Connect with us

Technology

Pixelworks Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2024 Financial Results

Published

on

PORTLAND, Ore., Feb. 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Pixelworks, Inc. (NASDAQ: PXLW), a leading provider of innovative video and display processing solutions, today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

Fourth Quarter and Recent Highlights

Total revenue of $9.1 million, with revenue from the home & enterprise market increasing 14% sequentially and 5% year-over-yearPixelworks Shanghai subsidiary awarded $1.8 million in cash subsidies associated with its previous certification and ongoing participation in China’s “Little Giant” programvivo launched the iQOO Z9 Turbo L smartphone incorporating Pixelworks’ X5 Turbo visual processor, enabling optimized high-frame-rate gaming with reduced power consumption to the mid-tier device marketPixelworks continued to advance its in-depth review of potential strategic options related to inbound interest in the Company’s Pixelworks Shanghai subsidiary

“Fourth quarter results reflected our expectations, with all financial metrics being within or better than our guided range,” stated Todd DeBonis, President and CEO of Pixelworks. “Revenue from the home and enterprise market increased sequentially and year-over-year, helping to partially offset the anticipated product transition in our mobile business. Gross margin expanded for the fourth consecutive quarter to nearly 55%, and our previously implemented cost reduction actions contributed to achieving meaningfully lower operating expenses for the quarter.

“During the fourth quarter and entering 2025, we have remained focused on positioning for a return to growth in our mobile business. We continue to be engaged on multiple customer programs to utilize our latest mobile visual processor solutions in new smartphone models targeted for launch this year. These program engagements include opportunities with our new cost-down visual processor solution targeting mid- and entry-level smartphones, representing expansion of our served target markets. We expect the start of renewed mobile growth in the first quarter, followed by an accelerating ramp of production shipments beginning in the second quarter. We are also encouraged by the growing mindshare and engagement activity with our TrueCut Motion platform and believe we are poised to demonstrate further ecosystem and commercial traction in 2025.

“In summary, we’ve made significant progress on reducing our overall cost structure, and we plan to further these efforts during the first half of 2025 as we simultaneously continue to execute on and deliver renewed growth in mobile. Together with multiple newly targeted revenue opportunities, including customer engagements for ASIC design services as well as IP licensing, we believe that our Pixelworks Shanghai subsidiary is on a clear path to achieve profitability for the full year 2025.”

Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2024 Financial Results

Revenue in the fourth quarter of 2024 was $9.1 million, compared to $9.5 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $20.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The sequential and year-over-year decrease in fourth quarter revenue was driven by lower sales in the Company’s mobile business, partially offset by increased sales in the home and enterprise market. For the full year 2024, total revenue was $43.2 million compared to $59.7 million in 2023. The year-over-year decrease primarily reflected lower revenue contribution from the Company’s mobile business.

On a GAAP basis, gross profit margin in the fourth quarter of 2024 was 54.6%, compared to 51.2% in the third quarter of 2024 and 44.7% in the fourth quarter of 2023. GAAP gross profit margin for the full year 2024 was 51.6% compared to 43.1% in the prior year. Fourth quarter 2024 GAAP operating expenses were $11.5 million, compared to $13.5 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $13.1 million in the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2024, GAAP operating expenses were $53.6 million compared to $54.3 million in the prior year.

On a non-GAAP basis, fourth quarter 2024 gross profit margin was 54.8%, compared to 51.3% in the third quarter of 2024 and 44.8% in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP gross profit margin for the full year 2024 was 51.7% compared to 43.2% in the prior year. Fourth quarter 2024 non-GAAP operating expenses were $10.4 million, compared to $12.4 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $12.0 million in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP operating expenses for the full year 2024 were $48.1 million compared to $49.6 million in the prior year.

For the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company recorded a GAAP net loss of $5.4 million, or ($0.09) per share, compared to a GAAP net loss of $8.1 million, or ($0.14) per share, in the third quarter of 2024, and a GAAP net loss of $3.7 million, or ($0.07) per share, in the year-ago quarter. GAAP net loss for the full year 2024 was $28.7 million, or ($0.49) per share, compared to a net loss $26.2 million, or ($0.47) per share, in the prior year. Note, the Company refers to “net loss attributable to Pixelworks, Inc.” as “net loss”.

For the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company recorded a non-GAAP net loss of $4.3 million, or ($0.07) per share, compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $7.1 million, or ($0.12) per share, in the third quarter of 2024, and a non-GAAP net loss of $2.6 million, or ($0.05) per share, in the fourth quarter of 2023. For the full year 2024, non-GAAP net loss was $23.1 million, or ($0.40) per share, compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $21.4 million, or ($0.38) per share, in the prior year.

Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2024 was a negative $3.6 million, compared to a negative $6.3 million in the third quarter of 2024 and a negative $1.9 million in the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2024, adjusted EBITDA was a negative $20.1 million compared to a negative $18.8 million in the prior year.

Business Outlook

The Company’s current business outlook, including guidance for the first quarter of 2025, will be discussed as part of the scheduled conference call.

Conference Call Information

Pixelworks will host a conference call today, February 12, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. Analysts and investors are invited to join the Company’s conference call using the following information:

Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2024 Conference Call
Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2025
Time: 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time (5:00 p.m. Eastern Time)
Live Webcast Link: Click Here
Dial-in Participation Registration Link: Click Here

Advanced registration is required for dial-in participants. Please complete the linked registration form above to receive a dial-in number and dedicated PIN for accessing the conference call by phone. A live and archived audio webcast of the conference call will also be accessible via the investors section of Pixelworks’ website: www.pixelworks.com.

Pixelworks, Inc.
Pixelworks provides industry-leading content creation, video delivery and display processing solutions and technology that enable highly authentic viewing experiences with superior visual quality, across all screens – from cinema to smartphone and beyond. The Company has a 20-year history of delivering image processing innovation to leading providers of consumer electronics, professional displays, and video streaming services. For more information, please visit the company’s web site at www.pixelworks.com.

Note: Pixelworks, TrueCut Motion and the Pixelworks logo are trademarks of Pixelworks, Inc.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This earnings release makes reference to non-GAAP gross profit margins, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP net loss and non-GAAP net loss per share, which exclude stock-based compensation expense and restructuring expense which are both required under GAAP as well as the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments. The press release also makes reference to and reconciles GAAP net loss and adjusted EBITDA, which Pixelworks defines as GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks before interest income and other, net, income tax provision, depreciation and amortization, as well as the specific items listed above.

Pixelworks management uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally to understand, manage and evaluate the business and establish its operational goals, review its operations on a period-to-period basis, for compensation evaluations, to measure performance, and for budgeting and resource allocation. Pixelworks management believes it is useful for management and investors to review, as applicable, both GAAP information and non-GAAP financial measures to help assess the performance of Pixelworks’ continuing business and to evaluate Pixelworks’ future prospects. These non-GAAP measures, when reviewed together with the GAAP financial information, provide additional transparency and information for comparison and analysis of operating performance and trends. These non-GAAP measures exclude certain items to facilitate management’s review of the comparability of our core operating results on a period-to-period basis.

Because the Company’s non-GAAP financial measures are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, they may not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the comparable GAAP measures and should be read only in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial results as presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures is included in this earnings release which is available in the investor relations section of the Pixelworks website.

Safe Harbor Statement
This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements may be identified by use of terms such as “begin,” “continue,” “will,” “expect”, “believe,” “anticipate” and similar terms or the negative of such terms, and include, without limitation, statements about adoption rates for our mobile visual processor solutions, expected traction for and ramping of production of our mobile products, launch dates of any mobile product, continued adoption of our TrueCut Motion platform, expected revenue from ASIC design services and IP licensing, results of cost savings, and expected path to profitability for Pixelworks Shanghai. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of this release, including any projections of revenue or other financial items or any statements regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company’s business. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual results could vary materially from those contained in forward looking statements due to many factors, including, without limitation: the actual adoption of TrueCut Motion platform; the actual performance of the smartphone market; our ability to execute on our strategy; competitive factors, such as rival chip architectures, introduction or traction by competing designs, or pricing pressures; the success of our products in new or expanding markets; current global economic challenges; changes in the digital display and projection markets; seasonality in the consumer electronics market;  our efforts to achieve profitability from operations; our limited financial resources; and our ability to attract and retain key personnel. More information regarding potential factors that could affect the Company’s financial results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements is included from time to time in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as well as subsequent SEC filings.

The forward-looking statements contained in this release are as of the date of this release, and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

[Financial Tables Follow] 

 

PIXELWORKS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

 Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

September 30,

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2024

2024

2023

2024

2023

Revenue, net

$                 9,090

$                 9,527

$               20,074

$               43,206

$               59,677

Cost of revenue (1)

4,124

4,648

11,098

20,921

33,968

Gross profit

4,966

4,879

8,976

22,285

25,709

Operating expenses:

Research and development (2)

6,916

8,405

6,953

31,337

30,878

Selling, general and administrative (3)

4,425

5,016

6,151

20,697

23,467

Restructuring

115

90

—

1,608

—

Total operating expenses

11,456

13,511

13,104

53,642

54,345

Loss from operations

(6,490)

(8,632)

(4,128)

(31,357)

(28,636)

Government subsidies received

1,100

—

—

1,100

—

Interest income and other, net

141

296

435

1,198

2,050

Total other income, net

1,241

296

435

2,298

2,050

Loss before income taxes

(5,249)

(8,336)

(3,693)

(29,059)

(26,586)

Provision for income taxes

216

125

39

478

357

Net loss

(5,465)

(8,461)

(3,732)

(29,537)

(26,943)

Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests and redeemable non-controlling interests

102

320

(12)

818

767

Net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$               (5,363)

$               (8,141)

$               (3,744)

$             (28,719)

$             (26,176)

Net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc. per share – basic and diluted

$                 (0.09)

$                 (0.14)

$                 (0.07)

$                 (0.49)

$                 (0.47)

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted

59,228

58,717

56,895

58,395

56,163

____________

(1) Includes:

Stock-based compensation

12

13

22

53

89

Restructuring

—

—

—

16

—

(2) Includes stock-based compensation

266

327

396

1,239

1,866

(3) Includes stock-based compensation

638

702

701

2,666

2,841

 

PIXELWORKS, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION *
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

 Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

September 30,

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2024

2024

2023

2024

2023

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP gross profit

GAAP gross profit

$                 4,966

$                 4,879

$                 8,976

$               22,285

$               25,709

Stock-based compensation

12

13

22

53

89

Restructuring

—

—

—

16

—

Total reconciling items included in gross profit

12

13

22

69

89

Non-GAAP gross profit

$                 4,978

$                 4,892

$                 8,998

$               22,354

$               25,798

Non-GAAP gross profit margin

54.8 %

51.3 %

44.8 %

51.7 %

43.2 %

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses

GAAP operating expenses

$               11,456

$               13,511

$               13,104

$               53,642

$               54,345

Reconciling item included in research and development:

Stock-based compensation

266

327

396

1,239

1,866

Reconciling items included in selling, general and administrative:

Stock-based compensation

638

702

701

2,666

2,841

Restructuring

115

90

—

1,608

—

Total reconciling items included in operating expenses

1,019

1,119

1,097

5,513

4,707

Non-GAAP operating expenses

$               10,437

$               12,392

$               12,007

$               48,129

$               49,638

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks, Inc.

GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$               (5,363)

$               (8,141)

$               (3,744)

$             (28,719)

$             (26,176)

Reconciling items included in gross profit

12

13

22

69

89

Reconciling items included in operating expenses

1,019

1,119

1,097

5,513

4,707

Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments

—

(74)

—

—

—

Non-GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$               (4,332)

$               (7,083)

$               (2,625)

$             (23,137)

$             (21,380)

Non-GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc. per share – basic and diluted

$                 (0.07)

$                 (0.12)

$                 (0.05)

$                 (0.40)

$                 (0.38)

Non-GAAP weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted

59,228

58,717

56,895

58,395

56,163

*Set forth above are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The non-GAAP financial measure disclosed by the company has limitations and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the reconciliations from GAAP to Non-GAAP actuals should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this document for an explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.

 

PIXELWORKS, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP  NET LOSS PER SHARE *
(Figures may not sum due to rounding)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

 Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

September 30,

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2024

2024

2023

2024

2023

Dollars per share

Dollars per share

Dollars per share

Dollars per share

Dollars per share

Basic

Diluted

Basic

Diluted

Basic

Diluted

Basic

Diluted

Basic

Diluted

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks, Inc.

GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$      (0.09)

$      (0.09)

$      (0.14)

$      (0.14)

$      (0.07)

$      (0.07)

$      (0.49)

$      (0.49)

$      (0.47)

$      (0.47)

Reconciling items included in gross profit

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Reconciling items included in operating expenses

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.09

0.09

0.08

0.08

Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments

—

—

(0.00)

(0.00)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Non-GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$      (0.07)

$      (0.07)

$      (0.12)

$      (0.12)

$      (0.05)

$      (0.05)

$      (0.40)

$      (0.40)

$      (0.38)

$      (0.38)

*Set forth above are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The non-GAAP financial measure disclosed by the company has limitations and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the reconciliations from GAAP to Non-GAAP actuals should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this document for an explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.

 

PIXELWORKS, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP  GROSS PROFIT MARGIN *
(Figures may not sum due to rounding)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

 Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

September 30,

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2024

2024

2023

2024

2023

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP gross profit margin

GAAP gross profit margin

54.6 %

51.2 %

44.7 %

51.6 %

43.1 %

Stock-based compensation

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

Restructuring

— %

— %

— %

0.0 %

— %

Total reconciling items included in gross profit

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.1 %

0.2 %

0.1 %

Non-GAAP gross profit margin

54.8 %

51.3 %

44.8 %

51.7 %

43.2 %

*Set forth above are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The non-GAAP financial measure disclosed by the company has limitations and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the reconciliations from GAAP to Non-GAAP actuals should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this document for an explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.

 

PIXELWORKS, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION *
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

 Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

September 30,

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2024

2024

2023

2024

2023

Reconciliation of GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc. and adjusted EBITDA

GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$            (5,363)

$            (8,141)

$            (3,744)

$          (28,719)

$          (26,176)

Stock-based compensation

916

1,042

1,119

3,958

4,796

Restructuring

115

90

—

1,624

—

Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments

—

(74)

—

—

—

Non-GAAP net loss attributable to Pixelworks Inc.

$            (4,332)

$            (7,083)

$            (2,625)

$          (23,137)

$          (21,380)

EBITDA adjustments:

Depreciation and amortization

$                 691

$                 920

$              1,076

$              3,779

$              4,287

Interest income and other, net

(141)

(296)

(435)

(1,198)

(2,050)

Non-GAAP provision for income taxes

216

199

39

478

357

Adjusted EBITDA

$            (3,566)

$            (6,260)

$            (1,945)

$          (20,078)

$          (18,786)

*Set forth above are reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The non-GAAP financial measure disclosed by the company has limitations and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the reconciliations from GAAP to Non-GAAP actuals should be carefully evaluated. Please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this document for an explanation of the adjustments made to the comparable GAAP measures, the ways management uses the non-GAAP measures, and the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors.

 

PIXELWORKS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

December 31,
2024

December 31,
2023

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$                     23,647

$                     47,544

Accounts receivable, net

5,804

10,075

Inventories

4,210

3,968

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,191

3,138

Total current assets

34,852

64,725

Property and equipment, net

6,500

5,997

Operating lease right of use assets

3,368

4,725

Other assets, net

945

2,115

Goodwill

18,407

18,407

Total assets

$                     64,072

$                     95,969

LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$                       1,400

$                       2,416

Accrued liabilities and current portion of long-term liabilities

6,581

9,692

Current portion of income taxes payable

365

189

Total current liabilities

8,346

12,297

Long-term liabilities, net of current portion

375

1,373

Deposit liability

13,109

13,781

Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion

1,450

2,567

Income taxes payable, net of current portion

914

939

Total liabilities

24,194

30,957

Redeemable non-controlling interest

27,396

28,214

Total Pixelworks, Inc. shareholders’ equity

(10,568)

12,541

Non-controlling interest

23,050

24,257

Total shareholders’ equity

12,482

36,798

Total liabilities, redeemable non-controlling interest and shareholders’ equity

$                     64,072

$                     95,969

 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pixelworks-reports-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2024-financial-results-302375256.html

SOURCE Pixelworks, Inc.

Continue Reading

Technology

In HelloNation, Real Estate Expert Lee Malcom Explains Why Local Knowledge Matters When Buying Older Homes

Published

on

By

The article outlines key inspection priorities and explains how local expertise helps buyers evaluate older properties.

MONROE, Ga., Oct. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — What should buyers look for when purchasing an older home?

HelloNation published an article that answers this question, drawing on insights from Lee Malcom, real estate expert at Malcom & Malcom Realty Professionals LLC in Monroe, Georgia.

The article examines the unique opportunities and responsibilities of buying older homes. While many buyers are drawn to historic details, mature landscaping, and established neighborhoods, the article explains that age can also bring maintenance concerns that deserve careful evaluation before a purchase.

According to a HelloNation article, one of the most important areas to assess during an older-home inspection is the roof. Roofing systems naturally deteriorate over time, and replacement costs can be substantial. The article notes that understanding the roof’s age, condition, and maintenance history can help buyers anticipate future expenses and avoid unexpected repairs. Professional evaluations can also reveal leaks, damaged materials, and ventilation issues that may not show up during a casual walkthrough.

The article also highlights the importance of reviewing plumbing systems. Many older homes contain materials and components installed decades ago that may no longer meet modern standards. Corrosion, leaks, and reduced water pressure can create challenges for homeowners. The article explains that evaluating plumbing systems before purchase allows buyers to better understand potential upgrade or repair needs.

Electrical systems represent another key area of focus. The article explains that older wiring, electrical panels, and outlets may have been designed for households with much lower power demands than today. Modern families often rely on many electronic devices and appliances, so it’s important to determine whether existing electrical systems can safely support current usage.

The article also discusses foundation concerns as part of a comprehensive evaluation process. The article explains that while minor cracks may be common in some homes, larger issues can signal structural problems. Uneven floors, sticking doors, and visible foundation movement may warrant additional professional assessment before buyers decide to purchase.

The HelloNation article emphasizes that a detailed inspection of an older home can uncover concerns early and provide valuable information about future maintenance responsibilities. Understanding the condition of major systems allows buyers to make more informed decisions and prepare for potential ownership costs.

Beyond physical inspections, the article explains why local real estate knowledge matters when buying an older property. Experienced professionals often understand neighborhood histories, regional building practices, and long-term housing trends that may not appear in standard property disclosures. This knowledge helps buyers better evaluate the risks and opportunities associated with older homes.

For those exploring Walton County real estate, local expertise can provide important context regarding construction methods, neighborhood development patterns, and common maintenance issues found throughout the area. The article notes that this understanding helps buyers approach purchasing decisions with greater confidence and a clearer understanding of long-term ownership expectations.

The article also discusses the value of working with professionals who maintain strong local networks. Access to trusted inspectors, roofing specialists, contractors, and foundation experts can help buyers obtain reliable assessments and accurate information before finalizing a transaction.

Why Local Knowledge Matters When Buying Older Homes features insights from Lee Malcom, real estate expert in Monroe, Georgia, in HelloNation.

About HelloNation

HelloNation is America’s Good News Network, a premier media platform built on the idea that good news travels faster when real people tell real stories. Through its community-focused publications and innovative “edvertising” approach, HelloNation delivers content that informs, inspires, and spotlights the leaders making a meaningful impact in their communities.

www.hellonation.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/in-hellonation-real-estate-expert-lee-malcom-explains-why-local-knowledge-matters-when-buying-older-homes-302910870.html

SOURCE HelloNation

Continue Reading

Technology

EZRA, the coaching arm of the Adecco Group, launches Loop – the first connected human and AI coaching experience

Published

on

By

The first connected coaching experience pairs a dedicated ICF-accredited coach and Cai, an AI development partner that remembers conversations, priorities and organizational context to enable manager performance enhancement

ZURICH, Oct. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — EZRA, the enterprise coaching arm of the Adecco Group (SIX: ADEN), today launched EZRA Loop, a first-of-its-kind fully connected coaching experience that combines human expertise with AI to help managers build the skills needed to lead in the age of AI.

As AI becomes part of everyday work, hybrid workforce orchestration is about redesigning work so people and AI agents each contribute where they create the most value and impact.

In this new environment, managers are under increasing pressure to lead change, navigate complexity and develop their teams. Yet coaching remains out of reach for most employees. EZRA Loop democratizes coaching: businesses can now provide managers with an always-on AI development partner that knows exactly when to loop in a dedicated, accredited human coach.

Denis Machuel, CEO of the Adecco Group: “As AI changes how work gets done, organizations need to bring their people along with them. Loop shows how human expertise and AI support can work together to make coaching more accessible, in the flow of work. This is an excellent example of how to leverage technology, while retaining a human touch, judgement and trust that only people can provide. In the hybrid – human-AI – workplace, it is essential to intentionally design how people and technology interact.”

Research shows that teams led by coached managers resolved customer problems 18% faster. Drawing on insights from more than a million coaching sessions with 200,000 people across its customers including companies like Microsoft, Spotify, Mastercard, HSBC, Eli Lilly and KPMG, EZRA found that AI and human coaching each excel in different areas. It noticed that AI support outperformed human coaches on task skills such as prioritization and goal setting, while human coaching outperformed on interpersonal skills like emotional intelligence and executive presence. Together, humans and AI, outperform either alone, driving a 37% increased chance of behavioral changes. 

This combination reflects a broader shift across organizations where the greatest value is increasingly created not by humans or AI working independently, but by orchestrating the interaction between people and technology.

To access the full text of the press release, click here: https://www.adeccogroup.com/our-group/media/press-releases/ezra-launch-loop-human-ai-coahing

About The Adecco Group

The Adecco Group is the world’s leading talent and technology expertise company. Our purpose is making the future work for everyone. Through our three global business units – Adecco, Akkodis and LHH – across 60 countries, we enable sustainable and lifelong employability for individuals, deliver digital engineering consulting to innovate and accelerate business transformation and empower organizations to optimize their workforces. The Adecco Group leads by example and is committed to fostering sustainable employability and supporting resilient economies and communities. The Adecco Group AG is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland (ISIN: CH0012138605) and listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (ADEN). https://www.adeccogroup.com/

About EZRA

EZRA is the connected coaching company that gives every manager a coach. Founded in 2019 as part of The Adecco Group, EZRA has delivered more than a million coaching sessions to over 200,000 people in 120 countries and 75 languages. EZRA combines behavioral science with 4,500 ICF-accredited human coaches and Cai, its AI development partner, to deliver coaching that drives behavior changes, leadership development and better performance. Companies like Microsoft, Spotify, Mastercard, HSBC, Eli Lilly, KPMG and ServiceNow rely on EZRA coaching. 

For further information please contact:

The Adecco Group Corporate Press Office
media@adeccogroup.com
Rodrigo Sánchez Flórez – Tel: +34 658 06 54 02 / Jürg Schneider – Tel: +41 79 876 09 21
r.sanchezflores@adecco.com / Juerg.Schneider@adeccogroup.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/ezra-the-coaching-arm-of-the-adecco-group-launches-loop–the-first-connected-human-and-ai-coaching-experience-302919320.html

Continue Reading

Technology

EaseUS Software Releases Disk Health Insights Report 2026 H1 from 440K Disk Samples, Finding HDDs Show a 20x Higher Share of Caution/Bad Ratings Than SSDs

Published

on

By

NEW YORK, Oct. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — EaseUS Software released the Disk Health Insights Report 2026 H1 from 444,282 disk samples, highlighting differences in HDD and SSD health ratings, key warning indicators, and storage characteristics that may warrant closer monitoring.

According to this report, HDD samples were substantially more likely than SSD samples to receive a Caution or Bad health rating: 24.83% of sampled HDDs received one of these ratings, compared with 1.22% of sampled SSDs – a difference of approximately 20 times in the share of health warnings.

The findings highlight the importance of regular disk health checks and proactive data protection, particularly for users who continue to rely on hard disk drives.

How Did EaseUS Lab Conduct This Disk Health Report?

EaseUS Lab, in collaboration with the EaseUS Partition Master R&D and technical support teams, conducted this study and analyzed 444,828 HDD and SSD samples collected from February 1 through July 31, 2026.

The EaseUS Lab examined disk health ratings and S.M.A.R.T. diagnostic indicators, as well as drive capacity, power-on hours (POH), partition styles, and Windows system drive configurations. Rather than measuring actual failure rates or predicting the remaining lifespan of individual drives, the report identifies patterns in observed health ratings and characteristics associated with a higher share of warnings in the dataset.

Alongside the differences between HDDs and SSDs, the findings revealed several noteworthy patterns, including:

HDDs with capacities below 500 GB showed a 35.89% share of Caution/Bad ratings, while those with more than 5,000 power-on hours recorded a 28.10% share.MBR HDDs also showed a higher share of Caution/Bad ratings than GPT HDDs, at 34.14% versus 19.29%.The share of HDDs receiving Caution/Bad ratings was nearly identical when C: drive utilization reached 90% or higher.

These findings help Windows users identify key disk health warning signs, protect important data, and prepare for migration or replacement when needed.

The following key findings offer a more thorough look at the report’s most notable disk health patterns and the factors that may warrant closer attention.

Core Findings: Five Key Insights Into Windows Disk Health

According to the report, EaseUS Lab identified five key findings to help users better understand disk health and prioritize maintenance.

1. HDDs Show a Higher Share of Caution and Bad Health Ratings

Among sampled HDDs, 74.73% were rated Good, 23.04% Caution, and 1.78% Bad. By comparison, 98.26% of sampled SSDs were rated Good, while 0.21% were rated Caution and 1.01% Bad.

Overall, 24.83% of HDDs were rated Caution or Bad, compared with 1.22% of SSDs.

Although SSDs show a much lower risk of getting Caution/Bad ratings, it still matters to run regular SSD health checks and take timely action when significant warnings remain.

2. Reallocated Sectors and Read Errors Stand Out Among HDD Warning Indicators

The report identifies S.M.A.R.T. attribute 05, Reallocated Sectors Count, and attribute 01, Read Error Rate, as notable HDD warning indicators.

Reallocated Sectors Count was reported in 5.06% of HDD samples, while Read Error Rate was reported in 1.62%. Among the warning indicators recorded in HDDs rated Bad, these attributes accounted for 70.00% and 22.47%, respectively.

These findings highlight the importance of combining overall health rating with significant diagnostic indicators. When significant warnings appear, users should prioritize protecting important data and determine whether disk cloning, migration, or replacement is appropriate.

3. Smaller-Capacity, Longer-Running, and MBR HDDs Show Higher Shares of Health Warnings

The report found higher Caution/Bad shares in several HDD groups:

35.89% of HDDs with capacities below 500 GB were rated Caution or Bad.28.10% of HDDs with more than 5,000 power-on hours (POH) were rated Caution or Bad.34.14% of MBR HDDs were rated Caution or Bad, compared with 19.29% of GPT HDDs.

These patterns identify scenarios that may warrant closer monitoring. However, the findings do not indicate that smaller capacity, longer operating hours, or MBR partitioning style may directly cause disk health to decline. Users should consider these characteristics alongside diagnostic results, device configuration, and usage history when planning maintenance or migration.

4. Low C: Drive Space Does Not Necessarily Indicate Poor HDD Health

This study also examined the relationship between C: drive utilization and disk health, using 90% utilization as the threshold for high storage pressure.

Among HDDs, 29.04% of samples with C: drive utilization at or above 90% were rated Caution or Bad, compared with 29.32% of those below 90%. The similar result doesn’t show a direct relationship between C: drive utilization and poorer HDD health in this dataset.Among SSDs, the Caution/Bad share was 1.83% in the high-utilization group and 0.89% in the lower-utilization group. Although the high-utilization group showed a higher share of Caution/Bad ratings, the data do not show a causal relationship.

For Windows users, low disk space and disk health issues are distinct concerns and should be evaluated separately, even when both issues affect the same device.

5. HDDs Continue to Power a Meaningful Share of Windows Systems

Despite the growing adoption of SSDs, HDDs accounted for 17.79% of sampled Windows system drives. GPT accounted for 75.46% of system drives, while MBR remained in use on 24.54%.

These findings show effective disk health management requires more than mere disk diagnostics. Windows users with HDDs should also consider storage capacity, data protection, partition compatibility, and SSD migration operations.

Industry Implications: Disk Health Detection Is Shifting to Proactive Management

According to this report, disk health diagnostics are taking a broader role in Windows storage management.

A single health rating can indicate whether a further investigation is needed, but it can’t provide a complete picture of storage readiness or determine the remaining lifespan of a disk drive.

This report highlights three practical priorities for disk management providers, PC support teams, and individual users:

Don’t ignore and check for early warning signs. Review overall health status along with S.M.A.R.T. indicators, power-on hours, and other drive details rather than relying on a single indicator.Back up data in advance. When a drive receives a Caution or Bad rating, confirm the reported issue and back up important files before making further decisions.Prepare for disk drive upgrade. If a drive is aging or running out of space, check the new drive’s capacity, partition style, and BIOS/UEFI compatibility before migrating or replacing a system drive.

This approach helps users understand disk health warnings and take appropriate action without assuming every warning signals an immediate drive failure.

Actionable Suggestions to Protect HDD and SSD Health in Windows

Based on the report’s findings, EaseUS Lab recommends a practical approach to disk health management tailored to the condition of each drive.

Drives in Good Status: Continue normal use, back up data regularly, and check disk health periodically.Drives in Caution Status: Review warning indicators, back up important files, and monitor disk health.Drives in Bad Status: Back up data first and consider drive replacement or data recovery if needed.Using small or aging HDDs: Monitor disk health and consider upgrading to an SSD if appropriate.Disk with low C: drive space issue: Free up space or expand the partition; low space alone does not indicate disk failure.HDD-to-SSD migration: Check disk health, target capacity, and boot compatibility before migrating.

The report emphasizes a complete process to take as long as a user is using a disk drive on their devices: Check Disk Health → Protect Data → Prepare New Disk → Migrate or Replace Disk. The goal is not simply to label a drive as healthy or unhealthy, but to help users respond appropriately to the available evidence.

The full report, including detailed findings and practical recommendations, is available at: https://www.easeus.com/whitepapers/disk-health-insights-report-2026-h1.html

About EaseUS Software

Founded in 2004, EaseUS is a software provider specializing in data recovery, disk management, data backup, and multimedia solutions. Trusted by users in more than 160 countries and regions, EaseUS develops accessible software to help individuals and businesses manage, protect, and make the most of their digital data. For more information, visit https://www.easeus.com.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/easeus-software-releases-disk-health-insights-report-2026-h1-from-440k-disk-samples-finding-hdds-show-a-20x-higher-share-of-cautionbad-ratings-than-ssds-302919108.html

SOURCE EaseUS Software

Continue Reading

Trending