Technology

BGC Group Updates its Outlook for the Fourth Quarter of 2024

Published

1 year ago

December 31, 2024

NEW YORK, Dec. 31, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — BGC Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: BGC), today announced that it has updated its outlook for the quarter ending December 31, 2024.

Updated Outlook
BGC reaffirmed its previously stated outlook ranges for revenue and pre-tax Adjusted Earnings for the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s outlook was contained in BGC’s financial results press release issued on October 31, 2024, which can be found at http://ir.bgcg.com.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The non-GAAP definitions below include references to certain equity-based compensation instruments, such as restricted stock awards and/or restricted stock units (“RSUs”), that the Company has issued and outstanding following its corporate conversion on July 1, 2023. Although BGC is retaining certain defined terms and references, including references to partnerships or partnership units, for purposes of comparability before and after the corporate conversion, such references may not be applicable following the period ended June 30, 2023.

This document contains non-GAAP financial measures that differ from the most directly comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Non-GAAP financial measures used by the Company include “Adjusted Earnings before noncontrolling interests and taxes”, which is used interchangeably with “pre-tax Adjusted Earnings”; “Post-tax Adjusted Earnings to fully diluted shareholders”, which is used interchangeably with “post-tax Adjusted Earnings”; “Adjusted EBITDA”; “Liquidity”; and “Constant Currency”. The definitions of these terms are below.

Adjusted Earnings Defined
BGC uses non-GAAP financial measures, including “Adjusted Earnings before noncontrolling interests and taxes” and “Post-tax Adjusted Earnings to fully diluted shareholders”, which are supplemental measures of operating results used by management to evaluate the financial performance of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. BGC believes that Adjusted Earnings best reflect the operating earnings generated by the Company on a consolidated basis and are the earnings which management considers when managing its business.

As compared with “Income (loss) from operations before income taxes” and “Net income (loss) for fully diluted shares”, both prepared in accordance with GAAP, Adjusted Earnings calculations primarily exclude certain non-cash items and other expenses that generally do not involve the receipt or outlay of cash by the Company and/or which do not dilute existing stockholders. In addition, Adjusted Earnings calculations exclude certain gains and charges that management believes do not best reflect the underlying operating performance of BGC. Adjusted Earnings is calculated by taking the most comparable GAAP measures and adjusting for certain items with respect to compensation expenses, non-compensation expenses, and other income, as discussed below.

Calculations of Compensation Adjustments for Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA

Treatment of Equity-Based Compensation Line Item for Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA
The Company’s Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA measures exclude all GAAP charges included in the line item “Equity-based compensation and allocations of net income to limited partnership units and FPUs” (or “equity-based compensation” for purposes of defining the Company’s non-GAAP results) as recorded on the Company’s GAAP Consolidated Statements of Operations and GAAP Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. These GAAP equity-based compensation charges reflect the following items:

Charges related to amortization of RSUs, restricted stock awards, other equity-based awards, and limited partnership units;Charges with respect to grants of exchangeability, which reflect the right of holders of limited partnership units with no capital accounts, such as LPUs and PSUs, to exchange these units into shares of common stock, or into partnership units with capital accounts, such as HDUs, as well as cash paid with respect to taxes withheld or expected to be owed by the unit holder upon such exchange. The withholding taxes related to the exchange of certain non-exchangeable units without a capital account into either common shares or units with a capital account may be funded by the redemption of preferred units such as PPSUs;Charges with respect to preferred units and RSU tax accounts. Any preferred units and RSU tax accounts would not be included in the Company’s fully diluted share count because they cannot be made exchangeable into shares of common stock and are entitled only to a fixed distribution or dividend. Preferred units are granted in connection with the grant of certain limited partnership units that may be granted exchangeability or redeemed in connection with the grant of shares of common stock, and RSU tax accounts are granted in connection with the grant of RSUs. The preferred units and RSU tax accounts are granted at ratios designed to cover any withholding taxes expected to be paid. This is an alternative to the common practice among public companies of issuing the gross amount of shares to employees, subject to cashless withholding of shares, to pay applicable withholding taxes;GAAP equity-based compensation charges with respect to the grant of an offsetting amount of common stock or partnership units with capital accounts in connection with the redemption of non-exchangeable units, including PSUs and LPUs;Charges related to grants of equity awards, including common stock, RSUs, restricted stock awards or partnership units with capital accounts;Allocations of net income to limited partnership units and FPUs. Such allocations represent the pro-rata portion of post-tax GAAP earnings available to such unit holders; andCharges related to dividend equivalents earned on RSUs and any preferred returns on RSU tax accounts.

The amounts of certain quarterly equity-based compensation charges are based upon the Company’s estimate of such expected charges during the annual period, as described further below under “Methodology for Calculating Adjusted Earnings Taxes.”

Virtually all of BGC’s key executives and producers have equity stakes in the Company and its subsidiaries and generally receive deferred equity as part of their compensation. A significant percentage of BGC’s fully diluted shares are owned by its executives, partners and employees. The Company issues RSUs, restricted stock, limited partnership units (prior to July 1, 2023) as well as other forms of equity-based compensation, including grants of exchangeability into shares of common stock (prior to July 1, 2023), to provide liquidity to its employees, to align the interests of its employees and management with those of common stockholders, to help motivate and retain key employees, and to encourage a collaborative culture that drives cross-selling and revenue growth.

All share equivalents that are part of the Company’s equity-based compensation program, including REUs, PSUs, LPUs, HDUs, and other units that may be made exchangeable into common stock, as well as RSUs (which are recorded using the treasury stock method), are included in the fully diluted share count when issued or at the beginning of the subsequent quarter after the date of grant.

Compensation charges are also adjusted for certain other cash and non-cash items.

Certain Other Compensation-Related Adjustments for Adjusted Earnings
BGC also excludes various other GAAP items that management views as not reflective of the Company’s underlying performance in a given period from its calculation of Adjusted Earnings. These may include compensation-related items with respect to cost-saving initiatives, such as severance charges incurred in connection with headcount reductions as part of broad restructuring and/or cost savings plans.

Calculation of Non-Compensation Adjustments for Adjusted Earnings
Adjusted Earnings calculations may also exclude items such as:

Non-cash GAAP charges related to the amortization of intangibles with respect to acquisitions;Acquisition related costs;Non-cash GAAP asset impairment charges;Resolutions of litigation, disputes, investigations, or enforcement matters that are generally non-recurring, exceptional, or unusual, or similar items that management believes do not best reflect BGC’s underlying operating performance, including related unaffiliated third-party professional fees and expenses; andVarious other GAAP items that management views as not reflective of the Company’s underlying performance in a given period, including non-compensation-related charges incurred as part of broad restructuring and/or cost savings plans. Such GAAP items may include charges for professional fees and expenses, exiting leases and/or other long-term contracts as part of cost-saving initiatives, as well as non-cash impairment charges related to assets, goodwill and/or intangible assets created from acquisitions.

Calculation of Adjustments for Other (income) losses for Adjusted Earnings
Adjusted Earnings calculations also exclude gains from litigation resolution and certain other non-cash, non-dilutive, and/or non-economic items, which may, in some periods, include:

Gains or losses on divestitures;Fair value adjustment of investments;Certain other GAAP items, including gains or losses related to BGC’s investments accounted for under the equity method; andAny unusual, non-ordinary, or non-recurring gains or losses.

Methodology for Calculating Adjusted Earnings Taxes
Although Adjusted Earnings are calculated on a pre-tax basis, BGC also reports post-tax Adjusted Earnings to fully diluted shareholders. The Company defines post-tax Adjusted Earnings to fully diluted shareholders as pre-tax Adjusted Earnings reduced by the non-GAAP tax provision described below and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest for Adjusted Earnings.

The Company calculates its tax provision for post-tax Adjusted Earnings using an annual estimate similar to how it accounts for its income tax provision under GAAP. To calculate the quarterly tax provision under GAAP, BGC estimates its full fiscal year GAAP income (loss) from operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and the expected inclusions and deductions for income tax purposes, including expected equity-based compensation during the annual period. The resulting annualized tax rate is applied to BGC’s quarterly GAAP income (loss) from operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries. At the end of the annual period, the Company updates its estimate to reflect the actual tax amounts owed for the period.

To determine the non-GAAP tax provision, BGC first adjusts pre-tax Adjusted Earnings by recognizing any, and only, amounts for which a tax deduction applies under applicable law. The amounts include charges with respect to equity-based compensation; certain charges related to employee loan forgiveness; certain net operating loss carryforwards when taken for statutory purposes; and certain charges related to tax goodwill amortization. These adjustments may also reflect timing and measurement differences, including treatment of employee loans; changes in the value of units between the dates of grants of exchangeability and the date of actual unit exchange; changes in the value of RSUs and/or restricted stock awards between the date of grant and the date the award vests; variations in the value of certain deferred tax assets; and liabilities and the different timing of permitted deductions for tax under GAAP and statutory tax requirements.

After application of these adjustments, the result is the Company’s taxable income for its pre-tax Adjusted Earnings, to which BGC then applies the statutory tax rates to determine its non-GAAP tax provision. BGC views the effective tax rate on pre-tax Adjusted Earnings as equal to the amount of its non-GAAP tax provision divided by the amount of pre-tax Adjusted Earnings. Generally, the most significant factor affecting this non-GAAP tax provision is the amount of charges relating to equity-based compensation. Because the charges relating to equity-based compensation are deductible in accordance with applicable tax laws, increases in such charges have the effect of lowering the Company’s non-GAAP effective tax rate and thereby increasing its post-tax Adjusted Earnings.

BGC incurs income tax expenses based on the location, legal structure and jurisdictional taxing authorities of each of its subsidiaries. Certain of the Company’s entities are taxed as U.S. partnerships and are subject to the Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) in New York City. Any U.S. federal and state income tax liability or benefit related to the partnership income or loss, with the exception of UBT, rests with the unit holders rather than with the partnership entity. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes on the Company’s allocable share of the U.S. results of operations. Outside of the U.S., BGC operates principally through subsidiary corporations subject to local income taxes. For these reasons, taxes for Adjusted Earnings are expected to be presented to show the tax provision the consolidated Company would expect to pay if 100% of earnings were taxed at global corporate rates.

Calculations of Pre- and Post-Tax Adjusted Earnings per Share
BGC’s pre- and post-tax Adjusted Earnings per share calculations assume either that:

The fully diluted share count includes the shares related to any dilutive instruments, but excludes the associated expense, net of tax, when the impact would be dilutive; orThe fully diluted share count excludes the shares related to these instruments, but includes the associated expense, net of tax, when the impact would be anti-dilutive.

The share count for Adjusted Earnings excludes certain shares and share equivalents expected to be issued in future periods but not yet eligible to receive dividends and/or distributions. Each quarter, the dividend payable to BGC’s stockholders, if any, is expected to be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors with reference to a number of factors. The declaration, payment, timing, and amount of any future dividends payable by the Company will be at the discretion of its Board of Directors using the fully diluted share count. For more information on any share count adjustments, see the table titled “Fully Diluted Weighted-Average Share Count under GAAP and for Adjusted Earnings” in the Company’s most recent financial results press release.

Management Rationale for Using Adjusted Earnings
BGC’s calculation of Adjusted Earnings excludes the items discussed above because they are either non-cash in nature, because the anticipated benefits from the expenditures are not expected to be fully realized until future periods, or because the Company views results excluding these items as a better reflection of the underlying performance of BGC’s ongoing operations. Management uses Adjusted Earnings in part to help it evaluate, among other things, the overall performance of the Company’s business and to make decisions with respect to the Company’s operations.

The term “Adjusted Earnings” should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to GAAP net income (loss). The Company views Adjusted Earnings as a metric that is not indicative of liquidity, or the cash available to fund its operations, but rather as a performance measure. Pre- and post-tax Adjusted Earnings, as well as related measures, are not intended to replace the Company’s presentation of its GAAP financial results. However, management believes that these measures help provide investors with a clearer understanding of BGC’s financial performance and offer useful information to both management and investors regarding certain financial and business trends related to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Management believes that the GAAP and Adjusted Earnings measures of financial performance should be considered together.

For more information regarding Adjusted Earnings, see the sections of this document and/or in the Company’s most recent financial results press release titled “Reconciliation of GAAP Income (Loss) from Operations before Income Taxes to Adjusted Earnings and GAAP Fully Diluted EPS to Post-Tax Adjusted EPS”, including the related footnotes, for details about how BGC’s non-GAAP results are reconciled to those under GAAP.

Adjusted EBITDA Defined
BGC also provides an additional non-GAAP financial performance measure, “Adjusted EBITDA”, which it defines as GAAP “Net income (loss) available to common stockholders”, adjusted to add back the following items:

Provision (benefit) for income taxes;Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries;Interest expense;Fixed asset depreciation and intangible asset amortization;Equity-based compensation, dividend equivalents and allocations of net income to limited partnership units and FPUs;Impairment of long-lived assets;(Gains) losses on equity method investments; andCertain other non-cash GAAP items, such as non-cash charges of amortized rents.

The Company’s management believes that its Adjusted EBITDA measure is useful in evaluating BGC’s operating performance, because the calculation of this measure generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which would include impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles created from acquisitions. Such items may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, the Company’s management uses this measure to evaluate operating performance and for other discretionary purposes. BGC believes that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors to assist them in getting a more complete picture of the Company’s financial results and operations.

Since BGC’s Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP, investors should use this measure in addition to GAAP measures of net income when analyzing BGC’s operating performance. Because not all companies use identical EBITDA calculations, the Company’s presentation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow or GAAP cash flow from operations because the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA does not consider certain cash requirements, such as tax and debt service payments.

For more information regarding Adjusted EBITDA, see the section of this document and/or in the Company’s most recent financial results press release titled “Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA”, including the footnotes to the same, for details about how BGC’s non-GAAP results are reconciled to those under GAAP.

Timing of Outlook for Certain GAAP and Non-GAAP Items
BGC anticipates providing forward-looking guidance for GAAP revenues and for certain non-GAAP measures from time to time. However, the Company does not anticipate providing an outlook for other GAAP results. This is because certain GAAP items, which are excluded from Adjusted Earnings and/or Adjusted EBITDA, are difficult to forecast with precision before the end of each period. The Company therefore believes that it is not possible for it to have the required information necessary to forecast GAAP results or to quantitatively reconcile GAAP forecasts to non-GAAP forecasts with sufficient precision without unreasonable efforts. For the same reasons, the Company is unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information. The relevant items that are difficult to predict on a quarterly and/or annual basis with precision and may materially impact the Company’s GAAP results include, but are not limited, to the following:

Certain equity-based compensation charges that may be determined at the discretion of management throughout and up to the period-end;Unusual, non-ordinary, or non-recurring items;The impact of gains or losses on certain marketable securities, as well as any gains or losses related to associated mark-to- market movements and/or hedging. These items are calculated using period-end closing prices;Non-cash asset impairment charges, which are calculated and analyzed based on the period-end values of the underlying assets. These amounts may not be known until after period-end; andAcquisitions, dispositions, and/or resolutions of litigation, disputes, investigations, or enforcement matters, or similar items, which are fluid and unpredictable in nature.

Liquidity Defined
BGC may also use a non-GAAP measure called “liquidity”. The Company considers liquidity to be comprised of the sum of cash and cash equivalents, reverse repurchase agreements (if any), financial instruments owned, at fair value, less securities lent out in securities loaned transactions and repurchase agreements (if any). The Company considers liquidity to be an important metric for determining the amount of cash that is available or that could be readily available to the Company on short notice.

For more information regarding Liquidity, see the section of this document and/or in the Company’s most recent financial results press release titled “Liquidity Analysis”, including any footnotes to the same, for details about how BGC’s non-GAAP results are reconciled to those under GAAP.

Constant Currency Defined
BGC generates a significant amount of its revenues in non-U.S. dollar denominated currencies, particularly in the euro and pound sterling. In order to present a better comparison of the Company’s revenues during the period, which exhibited highly volatile foreign exchange movements, BGC provides revenues year-over-year comparisons on a “Constant Currency” basis. BGC uses a Constant Currency financial metric to provide a better comparison of the Company’s underlying operating performance by eliminating the impacts of foreign currency fluctuations between comparative periods. Since BGC’s consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in non-U.S. dollar denominated currencies have an impact on the Company’s GAAP results. The Company’s Constant Currency metric, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, assumes the foreign exchange rates used to determine the Company’s comparative prior period revenues, apply to the current period revenues. Constant Currency revenue percentage change is calculated by determining the change in current quarter non-GAAP Constant Currency revenues over prior period revenues. Non-GAAP Constant Currency revenues are total revenues excluding the effect of foreign exchange rate movements and are calculated by remeasuring and/or translating current quarter revenues using prior period exchange rates. BGC presents certain non-GAAP Constant Currency percentage changes in Constant Currency revenues as a supplementary measure because it facilitates the comparison of the Company’s core operating results. This information should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, results reported in accordance with GAAP.

About BGC Group, Inc.
BGC Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: BGC) is a leading global marketplace, data, and financial technology services company for a broad range of products, including fixed income, foreign exchange, energy, commodities, shipping, equities, and now includes the FMX Futures Exchange. BGC’s clients are many of the world’s largest banks, broker-dealers, investment banks, trading firms, hedge funds, governments, corporations, and investment firms.

BGC and leading global investment banks and market making firms have partnered to create FMX, part of the BGC Group of companies, which includes a U.S. interest rate futures exchange, spot foreign exchange platform and the world’s fastest growing U.S. cash treasuries platform.

For more information about BGC, please visit www.bgcg.com.

Discussion of Forward-Looking Statements about BGC
Statements in this document regarding BGC that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These include statements about the Company’s business, results, financial position, liquidity and outlook, which may constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to the risk that the actual impact may differ, possibly materially, from what is currently expected. Except as required by law, BGC undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. For a discussion of additional risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see BGC’s Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, including, but not limited to, the risk factors and Special Note on Forward-Looking Information set forth in these filings and any updates to such risk factors and Special Note on Forward-Looking Information contained in subsequent reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q or Form 8-K.

Media Contact:
Erica Chase
+1 212-610-2419

Investor Contact:
Jason Chryssicas
+1 212-610-2426

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bgc-group-updates-its-outlook-for-the-fourth-quarter-of-2024-302340455.html

SOURCE BGC Group, Inc.

Technology

Wearable Technology Market Expected to Reach $183.2 Billion by 2031, Growing at a CAGR of 12.75% — Allied Market Research

Published

32 minutes ago

April 21, 2026

Surge in AI & IoT-enabled smart wearables, rising healthcare monitoring demand, and expanding enterprise deployments are reshaping the global wearable technology market.

WILMINGTON, Del., April 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Allied Market Research has published a comprehensive new report titled, “Wearable Technology Market by Device, Product Type, and Application: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2024–2033.” According to the report, the global wearable technology market size was valued at USD 54.8 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 183.2 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 12.75% from 2022 to 2031. Rising global rates of chronic disease, post-pandemic behavioral shifts toward preventive health, and the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence and IoT connectivity into wearable devices are the primary forces fueling robust wearable technology market growth across consumer, clinical, and enterprise segments.

Download Sample Pages of Research Overview:
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/request-sample/355

Key Market Snapshot

Report Title

Wearable Technology Market — Global Opportunity Analysis & Industry Forecast, 2024–2033

Market Size (2020)

USD 54.8 Billion

Market Forecast (2031)

USD 183.2 Billion

CAGR (2022–2031)

12.75 %

Leading Segment by Product

Smartwatches & Fitness Bands

Leading Application

Healthcare & Medical Monitoring

Leading End User

Consumer Electronics Segment

Dominant Region

North America

Fastest Growing Region

Asia-Pacific

Top Growth Driver

AI & IoT-Enabled Wearable Devices

Report Coverage

2017–2033 | Multi-segmented, Multi-regional

Buy This Research Report (196 Pages PDF with Insights, Charts, Tables, and Figures): https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/checkout-final/7dbb6a5d788644207905e99b6b05cfe6

Key Market Insights

Market Size: The global wearable technology market was valued at USD 54.8 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 183.2 billion by 2031 growing at a CAGR of12.75% making it one of the fastest-growing consumer electronics and digital health segments worldwide.The Smartwatches and fitness bands, who are not only growing the presence in the field of heart rate tracking or sleep tracking but also new product advances such contactless payments along with smartphone features basically serving needs for both a proliferation of wellness consumers and burgeoning population of more clinically oriented users.The Highest Growing Application Vertical: Healthcare and medical monitoring is the fastest-growing segment of application vertical, due to increasing clinical validation for ECG monitoring, blood glucose estimation, SpO2 tracking & fall detection in wearable devices — allowing continuous remote patient management.Hearables as a New Subsector: A growing sector of wearables, hearables — smart earbuds and AI-driven hearing aids are one of the most dynamic wearable categories now, propelled further by relaxation of US regulations on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids.Regional Leaders: North America led the market for global wearable technology in 2020 due to high consumer technology adoption, advanced healthcare infrastructure and a strong ecosystem for employer-subsidized wellness programs.Largest Growth Frontier: Equipped with increasing smartphone penetration, expanding urban middle class incomes, and large young rural populations across India, China, South Korea & Southeast Asia; AsiaPacific is undoubtedly the fastest growing region.Artificial intelligence (AI) as an Enabler: The addition of AI built directly into wearables — delivering personalized fitness coaching, real-time alerts to changes in health conditions, anomaly detection and predictive analytics — will finally be transforming the nature of smart watches from mere data collectors to actual intelligent health companions.

Technology Drivers

Introduction There are several converging technologies that will redefine usage wearables. On-device AI and machine learning provide personal fitness recommendations, real-time health alerts, and behavioral coaching to individual users which will drive stickiness on the platform The widespread emergence of 5G infrastructure worldwide is enabling low-latency biosignal streaming to cloud health platforms, paving the way for new use cases in remote patient monitoring and augmented reality wearables along with industrial safety applications.

Flexible batteries, which can keep power-hungry chip designs thinner and allow energy harvesting from body heat and motion, combined with increasingly compact chip design are helping create tinier devices that provide better fulfillment of consumer expectations surrounding comfort and aesthetics. With the birth of smart ring category — small, low-power and unobtrusive devices —shows that appetite is growing for wearable form factors beyond the wrist.

Enquiry Before Buying: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/purchase-enquiry/355

Market Segmentation

Based on Product Type: Smartwatches: & amp; Fitness bands, hearables, medical wearables smart glasses and smart clothing.

By Application: Sports and fitness is still the largest segment by volume, while healthcare and medical monitoring is fastest-growing as biosensors receive clinical validation (for arrhythmia detection), continuous glucose monitoring and chronic disease management.

Global Shipments of Device by End User: Individual consumers are the leader in global shipments of devices. But healthcare providers and enterprise clients are scaling too quickly as wearables move past consumer toys to actual clinical and operational tools with credible ROI. Through comprehensive employee wellness programs, enterprises throughout North America and Europe are integrating wearables into their health initiatives that form another valuable institutional procurement channel, next to where most consumer wearables are sold today retail.

Regional Insights

North America will occupy the largest revenue share as a growing middle class translates to overall health, with high levels of consumer technology adoption and a healthcare system that has embraced remote monitoring. Consumer health wearables are accelerating clinical validation with FDA clearances, and sustained demand is being created by employer subsidized wellness programs, over above direct retail

Technological advances coupled with significant smartphone penetration and an increasing middle-class income are propelling growth of the Asia-Pacific market, which is also home to some of the youngest populations in world (in India, China, South Korea and Southeast Asia). China has the combined characteristics of being the largest manufacturer in the world as well as a large domestic consumer market: many new brands compete fiercely on feature set and price. India is forecast to also experience one of the highest regional growth rates until 2033 from e-commerce expansion and rising urban health awareness.

Europe has a large presence, spinning off notably to the medical and sports performance space. Representing a different landscape of data governance that wearable health platforms face today, consumer privacy awareness is affecting the market and EU digital health regulations actively are shaping product development for manufacturers worldwide. Its the UK and Germany, France and the Nordic nations that are at the fore.

LAMEA (Latin America, Middle East, and Africa) is an emerging high-growth opportunity. In Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar this institutional push for wearables is being supported by government-led incentives for Smart City and digital health initiatives. For Latin American adoption, Brazil leads and South Africa anchors the African wearables ecosystem.

Competitive Landscape

The market is defined by intense competition among technology giants, specialized medical device makers, and consumer electronics challengers:

Apple leads the smartwatch segment with its Apple Watch ecosystem, integrating consumer wellness with clinical-grade health monitoring.Samsung competes through its Galaxy Watch and Galaxy Buds portfolio, backed by the Samsung Health platform.Fitbit (Google) pioneered consumer fitness tracking and is now targeting clinical-grade health monitoring within Google’s broader digital health ecosystem.Garmin commands premium loyalty among athletes and outdoor professionals through precision GPS and biometric analytics.Huawei and Xiaomi dominate volume in Asia-Pacific — Huawei through advanced health sensing and Xiaomi through ultra-competitive pricing in emerging markets.Abbott, Dexcom, and Medtronic lead in medical wearables, particularly continuous glucose monitors and implantable cardiac devices.Meta and Snap are pursuing next-generation augmented reality smart glasses.

Recent Developments

There are a few major trends that will influence the direction of the market in the near term. Non-invasive Blood Glucose monitoring is one of the most awaited features in future smartwatches and for good reason too; it could unlock the world’s biggest diabetic care market. So far, large language model-based AI coaching assistants have been dispersed in wearable platforms and are producing tailored fitness, sleep and stress management advice. For Consumer Domestics: The FDA and CE Clearances for ECG, Atrial Fibrillation Detection, And Blood Oxygen Monitoring Have Notably Broadened the Clinical Legitimacy of Smartwatches from Consumers Ruggedized wearables for workplace safety and augmented reality-assisted operations will deliver a high-value B2B channel targeting enterprise and industrial deployments. With technology conglomerates, healthcare systems, and insurers all vying to consolidate platforms and intellectual property across connected health, strategic M&A and investment activity is accelerating.

Analyst Perspective

Structural Inflection Point for Wearable Tech Market With the largest-aged population globally, they require continuous non-invasive monitoring of heart, lung and brain health by detecting early symptoms. At the same time, healthcare systems pressed financially are transitioning to preventive care models — a switch in which clinically validated consumer wearables form a critical enabling play.

The synthesis of AI-enabled edge computing, 5G, next-generation biosensor arrays, and flexible electronics is creating a new class of devices that will serve not only as data collectors but also as smart health companions with capabilities for personalization, anomaly detection and integration across larger digital health systems.

For market stakeholders, the key success factors all remain constant; device accuracy and clinical validation (with effective engagement that engenders habitual use), platform ecosystem stickiness (entrenchment to create a barrier to competition), data privacy & regulatory compliance, and the demonstrated ability to deliver measurable health outcomes that warrant a premium price point for consumers or institutional uptake. Those companies getting all four of these dimensions right are best positioned to capture outsized value as the market scales through 2033

Explore AMR’s Extensive ongoing Coverage on Consumer and Goods Domain:

Smart Home Appliances Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2024 – 2034
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/smart-home-appliances-market

Digital Accessories Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2023-2032
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/digital-accessories-market

Home Entertainment Devices Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2022–2031
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/home-entertainment-devices-market

Hand Dryer Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2022–2031
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/hand-dryer-market

Electronic Cigarette Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2022–2031
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/electronic-cigarette-market

Air Humidifier Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2024 – 2033
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/air-humidifier-market

Smart Toys Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2023 – 2033
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/smart-toys-market

Dehumidifier Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2022 – 2032
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/dehumidifier-market

Action camera Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast 2021–2027
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/action-camera-market

Residential Washing Machine Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2020-2031
https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/residential-washing-machine-market

About Us

Allied Market Research (AMR) is a full-service market research and business consulting wing of Allied Analytics LLP based in Wilmington, Delaware. Allied Market Research provides end-to-end solutions along with information, education, advocacy, and networking resources to SMEs and early-stage start-ups to bring excellence to their processes. In addition, we offer a nurturing environment required to develop and grow businesses, including business planning; virtual support; market intelligence; acquiring resources; and getting direct access to finance, suppliers, and other experts to boost the growth of businesses and entrepreneurs.

Our bundled and hassle-free business support systems are customized to meet the needs of SME consultants and industry leaders. Moreover, our large network of skilled consultants and experts help start-ups get the business on a roll.

Contact:
David Correa
1209 Orange Street,
Corporation Trust Center,
Wilmington, New Castle,
Delaware 19801 USA.
Int’l: +1-503-894-6022
Toll Free: +1-800-792-5285
Fax: +1-800-792-5285
help@alliedmarketresearch.com
Web: www.alliedmarketresearch.com
Allied Market Research Blog: https://blog.alliedmarketresearch.com
Follow Us on | Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube |

Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/636519/5918347/Allied_Market_Research_Logo.jpg

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/wearable-technology-market-expected-to-reach-183-2-billion-by-2031–growing-at-a-cagr-of-12-75—-allied-market-research-302748411.html

SOURCE Allied Market Research

Technology

AI Innovation Surges as Security Fundamentals Lag, Kroll Research Finds

Published

32 minutes ago

April 21, 2026

Key Takeaways

76% of organizations have experienced a security incident involving AI applications or models in the past two years. 27% of organizations report costs exceeding $1 million from AI-related security incidents.As organizational cyber maturity increases, the likelihood of experiencing an incident involving AI reduces significantly, from 89% (very low maturity) to 54% (very high maturity).

NEW YORK, April 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Kroll, the leading independent provider of global financial and risk advisory solutions, has released global cyber resilience research which reveals that rapid artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is dramatically outpacing governance, security controls and incident preparedness.

It has become clear that AI, and in particular agentic AI, has changed the threat model permanently. The research results indicate that while AI is becoming embedded across enterprise operations, 76% of businesses have experienced a security incident involving AI applications or models in the past two years. The research reveals organizations lack the foundational security practices and governance frameworks necessary to deploy AI safely and effectively, costing almost one-third of organizations (27%) over one million dollars related to AI-related security incidents.

While there is appetite to incorporate the promise of AI into security infrastructure, 90% of respondents surveyed identified barriers preventing greater investment in AI security. Lack of clear ROI, insufficient executive understanding of AI risks and the belief that current measures are sufficient account for 40% of those barriers.

The Innovation-Security Trade-Off

The research shows that most organizations are inadequately prepared for AI threats, despite the rapid increase in attacks.

Organizations spend an average of 13% of their AI initiative budget on using AI to test security controls or to test the models themselves, leaving critical gaps in AI security posture and illuminating a disconnect between AI adoption and AI security investment.Companies with highly mature security practices are six times more likely to spend over 20% of their AI budget on testing security controls.Almost half (48%) of respondents stated they have little to no organizational governance on AI tool and service adoption, creating an expanded attack surface that extends far beyond the organization’s traditional perimeter.

Dave Burg, Global Group Head of Cyber and Data Resilience at Kroll, says, “Organizations are under pressure to embrace AI to respond faster and with greater precision to increasingly complex threats. However, this cannot come at the expense of the basics for prevention, detection and responding to attacks. We’re seeing businesses enthusiastically integrate AI into their operations without getting the fundamentals right first, and that’s creating a dangerous security debt.

The real story isn’t that AI is risky; it’s that without the right foundational security in place, AI amplifies existing security weaknesses. Fortunately, there are opportunities for organizations to remediate this. Kroll was recently among industry leaders joining CrowdStrike’s Charlotte AI AgentWorks Ecosystem which helps operationalize AI within managed detection and response, building tailored agents that accelerate investigations and response.”

Maturity Matters: Organizations with Strong Foundations Experience Significantly Fewer AI Incidents

As organizational cyber maturity increases, the likelihood of experiencing an AI-related security incident drops significantly:

89% of organizations with very low cyber maturity experience AI-related security incidents.In contrast, 54% of organizations with very high cyber maturity experience AI-related security incidents.Even further, 46% of organizations with very high cyber maturity reported zero AI-related cyber incidents in the past two years, demonstrating that robust security foundations directly translate to AI security resilience.This is understandable as 69% of organizations with very high cyber maturity have a centralized AI platform strategy with security controls, compared to just 39% of those with very low cyber maturity.

Quiessence Philips, Head of Security Architecture and Engineering at Kroll, says, “AI’s ability to accelerate productivity and innovation is undeniable, and the goal is not to slow it down. However, adoption without concurrent investment in security foundations is not bold, it’s reckless. The agentic AI ecosystem is now the fastest-growing enterprise attack surface, and the organizations most at risk are the ones chasing the opportunity without building security alongside it. Secure architecture, identity management, incident response, security culture – these aren’t limitations on innovation, but what make innovation sustainable.”

You can access the full report on the Kroll website.

You can also register for the webinar discussing these results in-depth here.

About the Research

Kroll commissioned independent research firm Sapio Research to conduct a comprehensive study into cybersecurity resilience and risk alignment in enterprise organizations. The research surveyed 1,000 cybersecurity decision-makers at companies with annual revenues from $50 million to more than $5 billion across 10 countries: the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Switzerland, the United States, Japan, Singapore, Australia, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. The survey was conducted in November and December 2025.

About Kroll

As the leading independent provider of financial and risk advisory solutions, Kroll leverages our unique insights, data and technology to help clients stay ahead of complex valuation demands. Kroll’s team of more than 6,500 professionals worldwide continues the firm’s nearly 100-year history of trusted expertise spanning risk, governance, transactions and valuation. Our advanced solutions and intelligence provide clients the foresight they need to create an enduring competitive advantage. At Kroll, our values define who we are and how we partner with clients and communities. Learn more at kroll.com.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ai-innovation-surges-as-security-fundamentals-lag-kroll-research-finds-302747672.html

SOURCE Kroll

Technology

Premialab Partners with BBVA CIB

Published

32 minutes ago

April 21, 2026

LONDON, April 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Premialab, the leading independent platform for quantitative analytics and systematic investment strategies, today announced that BBVA Global Markets QIS has joined its global contributor network. BBVA GM QIS will add its suite of rule-based strategies to the Premialab platform and leverage Premialab’s advanced analytics, including its Pure Factors framework, to independently benchmark and analyze performance and risk characteristics. This collaboration underscores Premialab’s commitment to deepening its quantitative solutions ecosystem and offering institutional investors a broader toolkit of data-driven strategies.

BBVA GM QIS offers a diverse suite of systematic strategies spanning equities including thematic and smart beta and systematic asset allocation, both aligned with its well-established Structured Products platform, as well as Alternative Risk Premia indices designed to capture systematic risk premiums available in the market. These solutions can also serve as overlays to traditional portfolios, providing additional income or hedging features.

Together, these investable systematic strategies enable investors to achieve their risk-return objectives by calibrating factor exposures and risk budgets in a flexible, transparent, and cost-efficient manner.

“Joining the Premialab platform is an exciting step for BBVA GM QIS,” said Pablo Suárez, Head of QIS at BBVA Global Markets. “We see Premialab as a natural partner, given the strong alignment between its independent analytics capabilities and our systematic investment framework. Its data infrastructure provides an ideal environment to showcase our strategies to a global institutional audience. This collaboration reflects our commitment to working closely together, enabling investors to better understand the risk and return drivers of our systematic solutions and how they can complement their broader portfolio objectives.”

We are delighted to partner with BBVA GM QIS,” said Adrien Geliot, CEO of Premialab. “Their quantitative expertise and strong track record in developing innovative, rule-based investment solutions align with our mission to bring greater transparency, consistency, and insight to the systematic investing landscape. This partnership expands our coverage and strengthens the value we deliver to institutional investors.

Premialab’s multi-asset, multi-region platform handles over 15 million data points daily across more than 7,000 investible systematic strategies, representing client assets under management of approximately USD 20 trillion. Its proprietary dataset and analytics provide detailed risk decomposition, factor attribution, and scenario-based analysis – enabling investors to make better allocation decisions.

Notes to Editors

About Premialab
Premialab is the leading independent platform that collaborates with leading investment banks and institutional investors globally, providing data, analytics, and risk solutions for systematic, factor, and multi-asset strategies. With offices in London, Paris, New York, Hong Kong, Dubai and Sydney, the company partners with the top 18 investment banks, leading asset managers, pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and insurance companies globally. For more information, please visit: www.premialab.com.

About BBVA CIB

BBVA is a global financial services group founded in 1857. The bank is present in more than 25 countries, has a strong leadership position in the Spanish market, is the largest financial institution in Mexico and it has leading franchises in South America and Turkey. In the United States, BBVA also has a significant investment, transactional, and capital markets banking business.

Its division BBVA Corporate & Investment Banking (BBVA CIB) brings together the activities of investment banking, markets, financing and transactional services for institutional investors and corporate clients. It has a strong global presence, providing services in 25 countries through an extensive team of experts, including investment banking specialists and advisors in specific industries and sectors. BBVA CIB offers a wide range of value-added products and financial solutions, for the simplest needs and for the most complex ones. Its mission is to help clients to carry out their projects and achieve their business, transformation and sustainability objectives, whether they are local or international.

Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2752715/5584590/Premialab_Logo.jpg

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/premialab-partners-with-bbva-cib-302747587.html