielding, Chief Product Officer, Europe, TransUnion
Mikhail Vaysbukh, Chief Product Officer, Elsevier
Monica Ugwi, GM, Copilot + Agents for Manufacturing & Mobility, formerly Microsoft
Randall Hounsell, SVP Connected Living Product, Comcast
Rita Khan, Chief Consumer & Digital Officer, formerly Optum
Ryan Bergstrom, Chief Product Officer, Paychex
Tim Simmons, Chief Product Officer, formerly Walmart International
Tina Tarquinio, Chief Product Officer, IBM Z and LinuxONE, IBM
Todd Garner, CPO, Sam’s Club
Trey Courtney, Global Chief Product & Partnerships Officer, Mood Media
Wyatt Jenkins, SVP Product, Intuit
Shayani Roy, SVP Product Management and Design, OpenTable
Scale Up: Growth-stage leaders putting the scale in place.
Aaron Seevers, Chief Product Officer, Noom
Avijit Sinha, SVP Corporate Development, EDB
Hannah Park, Chief Product Officer, Planned Parenthood
Joe Futty, CPO & CTO, Pipedrive
Jonathan Shottan, Chief Product Officer, Tonal
Kimberly Bloomston, CPO, 6sense
Kousthub Raghavan, Chief Product & Digital Officer, CLEAR
Natalia Williams, Chief Product Officer, Qonto
Nikita Miller, Chief Product Officer, Perk
Nilesh Khandelwal, Chief Product Officer, Rakuten Rewards
Paul Burke, CPO, Reveleer
Randhir Vieira, CPO, formerly Healthify
Renn Turiano, CPO, Gannett – USA Today Network
Sarah Turrin, CPO, Color
Emerging: On an amazing trajectory, regardless of tenure.
Adam Kelsey, EVP, Product Management, SignalWire
Apurva Garware, SVP, Head of Product, Invisible Technologies
Chai Atreya, Chief Product Officer, ActiveCampaign
Jack Brody, Chief Product Officer, Suno
John Barrus, VP of Product Management, Niobium
Kevin Swint, former Co-Founder & CPO, RemixAI
Nirmal Kumar, CPO, Aliaswire
Rafael Flores, Chief Product Officer, Treasure Data.ai
Sarah Jacob Singh, CPO & CTO, Medbridge
Sarosh Waghmar, CPO & Co-Founder, Spotnana
Vanessa Davis, CPO, LegalOn
Vikas Seth, CPO, ARIS
Platform: Multiplying impact beyond their own product by leveraging the ecosystem at scale.
Arnab Bose, CPO, Asana
Kishan Chetan, EVP & GM, Agentforce Service Cloud, Salesforce
Shardul Vikram, Chief Product Officer, SAP Application AI, SAP
Tom Occhino, Chief Product Officer, Vercel
Rohit Badlaney, CPO & General Manager, IBM Cloud Platform, IBM
Terre Layton, former CPO, BetterHealth
B.J. Boyle, Chief Product Officer, MacroHealth
Winners were selected by an Independent Advisory Council of seasoned product executives based on impact and leadership.
ABOUT PRODUCTS THAT COUNT
Products That Count is the world’s largest nonprofit community, engaging 600,000+ product managers and Chief Product Officers (CPOs) united by a mission: to empower everyone to build products that truly count. In a world flooded with products, only a few ignite passion, deliver value at scale, and transform lives. Behind those exceptional products are visionary CPOs and high-performing product teams driving innovation at the most bleeding-edge companies. We recognize these trailblazers through our coveted Awards, accelerate careers from PM to the C-suite and beyond through daily best practices, and serve as the trusted advisor to nearly all Fortune 1000 CPOs. Our Corporate Alliance includes Walmart, Ford, Cisco, Johnson & Johnson, Amplitude, and more. The most admired product leaders across industries serve on our Advisory Council, guiding the future of product leadership. Together, we’re shaping a future where every product counts. Learn more at productsthatcount.org
ABOUT MIGHTY CAPITAL
Mighty Capital is the VC firm that leverages the Product Alpha Effect, a data-backed framework for outperformance that proves great products drive great businesses. Founded in 2018 by SC Moatti, a product visionary and former Meta product leader, and Jennifer Vancini, a veteran of tech investing and M&A, we bring a differentiated edge to venture. Through Moatti’s 600,000-strong Products That Count network of product leaders, we see where the world is going before others do. That proprietary signal gives us an advantage in sourcing, diligence, and post-investment value creation. Our portfolio speaks for itself: 1 in 5 companies is a category leader like Amplitude (NASDAQ:AMPL), Groq, and Netskope (NASDAQ:NTSK). Founders consistently call us the most value-add investor on their cap table, and use our global product ecosystem as a marketplace to accelerate time to revenue, scale, and exit. Anchored by GCM Grosvenor, we’re deploying Fund III with both prior funds in top decile DPI and TVPI, more than $20B in value created, and 6 IPOs to date. Learn more at Mighty.Capital.
Media Contact
Emma Shirlin, Products That Count, 1 8287020154, emmashirlin@productsthatcount.com
View original content:https://www.prweb.com/releases/products-that-count-announces-the-winners-of-the-2026-cpo-awards-honoring-the-product-leaders-redefining-their-craft-in-the-ai-era-302759934.html
SOURCE Products That Count
BillionToOne Launches Unity Confirm™: A category-defining test that bridges the gap between screening and invasive diagnostics
2026 Brockton High School Film Festival
Products That Count Announces the Winners of the 2026 CPO Awards, Honoring the Product Leaders Redefining Their Craft in the AI Era
Send Rakhi to UK swiftly with UK Gifts Portal
Whiteboard Series with NEAR | Ep: 45 Joel Thorstensson from ceramic.network
New Gooseneck Omni Antennas Offer Enhanced Signals in a Durable Package
Why You Should Build on #NEAR – Co-founder Illia Polosukhin at CV Labs
Whiteboard Series with NEAR | Ep: 45 Joel Thorstensson from ceramic.network
NEAR End of Year Town Hall 2021: The Open Web World, MetaBUILD 2 Hackathon and 2021 recap
Trending
-
Coin Market5 days ago
88 people charged over 12 crypto wrench attacks in France
-
Coin Market4 days agoPrice predictions 4/27: SPX, DXY, BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, SOL, DOGE, HYPE, ADA
-
Technology5 days agoStraits Financial Services Pte Ltd Granted Overseas Intermediary Futures Broker Status by Shanghai Futures Exchange and Guangzhou Futures Exchange
-
Technology5 days agoiMarketKorea Signs Two MOUs with Vietnam’s Phu Tho Provincial People’s Committee and BIDV
-
Technology5 days agoOMODA 4 Officially Rolls Off the Production Line: OMODA&JAECOO Sets Its Sights on a New Global Million-Unit Target
-
Technology5 days agoTeamViewer Advances Toward Autonomous Endpoint Management: Tia Now Generates Automations From Customers’ Own Proven Fixes
-
Technology5 days agoPlug and Play partners with the Nigerian Institution of Marine Engineers and Naval Architects to elevate Nigeria’s maritime ecosystem
-
Coin Market5 days ago
Western Union eyes May for its stablecoin USDPT rollout
