Connect with us

Technology

Proper Mechanical Commissioning Cuts Whole-Building Energy Use by a Median of 13%, JDI Industrial Services Analysis Finds

Published

on

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory studied 643 U.S. commercial buildings and found that structured commissioning during new construction pays for itself in under five years. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), U.S. Department of Energy — 2009

WESTMINSTER, S.C., June 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — JDI Industrial Services has released an analysis of federal and industry research examining one of the most persistent challenges in industrial and commercial construction: integrating new mechanical systems with existing facility infrastructure during turn-key projects.

Drawing on studies from the U.S. Department of Energy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), and construction-industry research organizations, the analysis finds that coordination failures and poor system integration create billions of dollars in avoidable costs each year. At the same time, structured commissioning and controls optimization consistently deliver measurable returns through reduced energy consumption, lower rework costs, and improved operational performance.

The findings reveal a striking imbalance between the cost of integration failures and the cost of preventing them. According to the 2018 FMI Corporation and Autodesk Construction Disconnected Report, poor project data and communication account for 52% of all construction rework, resulting in approximately $31.3 billion in rework costs across the U.S. construction industry. The same report estimates that construction professionals spend roughly 35% of their working time, more than 14 hours per week, on non-productive activities such as searching for information, resolving conflicts, and correcting avoidable errors.

For facility owners undertaking turn-key mechanical projects, the implications extend far beyond construction schedules. Mechanical systems operate at the intersection of process requirements, building infrastructure, controls networks, utility services, and safety systems. When integration planning is incomplete, the resulting failures often emerge after equipment installation, when correction costs are highest and operational disruptions become unavoidable.

Mechanical Integration Failures Create Costs Before Systems Go Online

Mechanical integration problems rarely begin with equipment installation. Most originate during project planning, when incomplete documentation, poor coordination among trades, or insufficient understanding of existing facility conditions introduce risks that remain hidden until commissioning or startup.

According to the FMI Corporation and Autodesk Construction Disconnected Report (2018), construction workers spend approximately 35% of their time on non-productive activities, representing an estimated $177.5 billion in annual labor costs across the U.S. construction industry. Much of that lost time stems from locating project information, resolving conflicts between disciplines, and addressing work that must be corrected because of coordination failures.

For mechanical contractors, integration challenges often involve mismatches between new equipment and existing infrastructure. Electrical loads may differ from documented conditions. Building automation systems may require communication protocols that were not identified during design. Existing utility systems may have less available capacity than anticipated. Structural, process, and mechanical requirements may compete for the same physical space.

The analysis finds that these issues frequently appear during late-stage construction because integration planning is treated as a documentation exercise rather than a system-performance exercise. By the time problems become visible in the field, schedule pressure often encourages temporary workarounds rather than permanent solutions.

Industry research suggests that this approach creates a compounding cost effect. Every unresolved integration issue increases the likelihood of downstream rework, startup delays, performance deficiencies, and operational inefficiencies that persist long after construction is complete.

Rework Remains One of the Highest Hidden Costs in Construction

Available research indicates that the financial impact of rework remains significantly underestimated. According to data cited by Autodesk from the Navigant Construction Forum, direct rework costs typically account for between 4% and 6% of total project value. When indirect impacts such as schedule delays, management overhead, productivity losses, and operational disruptions are included, the figure approaches 9% of total project cost.

For a facility modernization project valued at $10 million, indirect and direct rework costs can represent hundreds of thousands of dollars in avoidable expenditures. Mechanical integration failures often contribute disproportionately because they affect interconnected systems rather than isolated components.

A misconfigured control sequence, for example, may require mechanical, electrical, automation, and operational teams to revisit completed work. A poorly coordinated equipment replacement can trigger modifications across multiple disciplines. What appears initially as a localized issue frequently expands into a project-wide coordination challenge.

The analysis concludes that successful turn-key construction depends less on equipment selection and more on the ability to coordinate mechanical systems within the broader operational environment of the facility.

According to a 2018 study by FMI and Autodesk, poor communication and data management are significant drivers of inefficiency in the construction industry. Rework attributable to these issues accounts for 52% of total rework, translating to an annual cost impact of $31.3 billion across the United States. The same study found that non-productive labor consumes 35% of all work hours, representing an annual labor impact of $177.5 billion. Complementing these findings, the Navigant Construction Forum estimates that direct rework costs alone account for 4 to 6% of total project cost, with the broader impact climbing to approximately 9% of project cost once indirect costs are factored in (Navigant Construction Forum; FMI / Autodesk, 2018).

Commissioning Delivers Measurable Performance Improvements

While construction-industry research highlights the cost of integration failures, federal research demonstrates that structured commissioning provides a reliable method for reducing those risks.

A landmark Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study published for the U.S. Department of Energy examined 643 commercial buildings across the United States and found that commissioning new-construction facilities produced median whole-building energy savings of 13%. The same study found a median payback period of 4.2 years.

The significance of these findings extends beyond energy efficiency. Commissioning serves as a verification process that confirms systems operate according to design intent while functioning properly within the facility’s existing infrastructure.

During commissioning, project teams validate equipment performance, controls integration, sequence-of-operations logic, system interactions, and operational readiness. Problems that might otherwise remain hidden until occupancy are identified and corrected before they become operational liabilities.

The LBNL analysis also found that commissioning costs represented a relatively small portion of overall project value compared with the performance benefits achieved. This finding reinforces the conclusion that commissioning functions primarily as a risk-reduction investment rather than a project expense.

For facility managers evaluating turn-key projects, commissioning represents one of the few integration safeguards with extensive federal performance data supporting its effectiveness.

Existing Facilities Often Achieve Greater Savings

Integration challenges are not limited to new construction. Existing facilities frequently experience performance degradation as building systems evolve over time through renovations, equipment replacements, and operational changes.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s 2013 analysis of existing-building commissioning found median whole-building energy savings of 16%, with savings ranging from 10% to 30%. Notably, approximately 25% of buildings studied achieved energy reductions exceeding 30%. These results suggest that many facilities operate with significant inefficiencies created by integration issues that accumulate gradually and remain undetected during normal operations.

Mechanical systems may continue functioning while operating outside optimal performance parameters. Controls may no longer reflect current occupancy patterns. Equipment schedules may conflict with actual operational requirements. Sensors may provide inaccurate information to automation systems. Because these deficiencies often develop incrementally, they can remain unnoticed for years while increasing operating costs and reducing system reliability.

The analysis finds that commissioning provides a structured process for identifying and correcting these hidden integration failures before they generate larger maintenance or replacement costs.

Building Automation and Retuning Extend Integration Benefits

Mechanical system integration does not end when construction is completed. Long-term performance depends on the ongoing alignment between equipment operation, facility requirements, and building automation systems.

According to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory research conducted through the U.S. Department of Energy’s building retuning program, facilities that optimize controls and correct integration faults typically achieve energy savings ranging from 5% to 25%.

The program reports average energy-cost savings of approximately $0.185 per square foot annually, with simple payback periods ranging from 0.3 to 3.5 years. These findings illustrate the importance of viewing integration as a lifecycle process rather than a construction milestone. Mechanical systems operate within dynamic environments where occupancy patterns, production requirements, utility costs, and operational priorities continually evolve.

Facilities that maintain alignment between automation systems and operational needs tend to preserve performance gains achieved during commissioning. Facilities that neglect optimization frequently experience gradual declines in efficiency and reliability.

The analysis concludes that integration planning should extend beyond project turnover to include long-term performance verification and controls management.

Commissioning Costs Remain a Fraction of Potential Losses

One reason organizations defer commissioning is the perception that it adds unnecessary project costs. Federal research suggests otherwise.

According to research conducted by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the Building Commissioning Association, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Building Technologies Office, the median commissioning cost for new construction projects declined to approximately $0.82 per square foot by 2018. That figure represents roughly 0.25% of the total construction cost.

When compared against potential rework expenses, operational inefficiencies, startup delays, and energy waste, commissioning costs remain comparatively small. The available evidence indicates that the financial consequences of inadequate integration substantially exceed the cost of implementing structured verification processes.

For facility engineers and project managers, the question therefore shifts from whether commissioning is affordable to whether the risks of skipping commissioning are acceptable.

Methodology

JDI Industrial Services synthesized publicly available findings from the FMI Corporation and Autodesk Construction Disconnected Report (2018), the Navigant Construction Forum as referenced by Autodesk’s 2024 construction-industry statistics analysis, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Building Commissioning: A Golden Opportunity for Reducing Energy Costs and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions (2009, reaffirmed by the U.S. Department of Energy in 2018), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s 2013 existing-building commissioning research, and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Building Re-Tuning program. No proprietary survey or original research was conducted. All statistics were drawn from named third-party sources and reflect publicly available information current through June 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does “seamless integration” mean in a turn-key mechanical project?

Seamless integration refers to the successful coordination of new mechanical systems with a facility’s existing infrastructure, utilities, controls, operational processes, and physical constraints. Integration extends beyond equipment installation and includes ensuring that HVAC systems, piping networks, automation controls, electrical systems, safety systems, and operational requirements function together as intended. Federal commissioning studies involving 643 commercial buildings found that projects using structured verification processes achieved median whole-building energy savings of 13%, demonstrating the measurable value of coordinated system integration.

Why do mechanical integration problems show up so often during turn-key construction?

Mechanical integration problems frequently emerge because existing facility conditions differ from assumptions made during planning and design. Construction-industry research from FMI and Autodesk found that 52% of rework originates from poor communication and project data issues. When documentation is incomplete or coordination among disciplines is insufficient, conflicts often remain hidden until installation, testing, or startup reveals them.

What should a turn-key contractor do before construction begins to protect existing systems?

Turn-key contractors should conduct detailed site investigations, verify existing conditions, document utility capacities, review automation-system requirements, identify operational constraints, and establish coordination procedures before construction begins. Early verification reduces the likelihood of downstream rework, which industry research estimates can account for 4% to 6% of project cost directly and approximately 9% when including indirect impacts.

What role does commissioning play in mechanical system integration?

Commissioning functions as the formal verification process that confirms mechanical systems operate according to design intent and integrate properly with existing facility infrastructure. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory research found that commissioning new construction projects produced median energy savings of 13% and achieved a median payback period of 4.2 years. Commissioning identifies performance deficiencies before they become operational problems and provides documented validation that systems are functioning correctly.

What questions should facility managers ask a turn-key contractor about integration before signing a contract?

Facility managers should ask contractors how they will verify existing conditions, how they will test control integration, how they will minimize operational disruptions, what commissioning procedures they will use, and how they will validate system performance after installation. Building owners should also request documentation regarding startup procedures, controls optimization, and long-term performance verification. Federal research indicates that structured commissioning and re-tuning programs can deliver energy savings ranging from 5% to 25%, making verification procedures an important indicator of project quality.

About JDI Industrial Services

JDI Industrial Services is a Westminster, South Carolina-based industrial mechanical contractor founded in 1997. The company provides turn-key mechanical construction, maintenance, installation, and industrial services for facility engineers, plant managers, and industrial operators throughout the Southeast. More information is available at https://jdiindustrial.com/service-types/mechanical-contractor/.

Media Contact

Contact: Kevin Nealey
Email: keviCheckn.nealey@jdiindustrial.com
Location: Westminster, SC

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/proper-mechanical-commissioning-cuts-whole-building-energy-use-by-a-median-of-13-jdi-industrial-services-analysis-finds-302811092.html

Continue Reading

Technology

Axon Announces Body 5: Next-Generation Camera Built for the AI Era

Published

on

By

Axon Body 5 delivers 25x the AI processing power of earlier-generation cameras, with upgraded connectivity, audio and battery life to support real-time situational awareness in the field

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz., Oct. 24, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Axon (Nasdaq: AXON), the global leader in public safety technology, today announced Axon Body 5, its newest body-worn camera designed to bring more powerful intelligence, connectivity and real-time support directly to officers in the field.

For years, Axon body cameras have helped agencies capture critical evidence and create greater transparency. Body 5 is built to help officers during the call, with information, assistance and backup on the spot.

“Officers shouldn’t have to choose between getting information and watching the scene. With Axon Body 5, they don’t,” said Rick Smith, Axon Founder and CEO. “They capture a license or document with the camera, keep their hands free and eyes up, and get information faster than writing it down and calling it in by radio. An officer fully engaged with the person in front of them, not down at a notepad, is a safer officer and a better-served community.”

Axon Body 5: Built for the AI Era

Built from the ground up for the AI era, Axon Body 5 delivers 25x the AI processing power than earlier generation Axon body cameras, alongside advancements in connectivity, audio, video and battery life. Together, these upgrades give the camera the physical power to run smarter AI features — both today and as new AI tools are developed in the future — while also making it more dependable for officers to use every day. 

For the first time, Axon is also introducing two versions of its latest flagship camera: Axon Body 5 and Axon Body 5 Pro.

Both models feature several key advancements, including:

25x more processing power for AI: A powerful new computing architecture creates the capacity to support current and future AI features directly on the body camera.Enhanced video: Improved video captures clearer evidence across challenging environments, including better low-light performance.Improved connectivity: Seamless connectivity in urban and remote environments – and more precise location capability – helps officers, cameras and remote support teams stay connected when timely information matters most.Longer battery life: 20% more battery life than the previous generation helps keep the camera ready and connected throughout an officer’s shift.

The Axon Body 5 Pro will continue to gain new AI capabilities as they become available, growing along with the AI Era Plan. Additionally, new hardware features include:

A near-focus camera: An additional dedicated camera lens lets officers scan driver’s licenses to check status and search for wants or warrants in seconds, without returning to the patrol vehicle, with relevant information sent to Axon Fusus to support real-time operations.Front-facing speakers: Four additional speakers project even more powerful audio toward the person an officer is speaking with, helping real-time translations from Axon Assistant carry more clearly over heavy traffic or crowd noise. Additional memory: Extra space lets the camera run several AI tools at once, helping officers stay better informed and work faster.

Bringing More of Axon’s AI Era Into the Field

Axon Body 5 helps officers get more out of the Axon AI Era Plan by bringing smart tools right to the scene. Axon’s portfolio already supports public safety professionals across a growing range of tasks. For example, Draft One helps officers turn body-camera audio into high-quality report drafts and Axon Assistant provides voice-based information access and real-time translation.

Increasingly, Axon is also bringing AI into real-time operations.

Axon Guardian is a new category of AI features within the AI Era Plan that was specifically created to work with an officer’s field-based devices – starting with body cameras and in-car cameras – to improve safety. Guardian is designed to flag potential risks as situations unfold and create alerts when additional attention may be needed. Two of the first features include:

Escalation Detection: When an Axon Body 4 or Axon Body 5 camera is activated and recording, Guardian has the ability to detect potential conflicts in real time and create an alert in Axon Fusus. A human reviews the livestream and decides if additional support or action is needed.Approach Alert: When active on Axon Fleet 3, Guardian can detect if the door of a stopped vehicle opens and alert the officer through the in-car display and their body-worn camera.

Combined, Axon Body 5 and the expanding AI Era portfolio demonstrate the importance of AI as a critical resource to assist public safety professionals before, during and after an incident — reducing administrative burden, improving situational awareness and helping protect more lives.

Innovating Responsibly

Axon’s Responsible Innovation framework guides the development of all of its products. Designed with this in mind, Axon Body 5 and Guardian prioritize human oversight and maintain agency control over data. As a key part of the responsible innovation process, Axon’s independent Ethics and Equity Advisory Council was created to help responsibly develop and deploy new technologies with transparency, while aligning with community expectations.

General availability dates for Axon Body 5 and Axon Guardian will be announced soon. Product features and capabilities vary by configuration. For more information on Axon’s current products and services: Axon Product Catalog – Axon.com.

About Axon
Axon (Nasdaq: AXON) is the global leader in public safety technology supporting state, local, federal and international public safety agencies with technology designed to Protect Life. Complementing its mission, Axon’s growing Enterprise market focuses on protecting critical infrastructure and frontline workers across multiple industries including corporate security, hospitality, retail and healthcare. Founder-led since 1993, Axon builds products with transparency and responsibility. From TASER energy devices to today’s connected network of hardware – including cameras, drones, and robotics – cloud software, sensors, and AI-tools, the Axon ecosystem helps seamlessly protect people and places when it matters most. To ensure these technologies align with community expectations, Axon’s independent Ethics & Equity Advisory Council guides the ethical, inclusive, and accountable design of its products and services. Learn more about the EEAC and Axon’s Responsible Innovation framework at Axon Responsibility. 

Non-Axon trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Axon, TASER and the Delta Logo are trademarks of Axon Enterprise, Inc., some of which are registered in the US and other countries. For more information, visit www.axon.com/legal. All rights reserved.

Please visit https://investor.axon.com and https://www.axon.com/newsroom for more information.

Media Contact:
Kate MacKinnon
Vice President, Communications
press@axon.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/axon-announces-body-5-next-generation-camera-built-for-the-ai-era-302918553.html

SOURCE Axon

Continue Reading

Technology

In HelloNation, Custom Fabrication Expert Mark Coyle Explains a Common Mistake in Custom Aluminum Design

Published

on

By

The article explains why smart geometry, not thicker walls, creates stronger, more efficient aluminum components.

ROCHESTER, N.Y., Oct. 24, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — What early design choice causes many custom aluminum projects to become heavier, costlier, or harder to manufacture? That question is addressed in a HelloNation article featuring insights from Custom Fabrication Expert Mark Coyle of American Custom Metals, Inc. in Rochester, New York, that outlines how misunderstanding aluminum behavior leads designers to rely on thick walls instead of stronger geometry.

The article begins by explaining that many people assume thicker walls automatically make aluminum parts stronger. It notes that aluminum does not respond to wall thickness the way steel does. Instead, its performance is shaped by how the metal flows through the extrusion die. The article states that custom aluminum design is more effective when profiles use ribs, chambers, and flanges to create stiffness without adding unnecessary weight. This guidance helps readers understand why adding material often increases cost without improving strength.

The article also highlights that thicker walls change how aluminum moves during extrusion. When heavy areas fill more slowly, the metal cools unevenly and can develop stress that only appears later. The HelloNation piece explains that well-balanced geometry keeps extrusion smooth and predictable. This consistency makes it easier to maintain dimensional accuracy across long production runs. By focusing on geometry, custom aluminum design avoids the problems that come with slow extrusion speeds and uneven cooling.

Another insight in the article centers on how ribs and internal supports influence stability. It describes how a thin wall supported by a properly placed rib often performs better than a thick wall with no reinforcement. This happens because the rib helps distribute load, improve stiffness, and guide the aluminum as it cools. The article explains that this structural approach makes custom aluminum design more efficient and gives designers more control over how the final part behaves under pressure.

The article also shows why early collaboration between designer and fabricator prevents costly changes. It states that a fabricator familiar with extrusion can catch potential issues before a die is built. Small adjustments to corners or transitions can remove weak points or improve metal flow. The article notes that this teamwork keeps the design aligned with real-world production. By working together early, both sides reduce the risk of redesigning the die after the first test run.

Machining is another area where the article explains how wall thickness affects performance. Features such as deep pockets or sharp internal angles may require slow feed rates or special tooling. When walls are thicker than needed, those areas can become difficult to machine cleanly. The article states that thoughtful custom aluminum design makes machining more predictable. Small changes, such as adding radiused edges or sizing features to match standard tools, help shorten cycle times and prevent tool wear.

Thermal behavior receives detailed attention as well. The article explains that aluminum retains heat differently depending on the mass of each section. Thicker walls hold heat longer, which increases the chance of distortion during extrusion, machining, or finishing. When a design uses geometry to create strength, the material cools more evenly. This reduces warping and helps long profiles stay aligned. The article notes that stable cooling is important for components that require a precise fit and consistent shape throughout an entire production run.

Cost is also a key topic in the article. It states that heavier profiles increase material use, extrusion time, and tooling needs. A custom aluminum design that relies on geometry instead of mass lowers material consumption and keeps the fabrication process efficient. The article explains that lighter parts are easier to handle, ship, and assemble. This saves money across multiple stages of production and supports long-term manufacturing efficiency.

The article also notes that smart custom aluminum design creates profiles that behave predictably during extrusion and machining. Smooth transitions, balanced wall dimensions, and structural features help reduce the chance of distortion or dimensional drift. These elements also lower scrap rates and support reliable performance. By using geometry instead of excess material, designers build parts that maintain strength without compromising manufacturability.

As the article concludes, it emphasizes that avoiding thick walls is one of the best ways to improve performance and lower cost. It states that the most dependable custom aluminum components come from designs that use structural features to strengthen the profile. When designers understand how aluminum behaves at each stage of extrusion and machining, they create parts that are strong, efficient, and consistent from batch to batch. This approach turns custom aluminum design into a predictable process rather than a series of uncertain adjustments.

A Common Mistake in Custom Aluminum Design features insights from Mark Coyle, Custom Fabrication Expert of Rochester, NY, in HelloNation.

About HelloNation
HelloNation is America’s Good News Network, a premier media platform built on the idea that good news travels faster when real people tell real stories. Through its community-focused publications and innovative “edvertising” approach, HelloNation delivers content that informs, inspires, and spotlights the leaders making a meaningful impact in their communities.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/in-hellonation-custom-fabrication-expert-mark-coyle-explains-a-common-mistake-in-custom-aluminum-design-302918282.html

SOURCE HelloNation

Continue Reading

Technology

World Young Scientist Summit 2026 Opens in Wenzhou, Zhejiang

Published

on

By

WENZHOU, China, Oct. 24, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — This is a report by China Daily:

On October 24, the World Young Scientist Summit 2026 opened in Wenzhou, Zhejiang. The event is hosted by the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST), the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Government, and the World Association of Young Scientists. Nearly 800 representatives, including scientists, educators, and entrepreneurs from more than 60 countries and regions, are attending the summit.

He Junke, Vice President of CAST in charge of daily work and First Secretary of its Secretariat; Lian Yimin, Chairman and Party Group Secretary of the Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference; Marcelo Knobel, Executive Director of The World Academy of Sciences; and Zhang Zhenfeng, Member of the Standing Committee of the CPC Zhejiang Provincial Committee and Secretary of the CPC Wenzhou Municipal Committee, attended the summit and delivered remarks. Yao Gaoyuan, Vice Governor of the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Government, presided over the first segment of the plenary session.

With the theme “Gathering Talents Worldwide to Create a Better Future,” the summit’s annual agenda is “Global Youth Action in the AI Era: Building a Sustainable Future.” It aims to draw on the insights of young people around the world, deepen international sci-tech cooperation, and jointly address questions about young people, science, the world and the future.

Efim Zelmanov, Fields Medalist and Foreign Member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chen Yunji, Deputy Director of the Institute of Computing Technology, CAS, and Director of the National Key Laboratory of Processor Chips; Mary Garson, President of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry; and Lu Chaoyang, Member of the Standing Committee of CAST, Executive Dean of the Shanghai Institute of Advanced Study, University of Science and Technology of China, and Chairman of the Council of the World Association of Young Scientists, delivered keynote speeches respectively on education reform in the AI era, AI and processor chips, young women scientists’ participation in science, and quantum computing. They explored new opportunities for scientific research, talent cultivation, and international cooperation in the AI era.

This year’s summit placed greater emphasis on the growth needs of young scientists, with young talents under the age of 45 accounting for 88 percent of participants. It aimed to build a cluster of international journals, bring together young scientific talent, facilitate a batch of international collaborative projects and advance the application and commercialization of scientific and technological achievements. The summit released the Report on the Distribution and Mobility of Young Scientists in the Field of Embodied Intelligence, launched the World Young Scientist Summit Partner Journal Program and the 2026 World Young Scientist Innovation and Entrepreneurship Growth Support Program. It also published the “Young Scientist Pioneers 2035” list and announced the 2026 Sustainable Development Young Scientist Award. The awards were presented to four Chinese and foreign scientists.

Chen Tianrun, Founder of Hangzhou Moxin Technology Co., Ltd.; Yuan Yang, Assistant to the Dean of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences at Tsinghua University; and two of the 2026 Sustainable Development Young Scientist Award winners, César de la Fuente and Nicola Segata, among other Chinese and foreign young scientist representatives, spoke at the flash-talk session to share their research practices and reflections.

In addition, the conference focused on fields such as future manufacturing, quantum information, embodied intelligence, brain-computer intelligence, environmental science, deep-sea resources, and life and health, and held 12 parallel forums. It also included the “Gravitation π” Future Technology and Concept Products Exhibition and Exchange, local thematic side events, and sci-tech and humanities study visits, further building an interdisciplinary, cross-regional and cross-sector platform for youth sci-tech exchange and cooperation.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/world-young-scientist-summit-2026-opens-in-wenzhou-zhejiang-302918664.html

SOURCE China Daily

Continue Reading

Trending