Technology
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC. REPORTS FISCAL 2025 FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR-END RESULTS
Published
2 years agoon
By
THE WOODLANDS, Texas, April 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND) (“MIND” or the “Company”) today announced financial results for its fiscal 2025 fourth quarter and year ended January 31, 2025.
Revenues from continuing operations for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 were approximately $15.0 million compared to $12.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and $13.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024.
The Company reported operating income from continuing operations of approximately $2.8 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 compared to operating income of $1.9 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and operating income of $2.3 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. For the full year of fiscal 2025 the Company reported operating income from continuing operations of $6.8 million compared to $518,000 in fiscal 2024. Net income for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 amounted to approximately $2.0 million compared to $1.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 net income attributable to common shareholders was $2.0 million, or $0.25 per share compared to $494,000, or $0.35 per share in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024.
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 was approximately $3.0 million compared to $2.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2025 and $2.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations, which is a non-GAAP measure, is defined and reconciled to reported net income (loss) from continuing operations and cash used in operating activities in the accompanying financial tables. These are the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP.
The backlog of Marine Technology Products as of January 31, 2025 related to our Seamap segment was approximately $16.2 million compared to $26.2 million at October 31, 2024 and $38.4 million at January 31, 2024. However, subsequent to January 31, 2025 the Company has received orders totaling approximately $15.9 million.
Rob Capps, MIND’s President and Chief Executive Officer, stated, “We are very pleased to report another solid quarter and continue our trend of profitability. While there will undoubtedly be quarterly fluctuations going forward, our backlog and pipeline of business and the general market tailwinds give us belief that this trend will continue into fiscal 2026. In the fourth quarter, we once again generated positive cash flow from operations and ended the quarter with cash on hand of approximately $5.3 million. Such measures underscore our solid financial position.
“I am very pleased with where MIND is positioned today. We have stabilized the company, restored it to profitability and positioned ourselves to take advantage of opportunities within our existing and future markets,” added Capps. “However, we are still a small company, which presents certain challenges. We believe that to maximize stockholder value, MIND needs additional scale. We have identified organic growth opportunities that could help grow the Company. However, we also believe there are several other ways to achieve additional scale, including acquiring assets or businesses, combining with other organizations, or even an outright sale of the Company. All of these options are open to us, and we intend to investigate and analyze them. To assist us with this effort, we have retained Lucid Capital Markets LLC.
“We currently do not see a need to raise additional capital and have no near-term plans to do so. However, we do think it prudent to prepare ourselves should a need arises in the future, such as in connection with financing internal growth projects or the purchase of assets or a business. Therefore, we intend to file a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the very near future. This will allow us to move quickly and efficiently should circumstances dictate,” concluded Capps.
Any offer, solicitation or sale of any of the securities registered under the registration statement will be made only by means of the prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement once the registration statement is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities, nor may there be any sale of the Company’s common stock or other securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement with the SEC and registration or qualification under the securities law of any state or jurisdiction.
CONFERENCE CALL
Management has scheduled a conference call for Wednesday, April 23, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time (8:00 a.m. Central Time) to discuss the Company’s fiscal 2025 fourth quarter and year-end results. To access the call, please dial (412) 902-0030 and ask for the MIND Technology call at least 10 minutes prior to the start time. Investors may also listen to the conference live on the MIND Technology website, http://mind-technology.com, by logging onto the site and clicking “Investor Relations”. A telephonic replay of the conference call will be available through April 30, 2025, and may be accessed by calling (201) 612-7415 and using passcode 13751817#. A webcast archive will also be available at http://mind-technology.com shortly after the call and will be accessible for approximately 90 days. For more information, please contact Dennard Lascar Investor Relations by email at MIND@dennardlascar.com.
ABOUT MIND TECHNOLOGY
MIND Technology, Inc. provides technology to the oceanographic, hydrographic, defense, seismic and security industries. Headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas, MIND has a global presence with key operating locations in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom. Its Seamap unit designs, manufactures and sells specialized, high performance, marine exploration and survey equipment.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements and information in this press release concerning results for the quarter and year ended January 31, 2025 may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, our business strategy and plans, and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “should,” “would,” “could” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on us. While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, there can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we anticipate. All comments concerning our expectations for future revenues and operating results are based on our forecasts of our existing operations and do not include the potential impact of any future acquisitions or dispositions. Our forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, reductions in our customers’ capital budgets, our own capital budget, limitations on the availability of capital or higher costs of capital, and volatility in commodity prices for oil and natural gas.
For additional information regarding known material factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results, please see our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, unless required by law, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All forward-looking statements included in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to herein.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Certain statements and information in this press release contain non-GAAP financial measures. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance, financial position, or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Company management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with the GAAP financial measures, provide information that is useful to investors in understanding period-over-period operating results separate and apart from items that may, or could, have a disproportionately positive or negative impact on results in any particular period. Company management also believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance the ability of investors to analyze the Company’s business trends and to understand the Company’s performance. In addition, the Company may utilize non-GAAP financial measures as guides in its forecasting, budgeting, and long-term planning processes and to measure operating performance for some management compensation purposes. Any analysis of non-GAAP financial measures should be used only in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliation of Backlog, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is not included in this press release due to the inherent difficulty and impracticality of quantifying certain amounts that would be required to calculate the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
-Tables to Follow-
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
January 31,
2025
2024
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
5,336
$
5,289
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $332 at January 31, 2025 and
2024
11,817
6,566
Inventories, net
13,745
13,371
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
1,217
3,113
Total current assets
32,115
28,339
Property and equipment, net
890
818
Operating lease right-of-use assets
1,320
1,324
Intangible assets, net
2,308
2,888
Deferred tax asset
87
122
Total assets
$
36,720
$
33,491
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$
2,558
$
1,623
Deferred revenue
189
203
Customer deposits
1,603
3,446
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
1,245
2,140
Income taxes payable
2,473
2,114
Operating lease liabilities – current
577
751
Total current liabilities
8,645
10,277
Operating lease liabilities – non-current
743
573
Total liabilities
9,388
10,850
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and
outstanding at January 31, 2025 and 1,683 shares issued and outstanding at January
31, 2024
—
37,779
Common stock $0.01 par value; 40,000 shares authorized; 7,969 and 1,406 shares
issued at January 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively
80
14
Additional paid-in capital
135,666
113,121
Accumulated deficit
(108,448)
(128,307)
Accumulated other comprehensive gain
34
34
Total stockholders’ equity
27,332
22,641
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
36,720
$
33,491
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
For the Three Months
Ended January 31,
For the Twelve Months
Ended January 31,
2025
2024
2025
2024
Revenues:
Sale of marine technology products
$
15,044
$
13,378
$
46,863
$
36,510
Cost of sales:
Sale of marine technology products
8,494
7,137
25,896
20,539
Gross profit
6,550
6,241
20,967
15,971
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative
2,986
2,982
11,291
12,142
Research and development
562
654
1,914
2,133
Depreciation and amortization
220
286
944
1,178
Total operating expenses
3,768
3,922
14,149
15,453
Operating income
2,782
2,319
6,818
518
Other income (expense):
Other income (expense), net
(80)
(80)
240
(280)
Other (expense) income
(80)
(80)
240
(280)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
2,702
2,239
7,058
238
Provision for income taxes
(671)
(748)
(1,984)
(1,338)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
2,031
1,491
5,074
(1,100)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
—
(50)
—
1,374
Net income
$
2,031
$
1,441
$
5,074
$
274
Gain on Preferred Stock conversion
$
—
$
—
$
14,785
$
—
Preferred stock dividends – declared
—
—
—
(946)
Preferred stock dividends – undeclared
—
(947)
(2,256)
(2,842)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
2,031
$
494
$
17,603
$
(3,514)
Net income (loss) per common share – Basic and diluted
Continuing operations
$
0.25
$
0.39
$
4.32
$
(3.48)
Discontinued operations
$
—
$
(0.04)
$
—
$
0.98
Net income (loss)
$
0.25
$
0.35
$
4.32
$
(2.50)
Shares used in computing loss per common share:
Basic
7,969
1,406
4,078
1,406
Diluted
7,969
1,406
4,078
1,406
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Year Ended January 31,
2025
2024
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
5,074
$
274
Depreciation and amortization
944
1,516
Stock-based compensation
235
261
Gain on sale of Klein
—
(2,343)
Provision for inventory obsolescence
68
341
Gross profit from sale of other equipment
(457)
(476)
Deferred tax benefit
35
(153)
Changes in:
Accounts receivable
(5,246)
(3,343)
Unbilled revenue
(7)
25
Inventories
(441)
(3,601)
Income taxes receivable and payable
360
635
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
45
(334)
Prepaid expenses and other current and long-term assets
1,897
(847)
Deferred revenue
(1,856)
3,078
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
651
(4,967)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment
(437)
(290)
Sale of other assets
457
476
Proceeds from the sale of Klein, net
—
10,832
Net cash provided by investing activities
20
11,018
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from short-term loan
—
2,947
Payment on short-term loan
—
(3,750)
Refund of prepaid interest on short-term loan
—
214
Preferred stock conversion transaction costs
(619)
—
Preferred stock dividends
—
(946)
Net cash used in financing activities
(619)
(1,535)
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
(5)
(5)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
47
4,511
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
5,289
778
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
5,336
$
5,289
MIND TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reconciliation of Net Loss From Continuing Operations and Net Cash Used in Operating Activities to EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA From Continuing Operations
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
For the Three Months
Ended January 31,
For the Twelve Months
Ended January 31,
2025
2024
2025
2024
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
from continuing operations
Net income
$
2,031
$
1,441
$
5,074
$
274
Interest expense, net
$
—
$
98
$
—
$
634
Depreciation and amortization
220
286
944
1,516
Provision for income taxes
671
742
1,984
1,355
EBITDA
2,922
2,567
8,002
3,779
(Income) loss from discontinued operations net of depreciation and
amortization
—
54
—
(1,729)
Stock-based compensation
95
(3)
235
261
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations (1)
$
3,017
$
2,618
$
8,237
$
2,311
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Operating
Activities to EBITDA
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
2,058
$
657
$
651
$
(4,967)
Stock-based compensation
(95)
3
(235)
(261)
Provision for inventory obsolescence
(1)
(318)
(68)
(341)
Changes in accounts receivable (current and long-term)
2,411
2,681
5,253
3,318
Interest paid
—
98
—
634
Taxes paid, net of refunds
243
230
1,654
847
Gain on sale of other equipment
—
91
457
476
Gain on the sale of Klein
—
(50)
—
2,343
Changes in inventory
(3,503)
427
441
3,601
Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current
liabilities and deferred revenue
1,621
(2,674)
1,811
(2,744)
Changes in prepaid expenses and other current and long-term assets
179
1,413
(1,897)
847
Other
9
9
(65)
26
EBITDA (1)
$
2,922
$
2,567
$
8,002
$
3,779
1.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. EBITDA is defined as net income before (a) interest income and interest expense, (b) provision for (or benefit from) income taxes and (c) depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA excludes non-cash foreign exchange gains and losses, stock-based compensation, impairment of intangible assets, other non-cash tax related items and non-cash costs of lease pool equipment sales. We consider EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to be important indicators for the performance of our business, but not measures of performance or liquidity calculated in accordance with GAAP. We have included these non-GAAP financial measures because management utilizes this information for assessing our performance and liquidity, and as indicators of our ability to make capital expenditures, service debt and finance working capital requirements and we believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are measurements that are commonly used by analysts and some investors in evaluating the performance and liquidity of companies such as us. In particular, we believe that it is useful to our analysts and investors to understand this relationship because it excludes transactions not related to our core cash operating activities. We believe that excluding these transactions allows investors to meaningfully trend and analyze the performance of our core cash operations. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities or net income as indicators of operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. In evaluating our performance as measured by EBITDA, management recognizes and considers the limitations of this measurement. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our obligations for the payment of income taxes, interest expense or other obligations such as capital expenditures. Accordingly, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are only two of the measurements that management utilizes. Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable with similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Contacts:
Rob Capps, President & CEO
MIND Technology, Inc.
281-353-4475
Ken Dennard / Zach Vaughan
Dennard Lascar Investor Relations
713-529-6600
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mind-technology-inc-reports-fiscal-2025-fourth-quarter-and-year-end-results-302434811.html
SOURCE MIND Technology, Inc.
You may like
Technology
U.S. News & World Report Reveals the 2027 Best Places to Retire
Published
23 minutes agoon
October 27, 2026By
Affordability is a top priority for attendees as Midland, Michigan, holds No. 1 spot.
Summary
Midland, Michigan, is the No. 1 Best Place to Retire for the second year in a row.Affordability is the most considered factor when choosing a place to retire in 2027.Florida and Texas dominate the top 250 Best Places to Retire, offering a number of affordable and retiree-tax friendly locations.
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. News & World Report, the global authority in rankings and consumer advice, today revealed the 2027 Best Places to Retire in the United States.
Midland, Michigan, retained the No. 1 rank for the second year in a row. Midland scored high in affordability and retiree taxes, helping it to lock in the top spot.
“Retirees are seeking a place that gives them a sense of security and comfort as they live out their golden years,” said Megan Wood, assistant managing editor, home services and real estate. “Whether that comfort prioritizes scenic nature spots, access to multi-cultural experiences, or everyday affordability, places like Midland, Michigan, offer financial safety while still providing a good quality of life.”
Homosassa Springs, Florida, came in at No. 2 due to strong scores in affordability, 55+ population growth and retiree taxes. High performance for, quality of life, retiree taxes, affordability and quality of life resulted in Weirton, West Virginia, placing No. 3 on the list.
U.S. News adjusted its scoring weights for the 2027 rankings to mirror a growing concern for affordability in America. This resulted in multiple double-digit jumps in the top 25, including Paducah, Kentucky (No. 8), ascending into the top 10 for the first time.
“It’s no secret that affordability is top of mind for Americans this year, which is why U.S. News updated its weighting criteria to better align with what retirees prioritize,” Wood said. “The 2027 rankings reflect key metrics used to highlight the places that best suit retiree needs.”
U.S. News evaluated more than 850 U.S. cities – publishing the top 250 places – based on how well they meet American retirees’ expectations against measures including quality of life, affordability, healthcare, retiree taxes, job market, and population and migration for retirees aged 55 and older.
The six measures factored into this year’s rankings were weighted based on a public survey of individuals across the U.S. who are at or approaching retirement age (45 and older) to find out what matters most to people when they’re considering where to retire. Resources include federal, state and local data provided by Applied Geographic Solutions, which includes data sourced from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis and U.S. News’ Best Hospitals rankings. To learn more about how the rankings are determined, read the Best Places to Retire methodology.
Best Places to Retire is part of U.S. News’ Real Estate section, which provides rankings and tools to help individuals navigate the housing market, including home value estimates to working with an agent.
2027 U.S. News Best Places to Retire – Top 10
*See the full rankings here.
Midland, Michigan Homosassa Springs, Florida Weirton, West VirginiaThe Woodlands, TexasSpring, TexasRancho Rio, New Mexico Altoona, PennsylvaniaPaducah, KentuckyLynchburg, Virginia Palm Coast, Florida
For more information on Best Places to Retire, explore Facebook, LinkedIn, Tik Tok, Instagram and X using #BestPlacesToRetire.
About U.S. News & World Report
U.S. News & World Report is the global leader for journalism that empowers consumers, citizens, business leaders and policy officials to make confident decisions in all aspects of their lives and communities. A multifaceted media company, U.S. News provides unbiased rankings, independent reporting and analysis, and consumer advice to millions of people on USNews.com each month. A pillar in Washington for more than 90 years, U.S. News is the trusted home for in-depth and exclusive insights on education, health, politics, the economy, insurance, personal finance, travel, automobiles, real estate, careers and consumer products and services.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-news–world-report-reveals-the-2027-best-places-to-retire-302920068.html
SOURCE U.S. News & World Report, L.P.
Technology
IBM Introduces Identity and Control for AI Agents, Securing Frontier Intelligence for the Enterprise
Published
23 minutes agoon
October 27, 2026By
Enterprises are deploying agents faster than they can verify them. HashiCorp Vault uses Agent Identity to give each agent a governed identity Verified agents still need limits on access. Vault extends its established secrets management to AI agents, built to enforce least-privilege access and enable real-time revocation when an agent attempts an unauthorized action Enterprises can’t scale agents they can’t see, test or account for. IBM watsonx Orchestrate is designed to unify discovery, containment, and evaluation across Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry and Google Gemini
ATLANTA, Oct. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — At TechXchange 2026, IBM (NYSE: IBM) is announcing new capabilities to help developers, IT and security teams put AI agents to work across business systems with clear authority and accountability. IBM brings together agent discovery, verified identities, access controls and performance evaluation to help organizations understand who owns each agent, control what it can access, and trace its actions across existing applications and infrastructure.
According to Gartner, by 2028 the average Fortune 500 enterprise will use over 150,000 AI agents. But only 13% of organizations believe that they have the right AI agent governance in place [1]. Persistent credentials, unclear ownership and disconnected controls make it harder to govern agents as they interact with other agents, invoke tools and act across teams, platforms and clouds.
“The winners in enterprise AI are changing how their business runs, not simply adding more AI to it,” said Dinesh Nirmal, Senior Vice President, IBM Software. “For agents to take on real work across the systems a company depends on, it requires an AI operating model – one that connects agents to the business’s data, applications and infrastructure and runs them with the same discipline as its most critical systems. Build trust and control into that model, and agents stop being a technology and become a way of doing business.”
Today’s announcements extend IBM’s portfolio to deliver an AI operating model of four essential systems working together: agents, data, automation and hybrid infrastructure. This starts with the trust and control every agent needs – a verified identity, only the access it needs, and one place to discover, secure and evaluate agents regardless of where they were built.
Extending HashiCorp Vault to AI agents
HashiCorp Vault manages the secrets and credentials that applications and services use to access business systems. It provides that control through centrally managed secrets, automated rotation for supported credentials, and dynamically generated credentials that expire or can be revoked. These capabilities help reduce the time exposed credentials remain usable and limit access to the permissions configured for each role.
HashiCorp Vault already secures non-human identities for organizations including ABN AMRO, Adobe, athenahealth, BBVA, BlackRock, Canva, Duke Energy, Expedia, London Stock Exchange, Starbucks, Swiss Federal Railways and Target, across systems that process billions of dollars in transactions [2]. HashiCorp will now extend those capabilities to AI agents, issuing secured, short-lived credentials that limit each agent to what it needs.
Establishing agent identity and accountability
AI agents are a growing class of non-human identity, alongside applications and services. As they begin acting across business systems, enterprises need a clear record of who owns each agent and what authority it has been granted. HashiCorp is combining governed agent identity with credential controls to help organizations delegate work with defined authority and accountability.
When used with HashiCorp Vault, Agent Identity establishes the authoritative record for each agent, such as who owns it, its lifecycle status and the authority it has been granted. Built to extend existing identity and security investments, it shares relevant identity and authorization context with Vault’s credential controls – ultimately enforcing least-privilege access and enabling real-time revocation when an agent attempts an unauthorized action.
Controlling agent credentials and access
Identifying an agent is only the start. Enterprises also need to control the credentials it uses to reach databases, applications and cloud services – and how long those credentials remain valid. As agents invoke tools and act across business systems, their credentials become a critical security boundary. An agent with a long-lived, overprivileged credential can put systems and data at risk if it’s compromised or acts outside its intended task. Enterprises need to establish what each agent’s job is, limit the access it receives and revoke that access when circumstances change.
These controls extend beyond initial authentication. If an agent attempts to retrieve information or perform actions outside its approved permissions, the access can be denied and session revoked in real time to prevent unauthorized activity. Vault’s short-lived credentials and least-privilege controls can further restrict what an agent accesses and the duration of those permissions.
Additional capabilities include:
Vault 2.2 gives agents their own secured accounts, automatically renews their credentials and incorporates post-quantum encryption for quantum-era threats. Secure Hub (public preview) gives companies centralized visibility across their Vault environments to make it easier to understand operational health, usage and security resources.
At TechXchange, client speakers will share how they use Vault to secure enterprise applications, workloads and AI agents
athenahealth: Automating certificate management with Vault’s PKI engine. Albert Einstein College of Medicine: Applying IBM Verify and Vault to AI agent identity, just-in-time access, dynamic secrets and auditability. Optum: Using Vault Radar to detect exposed secrets and Boundary for just-in-time, identity-based access. Seven-Eleven Japan: Centralizing and encrypting secrets with Vault Enterprise and detecting hardcoded secrets with Vault Radar. Yum! Brands: Building an identity security platform with IBM Verify, with a look ahead to machine identities and secrets management.
“AI presents extraordinary opportunities to accelerate biomedical research and discovery, but realizing its potential requires a foundation of security, trust, and responsible governance,” said Shailesh M. Shenoy, Assistant Dean for Information Technology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. “In my experience, technologies such as IBM Verify and HashiCorp Vault can play an important role in helping organizations establish the identity, access, and security controls needed to innovate with confidence.”
Managing agents across platforms
Identity tells organizations what an agent is. But they also need to see every agent they have, wherever it was built. IBM watsonx Orchestrate works across the AI ecosystem, not inside a single vendor’s platform, to give organizations one place to discover, secure and evaluate their agents. Capabilities include:
Discover (tech preview): Organizations can’t govern agents they don’t know exist. Orchestrate connects to platforms such as Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry and Google Gemini to find agents built in third-party environments, so teams can see and manage agents instead of adding them manually. This capability also extends to models and MCP servers. Contain (tech preview): One rogue agent can disrupt others and spread mistakes across the business. Orchestrate now runs agents in isolated sandboxes so a rogue agent can’t interfere with others. Teams also now have access to a kill switch to shut down any agent. Evaluate: Agents that aren’t tested and tracked can quietly drift off course and increase costs. Teams using Orchestrate can now test the quality, accuracy and compliance of agents, models and MCP servers before deployment, then monitor them in production. Built-in cost tracking shows each agent’s model and token use, so teams can spot what’s driving spend and fix it.
Orchestrate also works with Vault’s credential controls and Agent Identity to establish what each agent’s job is, govern its authority and enforce least-privilege credential access. Together, these controls help organizations authorize and audit agent actions and rapidly revoke trust and credentials when risk changes.
Connecting agents to the business
Once agents are authorized to use a company’s APIs and tools, they need to know what already exists, how systems connect, what can be reused safely and what their actions could affect. IBM Integration Intelligence Hub is built to provide that knowledge through its Unified Context Engine, so agents can fix problems like stuck messages or deploy an API using what’s already in place. Skills, approval policies and audit controls keep those actions in check. Instead of rebuilding for AI, organizations can put agents to work on the systems they already depend on.
Scaling agents with NVIDIA
Agent Identity and HashiCorp Vault integrate with NVIDIA OpenShell secure runtime software, the foundation of the NVIDIA OpenShell Architecture. Together, they pair a protected environment for agents to run in with a verified identity and short-lived credentials for every agent, so each action can be traced, limited and reviewed.
“Businesses need enforceable control over how agents operate and what they can access,” said John Fanelli, vice president, enterprise software, NVIDIA. “Our work with IBM combines NVIDIA OpenShell’s policy-governed runtime with Agent Identity and HashiCorp Vault to help enterprises scale AI agents with secure execution, verified identities and tightly scoped access to business systems.”
Responding to Emerging Security Threats
When new vulnerabilities are discovered, enterprises must quickly identify affected systems, determine required changes and deploy fixes without disrupting critical operations. In complex environments, this process often involves multiple teams, tools and processes.
IBM Concert integrates observability, optimization, incident management and security across applications, infrastructure and networks. With AI-powered insights and proof of exploitability, Concert helps teams to identify high-risk vulnerabilities, assess operational impact, and coordinate responses. These capabilities also help organizations address performance, manage costs and maintain resilience in hybrid environments.
HashiCorp Terraform provides an infrastructure context and governed workflows for change implementation. New features now generally available and in public preview, including Terraform policy, Terraform Developer Portal and Terraform remote MCP server, enable developers and AI agents to access approved configurations and implement infrastructure changes through established controls. Terraform powered by Infragraph also helps teams understand infrastructure relationships and dependencies for more informed decisions.
Together, these capabilities enable organizations to progress from identifying vulnerabilities to implementing and verifying remediation, while optimizing the visibility and governance essential for enterprise operations.
A comprehensive system intelligence and change orchestration layer for IBM Z
IBM Z Atlas maps a client’s entire z/OS stack across infrastructure, middleware, and applications, and then uses that intelligence to address the manual effort of tasks like patch management, regulatory response, and sharing system knowledge across teams, from systems programmers to application developers. Atlas addresses the leading cause of unplanned z/OS outages – changes that aren’t proven to be safe – by mapping how a change impacts the z/OS stack and testing and validating it. This design (in tech preview) accelerates clients’ modernization efforts by keeping experts in control and giving practitioners, in operations or development, the same shared Z system visibility to reduce risk.
Availability
HashiCorp Vault 2.2, Agent Identity, watsonx Orchestrate evaluate capabilities, IBM Concert, and HashiCorp Terraform policy are generally available. Secure Hub, Terraform Developer Portal, Terraform remote MCP server, and IBM Z Atlas are in public preview. IBM Integration Intelligence Hub and watsonx Orchestrate discover and contain capabilities are in tech preview.
Statements regarding IBM’s future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice and represent goals and objectives only.
Learn more
IBM TechXchange is IBM’s annual conference for developers and technology practitioners and brings together nearly 6,500 attendees from 85 countries. This year, the event incorporates HashiConf to bring together the HashiCorp community with practitioners from across IBM, Red Hat and Confluent. Attendees can choose from more than 1,000 sessions and experiences, including 180 hands-on labs, 260 client-led sessions and more than 50 certification exams. Speakers include American Airlines, Bradesco, Citi, CVS Health, Deutsche Bank, DoorDash, Hertz, and US Bancorp who will share how they are making AI enterprise ready.
Session livestream and replays will be available here: ibm.biz/txc26-livestream.
Supporting Materials
Strengthen security for agentic AI with new Vault, Verify, Boundary, and Secure Hub capabilities IBM Agent Identity now generally available: Building Trust for the Agentic Era Vault Enterprise 2.2 advances identity security, PKI, and cryptoagility Announcing the public preview of Secure Hub: govern Vault at scale IBM watsonx Orchestrate advances AI agent management with new capabilities IBM Integration Intelligence Hub gives AI the context to act, not just access IBM Concert platform advances the path to cross-domain agentic IT operations Terraform advances infrastructure lifecycle management for the agentic era Introducing IBM Z Atlas: Change Intelligence for IBM Z
[1]: Gartner Identifies Six Steps to Manage AI Agent Sprawl
[2]: HashiCorp Vault client stories
About IBM
IBM is a leading provider of global hybrid cloud and AI, and consulting expertise. We help clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Thousands of governments and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM’s hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently and securely. IBM’s breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and consulting deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM’s long-standing commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity and service. Visit www.ibm.com for more information.
Media contacts:
Sarah Benchaita
IBM
sarah.benchaita@ibm.com
Kate Lehman
IBM
Kate.Lehman@ibm.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/ibm-introduces-identity-and-control-for-ai-agents-securing-frontier-intelligence-for-the-enterprise-302920162.html
Technology
Three Blind Spots Leave Industrial Companies Exposed to Critical Mineral Shortages
Published
23 minutes agoon
October 27, 2026By
Boston Consulting Group Finds Industrial Companies Underestimate Their Critical Mineral Exposure, Which Also Limits Their Access to Public CapitalDemand for Key Minerals Is Projected at 120% to 250% of Forecast Supply Through 2040An Estimated $3.5 Trillion of Products Depend on Gallium, a “Mosquito Mineral” Traded in a Market Under $350 Million a YearSome Governments Have Deployed Less Than 10% of Their Critical Minerals Funds
BOSTON, Oct. 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Industrial companies are underestimating their exposure to critical mineral shortages and missing a strategic opportunity as a result, according to new analysis from Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Three blind spots in the metrics that companies rely on hide where the risk sits, including what BCG calls “mosquito minerals,” so small by traded value that they never reach a risk register.
These are among the findings of Why Critical Mineral Shortages Are a CEO Issue, a BCG report released today. BCG’s proprietary model projects demand for key inputs, including rare earths, graphite, copper and lithium, at roughly 120% to 250% of forecast supply through 2040.
“Most industrials track exposure through spend and direct supplier data, and the minerals that can stop a production line are often the ones they spend almost nothing on,” said Tycho Möncks, a BCG managing director and partner and a coauthor of the report. “The question for CEOs and boards is not whether their company is exposed. It is. The question is whether they intend to live with that exposure or turn it into an advantage.”
Small Markets Can Stall Large Industries
Companies often start their risk assessment with the bill of materials, which points them toward high-volume metals such as copper and lithium. Mosquito minerals fall outside that view. Their traded value is tiny, but the value chains that depend on them are not.
Rare earths. The rare earths used in a fighter jet are worth less than the paint that coats the plane.Gallium. The global market is worth under $350 million a year, with production of only about 900 tons, yet BCG estimates about $3.5 trillion of final products depend on it.Arsenic. The upstream market is about $50 million worldwide, yet a single producer supplies roughly 60% of the ultra-high-purity grade used in 5G and 6G infrastructure, data center optics, radar systems, and defense electronics.Byproduct supply. Gallium, germanium and arsenic are recovered as byproducts of other mining and industrial processes, so the host metal’s market sets their supply. Even a sharp price spike may not bring new production.
Exposure Hides Below Tier One Suppliers
A company that buys almost no critical minerals directly can still be acutely exposed because minerals arrive embedded in motors, magnets, power modules, lasers and sensors. They also sit in the tools and processes used to make those components, from crucibles and catalysts to dies and the capital equipment itself.
Turbine blades, engine blocks and structural aerospace components, for example, are machined with cutting tools made of tungsten carbide bonded with cobalt. A manufacturer that has never bought either metal directly can still see production stop if those tools run short, a dependency that appears on no bill of materials.
Companies also tend to map where critical minerals are mined, but for some minerals the bottleneck is processing, not production. A map of where assets sit and a map of who owns them can look very different, so a change of supplier that looks like diversification may leave a company’s exposure unchanged.
Public Capital Is Committed but Largely Unspent
The three blind spots also lead to a strategic miss. The International Energy Agency reports that public finance commitments to critical minerals in advanced economies reached around $65 billion in 2025, more than four times the 2023 level. BCG’s review of government-backed vehicles found the flagship instruments barely deployed, with some countries having spent less than 10% of their allocated capital and others nothing.
These vehicles are designed to draw in private capital, and offtake requirements are typically the main eligibility gate. BCG argues that companies without a clear view of their own exposure cannot make a credible commitment, and so cannot qualify. The funds are not free money: they carry conditions such as reporting obligations and localization requirements, and they represent only about one tenth of the capital needed through 2040. But for industrial companies, BCG says, they are a way to build a competitive advantage.
Several of the companies that have reframed their approach and tapped public capital are industrial companies and trading firms, not miners, and BCG found that in each case the CEO and executive team led the process of identifying and correcting their blind spots.
“These blind spots have a cost beyond risk. The money is there, but it comes with offtake requirements, and a company cannot make a credible commitment without knowing its own exposure,” said Karthik Valluru, a BCG managing director and senior partner who coauthored the report. “Mapping that exposure properly is where the opportunity starts.”
Download the publication here:
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2026/critical-minerals-risk-blind-spots
Media Contact:
Bruce Wraight
wraight.bruce@bcg.com
About Boston Consulting Group
Boston Consulting Group bridges the gap between ambition and outcomes for the world’s leading companies and organizations. We are built for this era of unprecedented change — bringing strategic clarity rooted in over 60 years of deep domain knowledge, combined with applied AI shaped by our practitioners. BCG works shoulder-to-shoulder with CEOs across industries and geographies to deliver transformative impact at scale: stronger returns, transferred capabilities, and change that sticks. For more information, visit bcg.com.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/three-blind-spots-leave-industrial-companies-exposed-to-critical-mineral-shortages-302920029.html
SOURCE Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
U.S. News & World Report Reveals the 2027 Best Places to Retire
IBM Introduces Identity and Control for AI Agents, Securing Frontier Intelligence for the Enterprise
Three Blind Spots Leave Industrial Companies Exposed to Critical Mineral Shortages
Send Rakhi to UK swiftly with UK Gifts Portal
Whiteboard Series with NEAR | Ep: 45 Joel Thorstensson from ceramic.network
Nullmax and Renesas Forge Strategic Partnership to Deliver Competitive ADAS Solutions for the Global Market
Why You Should Build on #NEAR – Co-founder Illia Polosukhin at CV Labs
Whiteboard Series with NEAR | Ep: 45 Joel Thorstensson from ceramic.network
NEAR End of Year Town Hall 2021: The Open Web World, MetaBUILD 2 Hackathon and 2021 recap
Trending
-
Technology4 days agoMiami Startup BOB Raises $5.5M To Build An AI-Powered Banking Platform
-
Technology5 days agoPRC-Saltillo Acquires Ner Chat, Bringing Minspeak® Symbols to Glint Visual Support Platform
-
Coin Market5 days agoBitcoin ETFs bag another $528M, taking 3-day haul past $1B
-
Coin Market4 days agoBitcoin ETFs bleed $635M as October slides back into the red
-
Coin Market4 days agoCysic dangles a 10% bounty, hacker pours loot into Tornado Cash
-
Technology5 days agoSnapmaker Introduces New Filament Bundle, Expanding Its Full Spectrum Printing Ecosystem
-
Coin Market4 days agoEthereum delays Glamsterdam Hoodi testnet launch over security risks
-
Coin Market4 days agoMalaysia, Thailand join Singapore’s cross-border stablecoin push
